• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

reference for geometric tolerances

  • Thread starter Thread starter DANI-3D
  • Start date Start date

DANI-3D

Guest
hello, everyone.
i have a memory void, age advances, i don't remember how to insert a reference in the drv to be recalled in geometric tolerances.
i have to add b and c refs, see image and i can't find the command.
have mercy on me.
thank you.
 

Attachments

  • Immagine.webp
    Immagine.webp
    72.4 KB · Views: 31
hi, dani!

maybe you're referring to the command i highlighted in the red riquard?



i see that it is not in your bar, on the tab "annota"....maybe try to look for it on the commands!
 

Attachments

  • rif.webp
    rif.webp
    39 KB · Views: 36
I don't know wf5 unfortunately.
if I don't remember badly on wf3 was under the menu "insert -> model reference".

test on the drop-down menu of the "insert" group. .

Does the online guide not help you?
 
Finally!
reference axis 2d.

Unfortunately the online guide extensively explains how to insert references and geometric tolerances directly into the model and then recall them in the drw, but, perhaps mistaken, is a method that I do not use.
 
I, since I use ptc products, I am translating as much information as possible on 3d: it seems more challenging, but at the end of the games is a guarantee. I then use the family table enough, and I think the advantages multiply.

Anyway, just find the right path! good or bad, you can do almost everything! ! !

ps: in any case, if you use "model reference" in the drw, the plan, or axis, creates it in the 3d, and what you see is nothing but a call, as you said!!

:finger:
 
i... ps: in any case, if you use "model reference" in the drw, the plan, or the axis, creates it in the 3d, and what you see is nothing but a call, as you said!!
It is true, the only advantage is that references, and tolerances created in the drw do not see them in the modeling phase, and in some cases can disturb not little.
if they are inserted in the prt the best system to view them or not is to work with layers?
 
Well, for my way of working, yes. then maybe it is subjective and it is not excluded that there are other ways, more effective.
Usually in my models I leave everything in sight, except in commercial components.
also because, when they are together and the plans become many, I use the "binocular" to look for what I need.

cmq I think the layers are very good, especially because you can create them with rules, and the "game" becomes very powerful....:wink:
 
we say yes, but it's all native!! !

ps: Remember you select "associative" in your options! :finger:
 

Attachments

  • LAYER.webp
    LAYER.webp
    48.7 KB · Views: 21

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top