rametric analysis

[maxopus]

Carol Maxopus can motivate me this nice answer.. .

model for several years in the automotive sector and I never thought of carrying out such control.
I repeat that with curvature analysis or other analysis (not with zebra analysis) I can see well what is not going on in a model.

I honestly believe that as a moderator you could have saved her. :redface:

free to believe what you want.

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

model for several years in the automotive sector and I never thought of carrying out such control.
I repeat that with curvature analysis or other analysis (not with zebra analysis) I can see well what is not going on in a model.

Forgive me max, but here you're begging for presumption.

the fact that you have been working for several years in the automotive sector has nothing to do with molding, die casting or injection.

In the printed pieces, especially the complex ones it is of fundamental importance to have control of this type because then when you go to generate matrices and puppets if you forget some ray of edge are birds for diabetics, I don't know if you realize what it means to build a model of 2000 feature, maybe not.. I have an idea because I have worked on it for a long time and I guarantee that it is absolutely not easy to find these areas, I have become "bravine" thanks to this sector.
Among other things this was the simplest part of the work.. without counting mould separations from fear and deforms of all kinds on all walls not to go under the picture.
Unfortunately I had to look for them "at sight" because in the release 17-18-19-2000i2 and 2001 the tool searched did not exist yet, this is already a help not little but limited.

ps: automotive is not always synonymous with maximum excellence in modeling

ps2: sometimes you have to be a little more humble and respect the work that others do.

greetings
♪

 

[maxopus]

Forgive me max, but here you're begging for presumption.

the fact that you have been working for several years in the automotive sector has nothing to do with molding, die casting or injection.

In the printed pieces, especially the complex ones it is of fundamental importance to have control of this type because then when you go to generate matrices and puppets if you forget some ray of edge are birds for diabetics, I don't know if you realize what it means to build a model of 2000 feature, maybe not.. I have an idea because I have worked on it for a long time and I guarantee that it is absolutely not easy to find these areas, I have become "bravine" thanks to this sector.
Among other things this was the simplest part of the work.. without counting mould separations from fear and deforms of all kinds on all walls not to go under the picture.
Unfortunately I had to look for them "at sight" because in the release 17-18-19-2000i2 and 2001 the tool searched did not exist yet, this is already a help not little but limited.

ps: automotive is not always synonymous with maximum excellence in modeling

ps2: sometimes you have to be a little more humble and respect the work that others do.

greetings
♪

It can be that I'm a suspect.
in the automotive sector there are not only the surfaces of the body shop.
Maybe I understand little and I probably didn't come to 2000 features but I exceeded 1000 and I guarantee that making certain supports for fans (injecting abs loaded glass) is not exactly a 5-minute thing.
I've done about ten this year, and I hope I can see other kinds of work, because these are a monstrous pallority.
This is injection pieces for which the mold closure is not exactly a plan and I never wrong a shot (otherwise the moldist would come home to present me the account).
I control it by following very carefully and gradually what I do and it does not seem to me to proceed slowly or making madornal errors.
I apologize if someone felt "touched" by my considerations, it was not my intention.

 

[flaviobrio88]

Bye to all,
It often happens that at the end of modeling, in my case it is of particular automotive, some small radius on surfaces is forgotten. exist secrete you some system type rametric analysis that besides highlighting/coloring the rays according to their size highlighting or also indicate the live edges in the model?
may seem trivial, but with models that have about 2000 features becomes important :biggrin:

Thank you

Sorry wrong

 

[loviseh]

Hi.
I don't know if it can be useful but in powermill there is a command that makes you "raggiometric" analysis to see if they exist on the model of the zones not accessible by a mill with a certain radius and therefore need to be worked with a smaller mill.

 

[Mauri:66]

It can be that I'm a suspect.
in the automotive sector there are not only the surfaces of the body shop.
Maybe I understand little and I probably didn't come to 2000 features but I exceeded 1000 and I guarantee that making certain supports for fans (injecting abs loaded glass) is not exactly a 5-minute thing.
I've done about ten this year, and I hope I can see other kinds of work, because these are a monstrous pallority.
This is injection pieces for which the mold closure is not exactly a plan and I never wrong a shot (otherwise the moldist would come home to present me the account).
I control it by following very carefully and gradually what I do and it does not seem to me to proceed slowly or making madornal errors.
I apologize if someone felt "touched" by my considerations, it was not my intention.

carro maxopus,
the first time you will figure out to model keys in hand a steering box with 8-car mold and two or more squeezes, i.e. automotive safety details for merkel, percui if wrong are spreads for everyone, you will see that before making similar statements you think twice because in this case the "pieces" have to go out. :biggrin:
However apart from this exchange of views that always leads to something, thanks to all.:finger:

maurials

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

It can be that I'm a suspect.
in the automotive sector there are not only the surfaces of the body shop.
Maybe I understand little and I probably didn't come to 2000 features but I exceeded 1000 and I guarantee that making certain supports for fans (injecting abs loaded glass) is not exactly a 5-minute thing.
I've done about ten this year, and I hope I can see other kinds of work, because these are a monstrous pallority.
This is injection pieces for which the mold closure is not exactly a plan and I never wrong a shot (otherwise the moldist would come home to present me the account).
I control it by following very carefully and gradually what I do and it does not seem to me to proceed slowly or making madornal errors.
I apologize if someone felt "touched" by my considerations, it was not my intention.

I do not doubt the error factor, if that's why I didn't miss them, but that doesn't mean that such a research tool reduces the risk of error.
then it is obvious that everything is useful and nothing is indispensable. . .

 

[RS4]

mauri

have you managed to save the custom question in pro\e?? How did I tell you? ?

 

[Mauri:66]

have you managed to save the custom question in pro\e?? How did I tell you? ?

Hello rs4,
I managed but I was interested in research Clean that only highlighted the edges belonging to two surfaces with angles greater than x°, otherwise it also selects the tangent ones to the wireframe style roundings.

 

[flaviobrio88]

here's what it takes to mauri:66
blue edges report distancing

 

[Mauri:66]

here's what it takes to mauri:66
blue edges report distancing

Hello flaviobrio88,
in this case it is evidenced the distancing lack of curves g1 and g2, which do not necessarily serve in my specific modeling, but surely are necessary for the plated surfaces of a car. However you are right the application is the right one :smile: