trieste290
Guest
Hi.
test with the "face case" command by selecting the "cancella and patch" option.
test with the "face case" command by selecting the "cancella and patch" option.
nicocz
Guest
I had already tried, but it only does it for the straight part of the connection. the curved connection does not do it, also because the semigomite is not regular: starts from a radius and ends with another radius.. .
with toptron there is the command "remove and extend". Is there anything similar in solidworks?
with toptron there is the command "remove and extend". Is there anything similar in solidworks?
eboss
Guest
Could you try posting the file?
tried to cut the pattern under the fitting, create a surface and make face replacement?
tried to cut the pattern under the fitting, create a surface and make face replacement?
nicocz
Guest
I couldn't recreate the final part of the curve... Consider that it is a perfect semicircumference with aletta. therefore the connection also takes the final part of the semicircumference. . .
marcof
Guest
I think the hippo is given by geometry in the transition between the straight and semicircumference in the foreground. from the image I cannot understand the exact shape of the upper flat face and to what correspond those three lines that determine then the three small fittings. you tried to erase faces and
in a similar part but without that geometry, with the two semicirculations of different diameter, the command deletes face with the option "cancella and patch" works and recreates the live edge.
if you place the file is better.. .
nicocz
Guest
to all of you!
I attach the file in question. This is a skyscraper that I have solved for now with toptron... I would like to find a solution with solidworks to avoid the usual import/export, etc., losing (or not being able to manage later) the subsequent processing. . .
thanks to all of you...
I attach the file in question. This is a skyscraper that I have solved for now with toptron... I would like to find a solution with solidworks to avoid the usual import/export, etc., losing (or not being able to manage later) the subsequent processing. . .
thanks to all of you...
eboss
Guest
so in speed I get this idea, could a solution like that solve your problem?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sp8o2ecizyu&feature=youtu.be
nicocz
Guest
so it would be okay if the flat part is on the same level... the widest part has a tiered elevation difference. . .
eboss
Guest
eboss
Guest
Mike1967
Guest
Supposing that your part as I drew it (which wonderful day will be... when accurate information about the requests for help will be published...), it works.
I used the patch twice because doing it all at once made a mistake.
Attachments
nicocz
Guest
Sorry, mike. First of all, thanks to attention and help, but I didn't understand much... Why did you make such a big difference? the difference in altitude must be 3 tenths! then the elbow must have a diameter of input and a diameter of output different from each other! and what do you mean when you write "when precise data will be published on the requests for help"?
marcof
Guest
I looked at the file quickly and I think it's just that transition with small fittings that complicates things. If I have time tonight I relax and watch.. .
nicocz
Guest
No solution?