rename the pro/e forum section

[maxopus]

I would like your opinion.
Since the product is now called creo parametric, what do you say if we look at the relevant section of the forum ? (maybe leaving some references for the old versions)

I would say that the same thing should be done for Osd who has become a direct creo (which says er President :biggrin

 

[MBT]

and maybe join the two sections in one... .
creo (which in Friuli means also acerbo, not mature.. . )
then divide into creo parametric and creo direct

 

[Trotto@81]

I think it should be added as suffix for a period and only after totally renamed, because many people do not know about this change or simply because they use a previous version and could have problems with the searches in the various engines.

 

[Er Presidente]

I would like your opinion.
Since the product is now called creo parametric, what do you say if we look at the relevant section of the forum ? (maybe leaving some references for the old versions)

I would say that the same thing should be done for Osd who has become a direct creo (which says er President :biggrin

Satanist!


I love you!!! !

 

[Er Presidente]

I think it should be added as suffix for a period and only after totally renamed, because many people do not know about this change or simply because they use a previous version and could have problems with the searches in the various engines.

That's good! !
see how max is done?

add, small little at the bottom "powered by creo" and stop!

p.s.: and I recommend you don't want to put on the ptc logo that I leave immediately!
:biggrin:

 

[cacciatorino]

I think it should be added as suffix for a period and only after totally renamed, because many people do not know about this change or simply because they use a previous version and could have problems with the searches in the various engines.

It seems like a shared idea.

 

[maxopus]

That's good! !
see how max is done?

add, small little at the bottom "powered by creo" and stop!

p.s.: and I recommend you don't want to put on the ptc logo that I leave immediately!
:biggrin:

I'll stick it all over... until nausea

 

[MBT]

I'll stick it all over... until nausea

even in the logo can't make black edges, he... :redface:

:biggrin::biggrin:

 

[maxopus]

even in the logo can't make black edges, he... :redface:

:biggrin::biggrin:

on creo they put them... for drug addicts. :biggrin:

 

[MBT]

But...
Have I already said that the ptc logo has a strange resemblance??? ? :confused

 

[maxopus]

But...
Have I already said that the ptc logo has a strange resemblance??? ? :confused

the president had already highlighted it in his time.
that is a stylized "carnissimo" for the other pseudocad constructors.
so much they can do all the goats they want, they will never get there. :biggrin:

 

[arzigogolo]

I would like your opinion.
Since the product is now called creo parametric, what do you say if we look at the relevant section of the forum ? (maybe leaving some references for the old versions)

I would say that the same thing should be done for Osd who has become a direct creo (which says er President :biggrin

ciao max.

per me va benissimo.

ciao. :smile:

 

[Prof.]

I agree, too!

 

[MBT]

the president had already highlighted it in his time.
that is a stylized "carnissimo" for the other pseudocad constructors.
so much they can do all the goats they want, they will never get there. :biggrin:

They don't sound. . .
I refer to the fact that it looks dramatically like this:
: Jigggrin:

 

[maxopus]

They don't sound. . .
I refer to the fact that it looks dramatically like this:
View attachment 23175: Jigggrin:

That's right... that's the one (the very meat), we've understood:

 

[maxopus]

then we look like:
creo parametric design (ex pro/e)

or can suffice:
create parametric (ex pro/e) ?

 

[mamobono]

on the name I do not express myself since I have and I will have wf4 cause intralink 3.4 :frown:

while I suggest adding a sheet section

the messages that treat them are now missing

Think about it.

ps seeing the time indicated on the messages the forum clock is back 2 hours?

Hi.

 

[maxopus]

while I suggest adding a sheet section

the messages that treat them are now missing

Hi.

It is not bad the idea of a section for sheets.
Let's see what others think.
Maybe it might be useful to open a survey, what do you think?

 

[cacciatorino]

It is not bad the idea of a section for sheets.
Let's see what others think.
Maybe it might be useful to open a survey, what do you think?

I am not a pro/e user for which my opinion is marginal, but I wanted to invite you to reflect on an excessive fragmentation of the forums: in my opinion you lose very much in readability.

indeed I was almost going to ask you to think if you shorten the various subforums, before you see this message.

 

[maxopus]

I am not a pro/e user for which my opinion is marginal, but I wanted to invite you to reflect on an excessive fragmentation of the forums: in my opinion you lose very much in readability.

indeed I was almost going to ask you to think if you shorten the various subforums, before you see this message.

You're right, too.
when the forum is divided into sections, consultation is more difficult.
from now on I open a survey to hear the different opinions, we will hear the most experienced users and moderators of the other sections what they think.