realize a .txt file that contains all the global variables of the parts of a set

[Andrea_lp]

Hello everyone,
I must realize, in solidworks, a very basic vehicle scheme, equipped with suspension and steering system. I am trying to use global variables for each part, connecting them to external text files in order to make any changes in more immediate ways. for now I have managed only to reason on the individual parts obtaining for each of them an independent text file. the next step to which I aim is to obtain, downstream of the realization of the axieme, an overall list containing all the variables of the parts of the axieme. Can someone tell me if it's possible and possibly give me some inspiration to understand how to do it?
Thank you.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

the next step to which I aim is to obtain, downstream of the realization of the axieme, an overall list containing all the variables of the parts of the axieme

your purpose is to change all variables from one file directly from the axieme or do you only need it as a list?
first case you can't do it because you should have the variables run at the level of together and not part

 

[Andrea_lp]

your purpose is to change all variables from one file directly from the axieme or do you only need it as a list?
first case you can't do it because you should have the variables run at the level of together and not part

hello, thanks for the answer, what I would like to do is to modify all the variables from a single file, is this not feasible in any case or defining variables at the level of the axieme is possible? I tried to achieve a rough-rolled test axieme by defining the variables within the axieme and not at the level of the parts and seems to work, is it wrong to proceed in this way?
Thank you.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

or defining variables at the axieme level is it possible? I tried to achieve a rough-rolled test axieme by defining the variables within the axieme and not at the level of the parts and seems to work, is it wrong to proceed in this way?

you have already answered yourself.
for the purpose that you prefix this is the correct method.

 

[Andrea_lp]

you have already answered yourself.
for the purpose that you prefix this is the correct method.

thanks for availability