rounding rope

[matfio]

I don't feel like showing anything and teaching, for the rest I like to understand why things in fact I have reopened a thread that others (borntired) have done just to understand in detail the reasons why to build a string rounding or not.
I personally use it according to the obviousness of the case and see that the results are well appreciated.
of course and I repeat obviously depends on the product
product I mean carpentry-hobbistic-small appliances-medical-machines industrial, etc......

 

[matfio]

rope rounding you can always use it if you want, it is a personal factor or on request from the customer because it is purely aesthetic.
how to say when talking about class surfaces to
What does class a surfaces mean?
you can say many things like they have to have a x degree value, they should not be cut (trimmed) iso u/v must have aligned in certain way, etc.... the point is that they have to be beautiful visually (using the various analysis zebra, light and who has it and more put it)

for formulas or didactic descriptions to realize such surfaces or curves there are books to buy or view the internet I certainly do not have the skills to be a professor

 

[ceschi1959]

Meanwhile, those who opened the discussion can search for documentation and literature from which to demonstrate the importance of the function described.

Since on this subject, as you say, you are absolutely not ironed and your customers even ask you to remove the rays (which have nothing to do with it) because you ask for the 'demonstration of the importance of the function described'?
Are we under examination? once you know, how exhaustively explained Roman lightning, what is a cx and a gx and the influence that has a certain blend on the reflection of the light, would you succeed in doing what matfio and others who use certain functions do?

I greet you cordially and never again resent us

 

[radio]

....
I know that other users are also very interested in both the subject and the skills that in my opinion has shown the borntired user.
......

.... I reopened a thread that others (borntired) did just
......

I am obliged to clarify (there would be no need but ...) that bornitired has certainly not been banished for his true or presumed skills, but for the behavior held.

 

[Utente NX]

ahhh.... now I understand! and it was enough to copy the rest:


or continuity of type "cn" means that the n-th derivative is equal in the two surfaces, that is, that the vector (eg tangency) coincides as direction, towards (vabbé, obviously opposite) and magnitude.
the continuity of type "gn" is a little less stringent, the carrier coincides as direction and direction (opposed), but not in size. that is the norm of the gradient (the verse) coincides, but its determining no.

Clearly. Finally! :wink:

I'm going to go, but I'd like to know how you got him.
I ask you in public because finding a site from a translation in Italian, you have to be 'rights' or hackers. enlighten us.

 

[maxopus]

I'm going to go, but I'd like to know how you got him.
I ask you in public because finding a site from a translation in Italian, you have to be 'rights' or hackers. enlighten us.

fulvio is a wandering mine ... beware of what you post because it does the DNA exam reading what you write :biggrin:

 

[Utente NX]

Since on this subject, as you say, you are absolutely not ironed and your customers even ask you to remove the rays (which have nothing to do with it) because you ask for the 'demonstration of the importance of the function described'?
Are we under examination? once you know, how exhaustively explained Roman lightning, what is a cx and a gx and the influence that has a certain blend on the reflection of the light, would you succeed in doing what matfio and others who use certain functions do?

I greet you cordially and never again resent us

You misunderstood hunter.
because in another area, with the same topic, someone used the forum to create weeds, it has specified that it would be appropriate to remain in the technician and not to fall into who is the best cad.
they are in tune with hunting that gave way to stimulate certain users in entering technical notes (very appreciated by me) and that on this forum they were never born.
So frankly, don't take it.

 

[maxopus]

You misunderstood hunter.
because in another area, with the same topic, someone used the forum to create weeds, it has specified that it would be appropriate to remain in the technician and not to fall into who is the best cad.
they are in tune with hunting that gave way to stimulate certain users in entering technical notes (very appreciated by me) and that on this forum they were never born.
So frankly, don't take it.

Who are you talking about?

 

[Sandra_ME30]

this thread remains closed until the return of hunter.

 

[cacciatorino]

this thread remains closed until the return of hunter.

discussion reopens, we hope that all users are able to remain on the technician without thinking that the requests for explanation and deepening are illicit questions.

for advertising demos there are other channels, here we compare users and all questions are lawful, as well as answers: When you start a discussion saying that you have made some rounding with g1 continuity and g3 flow, I expect someone who wrote it knows what you're talking about, and then I'd be curious to explain it to me too. If you think it's a professional secret not to disclose, then maybe you have a wrong place to discuss.

 

[Fulvio Romano]

I'm going to go, but I'd like to know how you got him.
I ask you in public because finding a site from a translation in Italian, you have to be 'rights' or hackers. enlighten us.

[OT]I was a "white hat" (now no longer for reasons of time), but here is not that I have struggled so much.

the google translator is based on a neural scheme, which has the advantage of being biunivoc. that it was a stinging translation was clear, so doing with google translate the reverse translation I found the original. at that point identifying the origin was trivial.[\OT]

 

[flaviobrio88]

for advertising demos there are other channels, .

If you're referring to me, I can guarantee that mine wasn't a demo.
but I just wanted to show the difference (visual) of a connection in g1 and g4, I also said that I did not know the reason for that difference, and I ceased to do what I liked to show the result clearly.

demos I usually do are very different.

in any case I apologize and remove the video

 

[cacciatorino]

demos I usually do are very different.

in any case I apologize and remove the video

No, no, please, I was referring to all other situations. If I can say so, I find your interventions always very appreciable!

 

[flaviobrio88]

No, no, please, I was referring to all other situations. If I can say so, I find your interventions always very appreciable!

o Mama I again misinterpreted, I provide recovery.
Thank you!

 

[RS4]

Hello colleagues

I intrufolo to show you three different ways of making the rope connection

place iges with 3 surfaces with rays in the following ways

way 1 connection on edge_cordale_g1

mode 2 g1 style fitting

mode 3 g2 style fitting

Hello

♪

 

[ceschi1959]

Hello colleagues

I intrufolo to show you three different ways of making the rope connection

place iges with 3 surfaces with rays in the following ways

way 1 connection on edge_cordale_g1

mode 2 g1 style fitting

mode 3 g2 style fitting

Hello

♪

I'll take a look. we're running behind because I just answered you on nx about the blend corner.
I then saw that on catia ask info on complex surfaces and also there I am putting my nose on.
Let's see if it's possible to get some money somewhere? do you have any proposals? I at the moment not but are available to provide examples or to evaluate, in my little one, some problems.

Hi.

 

[ceschi1959]

allego, as rs4, four ways to achieve chord rounding. In fact they are two, as the first three differ only for the continuity g1, g2, g3, while the fourth (which made me discover matfio) is in g2 of 'bezier'.
in all has been set a rho value of 0.6.
attached also definition of the above parameter, very important in defining this type of surfaces.

 

[Utente NX]

[OT]I was a "white hat" (now no longer for reasons of time), but here is not that I have struggled so much.

the google translator is based on a neural scheme, which has the advantage of being biunivoc. that it was a stinging translation was clear, so doing with google translate the reverse translation I found the original. at that point identifying the origin was trivial.[\OT]

thanks for the information.