responsibility by organigram

[tartufon80]

......if you wake up one morning and say that the responsibilities are mine as I show that the decisions he took?

No... I knew how many things I did in the voice of
This is precisely the part in bold that criticism :mixed: how do you prove it?
Good evenings and good night to all.

Good morning, everyone!

and all I believe converge again in a previous discussion opened by technomodel (qui).

 

[TECNOMODEL]

Yeah, we're always there.

However, speaking with colleagues, it turns out that the problem existed with those who preceded me, indeed it was the reason why he left.

in fact he had put in the quality manual that in the plan project the technical manager of the same was explicit.

So I should have solved at least the problem of having my shoulders covered. in the initial draft minutes and in the plans I will explain that technical responsibility is assumed by the Directorate-General.

I then created a project report in which I address the various decisions taken and those who took them, together with the reports in which I would say that I can be quiet.
At least with regard to the law, then I already know that the octogenary will say that I lied, falsified the documents or misunderstood:

 

[Fulvio Romano]

However, we do not confuse assignments with the delegates.
If I give you an assignment, and you're wrong, I'm mad at you. If I want to report you, I have to prove that I have delegated you, I have the burden of proof.
How do I prove it? simple, I'll let you sign a delegation, and my proof is your signature.
for the important deleghe (ceo, coo, cfo, etc.) you go from the notary, I don't know if I explain.

 

[MBT]

No... I knew how many things I did in the voice of .

Well, come on.
These are not fuffigne!
They don't charge you like that. I would not accept such an assignment as "in voice".

This is precisely the part in bold that criticism :mixed: how do you prove it?
Good evenings and good night to all.

see the other discussion of technomodel.. .

 

[numero1]

Well, come on.
These are not fuffigne!
They don't charge you like that. I would not accept such an assignment as "in voice".

But you see mbt, I sincerely admire you and I am happy for you.....
the main difference between you and techno is that you, obviously, managed to enter a society that has the low spheres.
This has some disadvantages but also advantages... but congratulations to you.
techno, evidently and while being good, instead he found work in a society like we say.... "padronale".
I, I worked in both types of companies, but I found myself dealing much more often with companies of the type indicated by techno.
That's why I understand, I think better than you, what he's going through.
and it is always for this reason that I do not consider so strange certain dynamics that he tells.

see the other discussion of technomodel.. .

I agree...

 

[ceschi1959]

I make an example: the head decides to make a component with a thickness x and subpo it to y bar pressure.
I verify and realize that it is undersized with risk of breaking. mark it, but the answer is "as I say."

we go to the test bench and the component breaks, with loss of oil in pressure and pieces that splash in every place.
My partner working at the counter is hit. who is responsible?

the responsibility is of the test office and the safety officer, as it must prepare all the necessary measures to prevent injury in case of breakage or burst or any other malfunction.
On the other hand the tests serve precisely to this and it is possible, if not highly probable, that a piece breaks. suppose to make a compression test of a piece, breaks and a splinter strikes the attendant: the responsibility is not of the designer of the piece but of those who did not put the protections to the machine.
if the piece breaks into exercise then it is another pair of sleeves because it is the company that once it puts in circulation the product becomes responsible.