Lawrence
Guest
Good morning, everyone.
I'm not a crack expert. In fact, for more than 10 years I used only inventor.
Now, because of a decline in work in my office, I was temporary moved by my colleagues in the nearby office who use ptc software.
I say that I have my problem.
I have a subassieme y, inside which I have to mount a series of tubes on a reference structure.
in my subassieme y, therefore, I do not want the structure to appear, but only the part related to pipes, fittings and various distributors.
in the table, however, I need to see the structure, so that in the department they can easily understand where all the elements of the piping should be mounted.
I thought of using the copy geometry of the structure, starting from the evelope of the same.
doing so does not calculate the weight of the frame and does not appear to me the component in separate. Moreover, at the table it is immediately recognized as an element not fundamental and placed on other layers.
on the other hand, however, the subassieme y will have to be subsequently mounted inside the assieme father x.
in this, the structure that I first put as "reference" is already present, and will be that "official".
I would therefore like to create a visual representation in the subassieme y where the copy geometry of the structure is hidden, and use the same representation in the x axieme, so as not to see 2 overlapping frames.
Can you help me?
thanks in advance, even for having spent time reading my problem.
I'm not a crack expert. In fact, for more than 10 years I used only inventor.
Now, because of a decline in work in my office, I was temporary moved by my colleagues in the nearby office who use ptc software.
I say that I have my problem.
I have a subassieme y, inside which I have to mount a series of tubes on a reference structure.
in my subassieme y, therefore, I do not want the structure to appear, but only the part related to pipes, fittings and various distributors.
in the table, however, I need to see the structure, so that in the department they can easily understand where all the elements of the piping should be mounted.
I thought of using the copy geometry of the structure, starting from the evelope of the same.
doing so does not calculate the weight of the frame and does not appear to me the component in separate. Moreover, at the table it is immediately recognized as an element not fundamental and placed on other layers.
on the other hand, however, the subassieme y will have to be subsequently mounted inside the assieme father x.
in this, the structure that I first put as "reference" is already present, and will be that "official".
I would therefore like to create a visual representation in the subassieme y where the copy geometry of the structure is hidden, and use the same representation in the x axieme, so as not to see 2 overlapping frames.
Can you help me?
thanks in advance, even for having spent time reading my problem.