luca 11
Guest
hi guys, I need an information, the 2014 version of revit for students has the annoying writing of autodesk in print ? moreover to make it better to use 3ds max or vray ? I thank you infinitely!:biggrin:
lance
Guest
1 - yes
2 - 3ds max is vray software is rendering engine....:biggrin:
2 - 3ds max is vray software is rendering engine....:biggrin:
luca 11
Guest
Thank you, can I implement vray in revit?
lance
Guest
no revit architecture uses mentalray.. .
luca 11
Guest
Forgive me, I don't want to contradict you but a fellow student tells me that by printing as a student version in 2014 no longer appears that written. Have they changed? He also sent me the pdf and there is no writing.
lance
Guest
can be so much better...:finger:
Casy
Guest
I don't understand why there's so much ignorance in the forums, sorry for my criticism, I'm an expert in the industry I'm both a student and a worker.
1) revit architecture uses as a mental ray engine similar to that of 3dsmax but simplified.
2) vray is an external rendering engine or is an additional application so 3ds max is not vray, because in 3ds max I can decide with what engine to make I can make the renders. vray does not exist for revit architecture. exists for cinema 4d schecthup professional and 3dsmax
3) the student version always written in the press also revit architecture 2014
sure if it does not appear is because the program went to look for some ***** 2014 installed in the pc
1) revit architecture uses as a mental ray engine similar to that of 3dsmax but simplified.
2) vray is an external rendering engine or is an additional application so 3ds max is not vray, because in 3ds max I can decide with what engine to make I can make the renders. vray does not exist for revit architecture. exists for cinema 4d schecthup professional and 3dsmax
3) the student version always written in the press also revit architecture 2014
sure if it does not appear is because the program went to look for some ***** 2014 installed in the pc
lance
Guest
@casy.
I've been a lot in doubt if I answer you or not, then since you're in the second post I decided to do it!
I don't question your preparation definitely higher than mine (I never dared to call myself an expert of nothing), much more than the information you provided is absolutely correct, but what did you add to constructive discussion?. you have reopened an inactive post for ten days to reiterate what has already been said (by telegraphic agreement) and add the obvious (on certain things you fly elegantly), all seasoned with a beautiful criticism.
I personally believe that the forums (this in particular thanks to the excellent work of moderators) are places of exchange of information and mutual growth in the utmost respect for everyone's knowledge! Today you are the one who responds sufficiently to what you feel like an obvious, tomorrow may be another to do it with you, because maybe, (just to make an example) you are not able to create once parametric using an adaptive family, and believe me does not like it.
so well come your contribution but, if I can afford, I would suggest to fix a little shot on tones, honestly as second post is not that you have made it particularly nice......
note for moderators, in case you feel the post somehow inappropriate I apologize early. Thank you.
I've been a lot in doubt if I answer you or not, then since you're in the second post I decided to do it!
I don't question your preparation definitely higher than mine (I never dared to call myself an expert of nothing), much more than the information you provided is absolutely correct, but what did you add to constructive discussion?. you have reopened an inactive post for ten days to reiterate what has already been said (by telegraphic agreement) and add the obvious (on certain things you fly elegantly), all seasoned with a beautiful criticism.
I personally believe that the forums (this in particular thanks to the excellent work of moderators) are places of exchange of information and mutual growth in the utmost respect for everyone's knowledge! Today you are the one who responds sufficiently to what you feel like an obvious, tomorrow may be another to do it with you, because maybe, (just to make an example) you are not able to create once parametric using an adaptive family, and believe me does not like it.
so well come your contribution but, if I can afford, I would suggest to fix a little shot on tones, honestly as second post is not that you have made it particularly nice......
note for moderators, in case you feel the post somehow inappropriate I apologize early. Thank you.