put into the table different assemblies

[Luca862]

Good morning.

I have the need to put on the same table two distinct assemblies, however, to coincide a certain point of the same.
In practice, at the table, I should overlap the two axioms by making a certain point coincide.

Unfortunately when I put the two distinct assemblies on the table, I can align them horizontally or vertically, but they are not exactly how to overlap them

Does anyone have any ideas? Thank you.

 

[Catafratto]

I don't really have the direct solution to your problem; I would put everything in a "comfortable" set by placing the two assemblies as desired and possibly using visual representations to view them as preferred. . .

 

[reb_bl]

in addition to the most sensible catafract solution, if you do not have to quote them but only see them together you could make 2 different views and use this ilogic rule to align the views.
https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/aligning-views-to-a-line/m-p/7310434#m655842

 

[Luca862]

I don't really have the direct solution to your problem; I would put everything in a "comfortable" set by placing the two assemblies as desired and possibly using visual representations to view them as preferred. . .

I currently do as indicated by you. then I take the table in autocad and I manually overlap the views of the two assemblies

in addition to the most sensible catafract solution, if you do not have to quote them but only see them together you could make 2 different views and use this ilogic rule to align the views.
https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/aligning-views-to-a-line/m-p/7310434#m655842

thanks for the answer but ilogic rules are too complicated for me to use.
with the new year I will study them and maybe I will be able to use them for my subsequent assemblies

 

[reb_bl]

I currently do as indicated by you. then I take the table in autocad and I manually overlap the views of the two assemblies




thanks for the answer but ilogic rules are too complicated for me to use.
with the new year I will study them and maybe I will be able to use them for my subsequent assemblies

as already said is a piece is solution, but do not be afraid to use ilogic rules, especially if you already find them on the net. this works nicely, already used personally.

 

[Catafratto]

I currently do as indicated by you. then I take the table in autocad and I manually overlap the views of the two assemblies

No, you don't do like me: I don't drive. I place the two assemblies to and b in a set c (which maybe I use only to make the table, but I don't care), they place them mounted/allined as I want and _poi_ I make the table c; in this way I am sure that all the tables are associative that for me distracted as they are, it is vital

 

[stefanobruno]

the day that you can align as required by the luca, I will make mortal jumps.
it seems that certain requirements the autodesk progs do not even know them, the nice is that they send the mails to make us share of what they are implementing, ask for opinions and advice and then do things that do not improve the workflow (when they do not worsen it, like this kale alignment pallini from 2016 onwards)

 

[exxon]

I tell you. Oh, how do I tell you...

 

[Luca862]

No, you don't do like me: I don't drive. I place the two assemblies to and b in a set c (which maybe I use only to make the table, but I don't care), they place them mounted/allined as I want and _poi_ I make the table c; in this way I am sure that all the tables are associative that for me distracted as they are, it is vital

Okay now I get it. this can also be a valid solution

as already said is a piece is solution, but do not be afraid to use ilogic rules, especially if you already find them on the net. this works nicely, already used personally.

I'm going to study a little more, and then I'm going to apply them.

thank you all for the advice!!