MARCOC
Guest
hi...and could change or style of quota in the threads of parts (ipt) ion sketch quotas. . .
I would like to get the result of the image
I would like to get the result of the image
c3kkos
Guest
I recommend you or write more calmly or change your keyboard. . .
You must interpret what you write!
You must interpret what you write!
Tarkus
Guest
once translated:
Yes and no,
you have to quote from extreme to extreme of the circle (quad in autocaddese) and add by hand the symbol of diameter editing the text;as you have to do with autocad... .
Yes and no,
you have to quote from extreme to extreme of the circle (quad in autocaddese) and add by hand the symbol of diameter editing the text;as you have to do with autocad... .
Peppe
Guest
once you create the classic quota you drag the central point of the quota outside of the view such quota moves and becomes like the one you wanted.... if you can't try to erase the axes of work so as not to accidentally select them
MauroM
Guest
grandissimo !!:finger::finger:
Tarkus
Guest
I didn't know that. .
MARCOC
Guest
but I do not speak of quotas in the table but of the quotas that are placed in the sketch in the file of parts (ipt model)
stefanobruno
Guest
MARCOC
Guest
good stefanobruno exactly. . . Otherwise, every time I devote my share and bring it back to the position I need... .
stefanobruno
Guest
I think you're missing your head, how much practice do you have of inventor?
I see you have indicated that you use autocad, forget that world!
Bye.
MARCOC
Guest
Actually little because I'm a think design and gbg user really... but I often use autocad and inventor
stefanobruno
Guest
Then listen to me, let me lose the recovery of quotas from the model.
for your consolation, even when I had the first demo copy of inventor for my hands reasoned so, then I spoke with the dealer, made two half days of course and I realized that it was not what.
other things are important.
Hi.
didinero
Guest
I also agree that it is not what, inventor fails to recover the odds from the model well. for me though it is a very serious sin; the times of the masses in the table stretch and then you have to "rethink" to what quotas you wanted in tolerance and what tolerance to put (e.g.: h7 or +0.1/0 ?) while when you design ideas you have clear.
stefanobruno
Guest
It's enough that when you plan, the shares in the sketch put them with tolerance.
then, when you go to the table, quoti popping up the use of tolerance.
so it also avoids that mistakes arise, if the puts on the table makes her a person who did not follow the project.
Bye.
Tarkus
Guest
That's right. l'unico motif to put tolerances in a sketch, otherwise it's like making a house starting from the roof....
Peppe
Guest
If the problem is to have to recover quotas it seems to me that inventor goes quite well, if instead you want to recover quotas and hope that they are placed at your liking.... it seems a bit exaggerated.
the convenience of the quota recovery is just to have a correspondence with the value given during the design, then the designer puts it as and where it wants. . .
I also think that with inventor the time "lost" for putting in tables/quotatura is irrisorio than for example autocad.... so I absolutely do not see a time gain in recovering all the shares from sketch.
It's my modest opinion:
stefanobruno
Guest
My details always arise without tolerances.That's right. l'unico motif to put tolerances in a sketch, otherwise it's like making a house starting from the roof....
when the project takes a more consistent form and the details are consolidated, even partially, All the couplings and I give them, All, of tolerances in sketch quotations, even if I already know that I will develop the harvests (then if I find someone who helps me, the better)
beyond all, since inventor (and all other cad3d ) allows to document in the model the tolerances, I do not see why not do it, if it becomes system does not make you waste time, indeed.
Bye.
Tarkus
Guest
All the measures are like "nominal" i.e. without tolerances, so already okay by itself.
I prefer to requote everything on the table, because recovering the odds doesn't seem like a lot of time, and then because in the sketch it can make me comfortable to share in a certain way or with a certain method, and in the table another.
Then it's at the table that I "take" to use a term of yours, quotas and I'll apply the tolerances.
Anyway, that's just the system I use;maybe it's not the best, but I feel good... .
didinero
Guest
is exactly what I do; the problem is that with inventor I can not recover all quotas (at least not in the views where I want to put them); so about 1/3 of the quotas (I think, at least on average, but depends on the complexity of the table) I have to put them back by hand .... and I only see this as a waste of time. It's true that since version 9 (the first I used) things have improved... hopefully.
Hi.