revolution on profile

[grace46]

I tried to find something similar in the discussions but without result, so excuse me if it already existed and I was unable to find it.
I have to draw a cylindrical hairstyle punch with a 45° bevel and connection radius to coniare the pulling bays. the sheet to be drawn is a concave semi-tube then the profile of the bevel of the punch must follow the bending radius of the pipe. I ask kindly help hoping to have been clear in the request being able to provide further info. Of course, thanks to who will answer me.

 

[sampom]

- Yeah.

:smile:

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

or an icon... that makes a miracle

 

[grace46]

I'm sorry, I'm putting my profile on. the curve I think is a sinusoid as it originates from two circumferences to 90° among them. Thanks again

 

[sampom]

I really meant the drawing of the punch you have to realize (the one of your explanation) and that gives you problems. to understand precisely what these problems are, what you cannot do.
I thought I knew it was the connection; You can do it the same way you used in this "concave section" of pipe.

If you explain better we understand and respond better.

:smile:

 

[grace46]

this could be the punch except the profile of the fitting that should follow the curvature of the tube. thanks for the interest and help.

 

[grace46]

If any further information is needed, please tell me or I must think that, as Massivonweizen predicted, an icon is needed... What makes a miracle? is it sw that is not suitable for processing such a profile? help please!

 

[marcof]

If any further information is needed, please tell me or I must think that, as Massivonweizen predicted, an icon is needed... What makes a miracle?

the miracle that Massivonweizen wished was to find questions placed in a clear and exhausting way, accompanied by images, files and what else can serve to those who see for the first time the object of the contender to understand to the first blow what the user needs.
of course miracles happen very rarely

is it sw that is not suitable for processing such a profile?

mah, if my crystal peel correctly interpreted your posts, swx should be able to do what you ask:smile:
I made the connection in the pipe making it at constant width, then I created the punch in the axieme making the connection, even the one with constant width, last. I have not been there to make frills, so much the crystal bowl was drawn to the limit of its possibilities so I could have beaten everything:redface:

 

[grace46]

I thank the crystal mouth which, if drawn to the limit, has exhaustively faced my inability. I believe, in my heart, that sarcastic jokes little have to do with a "technical" site and much less the "santini" in the wake of an answer or a request for "more info". If you compare the two different attitudes of sampom and massivonweizen you can understand what I mean, except then that to the question you answered me!

 

[grace46]

would you be so kind to put back the files in version 2011? Thank you!

 

[marcof]

would you be so kind to put back the files in version 2011? Thank you!

I'm sorry, but I haven't installed it anymore. If I have time tonight, I'll give you a video. described for steps do so:

create the component "punzone" inside the axieme
Draw a circle on a horizontal plane, say about the half-work of the cylinder, and extrude it "to the surface" by choosing the inner face of the cylinder. then project on the top flat face of the cylinder the edge of the hole you have on the tube then extrude it down as you need it to stick under the cylinder. then make the connection to the constant width choosing the two adjacent faces.
similarly make the connection to constant radius on the inside face of the cylinder
the punch as you see it are three features, two extrusions and a fitting.

 

[marcof]

I thank the crystal mouth which, if drawn to the limit, has exhaustively faced my inability. I believe, in my heart, that sarcastic jokes little have to do with a site "technical"

You're not satisfied with the solution, so despite the fact that I have to replicate. . .
sarcastic jokes, and it is still good that it is jokes, born for years in which you read requests for help formulated so that they go from the nebulous to the delusion passing through the picturesque. I mean, when it's okay, you don't understand a bat.
Therefore it goes from if that in a technical forum, from technicians who do not want to receive sarcastic answers, I expect, precisely because they are technical-projects, clarity in the exposure of the questions, also for respect for those who then have to be dismantled to "translate" and provide help.

and less the "santini" in the vex of an answer or a request for "more info". if you compare the two different attitudes of sampom and massivonweizen you can understand what I mean, except that you answered meThanks again!

That's right. I posted the file with the sulution you were looking for, I answered you again explaining the various steps because you can't open the 2012 version and I promised you that if I have time I will also make you a video. It would remain nothing but a slice of c### close to the bone, which is the most tasty part:
you can not hope that in the face of effective solutions and "gratia et amore dei" you do not intended that the questions are at least clearly exposed.
to you it will seem like nothing, but I (and others) have been 10 years that besides swx I have to use also the crystal bowl...

 

[marcof]

would you be so kind to put back the files in version 2011? Thank you!

If I have time tonight, I'll give you a video.

I found time now.
It is however better to project the sketch that creates the hole in the tube and not the edge of the hole on the outer face of the tube as I flew in the video.
[youtube]k0demj5euc8 & feature[/youtube]

 

[Jarno]

You're not satisfied with the solution, so despite the fact that I have to replicate. . .
sarcastic jokes, and it is still good that it is jokes, born for years in which you read requests for help formulated so that they go from the nebulous to the delusion passing through the picturesque. I mean, when it's okay, you don't understand a bat.
Therefore it goes from if that in a technical forum, from technicians who do not want to receive sarcastic answers, I expect, precisely because they are technical-projects, clarity in the exposure of the questions, also for respect for those who then have to be dismantled to "translate" and provide help.

I've always said, you're too good at all:

 

[grace46]

thank you again for the kindness and helpfulness. You don't need the video and I didn't want to waste your time, I thought you could save it in a previous version. on your comment I understand the mood of those who have a life of over 2000 posts, but allow to those who only have about twenty to understand how to move without taking it for the c##lo (which is the most tasty part...). at my young age (66 years) and an experience that ranges from cnc programming (when there were still no computers and calculators with trigonometric functions) to cutting-edge removal processes with advanced technologies, I still have the enthusiasm to try in 3d design. I appreciate who helps me and I'm grateful! Good evening.

 

[grace46]

I wrote while you were posting the video.
thank you very much for the time you have dedicated to me!

 

[grace46]

I also read jarno's comment.
It's another demonstration of what I wrote!