round excess or defect table quota: possible? how?

[reggio]

hi, sometimes I would need to round excess or defect the quota of a table,
I find how to reduce or increase decimals, how to overwrite the share by hand, but not how to round it for example to +/-5 or +/-10 -es. from 3254 to 3250, as instead I can do in cad 2d.

never succeeded?
possible?
How?

 

[graziano-g]

gear, document property, bottom page

 

[reggio]

gear, document property, bottom page

thank you but .. I still need help ..

gear - ok
properties doc - ok
bottom page?

Leave me a help screen shoot? :

 

[graziano-g]

Sorry, I missed a ride, click on odds...

 

[reggio]

Sorry, I missed a ride, click on odds...

I did not understand how to do .. but in any case I fear that with "enlargement" I change all quotas, while I would like to apply rounding only to those I decide,
1401 round
34.8 and 40 instead do not round

say that it is possible or only by hand overwriting? :

 

[Kekkone]

property manager of the quota (on the left), open the curtain and choose rounding to 1,2,3 digits.
you can do for every single quota, if that's what you mean.

 

[Kekkone]

I answer from me...
That's not what you mean.
That's what you've been doing. .

 

[Sp4rk0]

Hi, I think the only way is to set the document with rounding and round it all, and then change the type of rounding on those where you want to see the comma.

you have to operate backwards practically.

 

[reggio]

Hi.
very little practical ... in factable for me - I go hand when it happens, sin

in any case, did you understand how to round +/-5 all odds? I still don't...

 

[graziano-g]

hi, in factable or not this is.
As cleverly stupid as the program may be, it is not able to know what the odds you want are for you to meet certain rounding criteria.
Gear and position of the parameters to set you will find them in the attached images.
Have a good day.
n.b.
of tutorials starting from 0 on the tube if you find that half is enough, within these that treat specific topics very often you grasp shades regarding other topics, a bit like the kansas city move: look on one side but the action takes place on the other side. . .

 

[reggio]

hi, in factable or not this is.
As cleverly stupid as the program may be, it is not able to know what the odds you want are for you to meet certain rounding criteria.

hi, not that it's a novelty, the sw house programmers stopped at the top 5th, fashion and sewing sector, they can't properly write "technique" and if you say "quota" they ask "to what altitude?" no, you don't need artificial intelligence, autocad 2013 (and probably also the previous ones) you genius simply to define the decimals shown and decide rounding for every single quota.

... then when you see that the rounding is planned (thanks, now I have understood => unit but obviously uselessly and translated so ..."round 0.5 away from zero" ... I think about the €6/7000 data and I would give it 7000 sprangate in the head instead no "7000 structural members on the upper floor".

Oh, it's clear, I don't have it with anyone here, and my problem has been solved by a long time ago, it was just to give air to the mouth, a useless rash

thanks to all;-p

 

[graziano-g]

hi, I sw hate it, as far as I am concerned is a bowl, indeed the essence of a bowl, quintessence is reductive....
with sw, unfortunately, I work daily and does not spend a day that I do not find (? ) a new racket in a program that I, I say, consider a solid free hand more than a parametric solid modeler.
too many open doors, too many interpretable things, non-existent sheet environment or better mixed to the solid environment.
We do not talk about the pdm that should assist him but that then discover turn under expolrer with the stability of a ball on the tip of a pin on a ship in the stormy sea.
If sw crashes 4 or 5 times a day is normal... and then I end it here.
Good day

 

[Dum]

I may not understand the question, but if the question is

"I want the quota 1418 (mm) to be rounded at 1420(mm), can you? "

is the question to be wrong (cit.

net of sw problems that, despite being a user for years, I recognize him is the basic concept that leads to your question to be wrong.

It makes no sense (if not for a re-use of a "technique" uses years ago with the 2d ) to draw a particular about leastquasi and then rape the quotas to those that interest you.
the particular if you need 1420 long drawings 1420 and amen.

I don't know your working environment, but if in mechanics (not precision) they drew the pieces with odds "similar but not right" you wouldn't get a single mounting.

for carpenters, as often happens, I draw the sketch with the odds I think correct, then after making the table I go to correct the shot on the model.
to make you a stupid example, if there is a tube with reinforcement placed diagonally between two tubes welded to l (I hope to have been clear) I modify the 3d sketch until on the table there is a decent length for cutting.
I don't know if I've been explained.

attributing to sw the incompetence of rounding quotas to the millimeter is not a problem of sw is the wrong concept.

I hope that at least you've given your doubt about the possibility or not. :

 

[reggio]

the incompetence ... is not a problem of sw
I hope that at least you've given your doubt about the possibility or not. :

... in the diagonal measures of maximum of my light lay-out 1420mm,
in your 1420,9587512463258785235455;-p

... I can change by hand, but if by chance I move the quota, it would be nice to remain real, at the bottom, I repeat, it is not the clean nuclear fusion, autocad 2010 it does...

sw is always my problem - for this I complain

about doubts: no doubt, on sw it is all clear... unfortunately

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

you do not ask to round the decimals, that the program does it by allowing you among other things if to do it in excess or in defect. you are asking to round the units that is very different.
that autocad face is not a parameter of evaluation, with autocad, that is the evolution of the tecnigraph, you can do almost all the porcates that come in mind, exactly like with the tecnigraph.
If you draw a beam to 3254 and want to quote 3250 means that somewhere there is missing material for 4mm; correct the model and you are fine.

 

[reggio]

Okay, bug..

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

you are always talking about decimals, not whole units.
admitting to round all the digits then the triangle is not built without knowing what to be respected.
the gray quotas, I suppose not fundamental, round to what comes (3250 and 2089) and put in brackets. There is little to turn around.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

however you can get the result of having all four whole digits without rounding and simply removing the decimals; to do this just change the 2490 cateto (see template to the right) as from image.
the image is of the design made in autocad, but as you see from the properties the only variation was made on the decimals and not on the rounding of the quotas and this you can do also in solidworks.
so I can answer your request.... here you go! ! !