• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

request explanations room

  • Thread starter Thread starter valeria_emme
  • Start date Start date
The hole on the base seems to me to be d. 32.
that pins used to fix your roasters the m30? ... eat healthy hippopotamuses. :biggrin::biggrin:
has a 24-shaft... anke to me came to mind something bigger than a chicken:biggrin:
 
difficult (impossible) to say back from where the detail may be extrapolated.
is so common (with various solutions for fixing the base) that can serve everything as nothing.

curious the exercise assigned to the student; seems that puzzle game of the week where from 3 or 4 lines/archi the reader must complete an entire design/vignette.. they come out to hundreds all different and plausible:smile:.

but perhaps the purpose is precisely that, not to guess extensively from where exactly that piece was taken, but rather to assign a place/function within a hypothetical general project. therefore calculating and motivating everything accordingly.
I mean, for the designer candidate, that's just a point.

undoubtedly is a support for tree.. for which valery tree do you.
if the quantities at stake will make you lean for the fusion/printing eye that lacks a whole series of fittings (I would also put a rib, but depends on what you want to do).
and the holes and grooves the machine doers (the ones of the safe tree, that in the car will have to pass us) even without "preforo souls", that the mold is easier.
leaves overmetal at leastunder the face of the base, which will then be paved and used as a reference.

greetings
Mar
 
Yes, all you said is right... The job assigned to me is just that... cmq have you confirmed what I thought, taking away a lot of doubts about possible errors (I can ask why would you put a rib? ? )
p.s. the housing for the bearing is not unified : (I checked the tables skf and does not exist :eek:
 
there is not only the skf and there is not only the desired bearings. . .

but does the 520 faith still exist as a designation?
 
there is not only the skf and there is not only the desired bearings. . .
Yes,
could also consider an application with "bronzine".
then to put a bearing should add a further axle to create the bar for the outer ring.
but does the 520 faith still exist as a designation?
no should not, it is "superied".
but in schools/university still do not know:biggrin:
(but also in production and trade is still used).

greetings
Marco:smile:
 
no should not, it is "superied".
but in schools/university still do not know:biggrin:
(but also in production and trade is still used).
in fact it seemed to me to remember something.. .
It's not true that they don't know, it's the production that doesn't know, and consequently it's behind everything and everyone...
in the workshop we talk only of iron, steel and stainless steel...
 
difficult (impossible) to say back from where the detail may be extrapolated.
is so common (with various solutions for fixing the base) that can serve everything as nothing.
Right. I think it's just a "support" point. How do you say what it's for?
Sure, you can rule out that it's the piece of a wristwatch, but guess what it takes.. .
If you have to do one, you're sold out. If you have to make 1000 maybe you should do it by fusion.
 
the one 3158 which defined steels for castings and forging was a 1977 standard and was replaced in January 2006 by the uni en 10293:2006 - code ics : 77.140.80
Yes... :finger: that's what I found... Don't tell me that's not good.
 
Yes... :finger: that's what I found... Don't tell me that's not good.
on the site uni is indicated as norm in force, so it is okay.
probably the designations remained the same.
The steels of this type seem to have not suffered the "restyling" of hot-rolled steels (e.g. the fe360b has become s235jr).
 
seen the size of the piece
you can also think of a fusion in spheroidal cast iron gs 400 or gs 500/7

for a steel melt, I think that costs are a little out of the market
like lanche equipment
instead for a fusion of other gs to have a fusory cost big way
acceptable training equipment also have radiant costs
it is useless to add that if we know the real use of the fuse
It is necessary to proportion the suit to the efforts

p.s.
Once the engine cam trees were made of steel
for several years they do in spheroidal cast iron
maybe just for some alpha or bmw models still make steel
Thank you very muchhttp://www.fonderiapagliotti.it/it/ghisa/99
 
I would say that the "real" I use knows who invented it.
a support for trees can be made in n+1 ways. support for "menarrosti" I like.
I would say that there are at least one solutions for the object in question.
 
In my opinion it is a support for a tree door cutters in a machine tool! is likely to be mounted vertically to download weight on the support. Hi.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
ciao
Back
Top