Saldature profiled

[drake]

if you do not go to edit the sldlfp file you have no problem with updating because once inserted in the profile the file has no connection with the sldlfp file; in poor words, if you save in 2020 a part with a structural profile the profile file used remains in the 2017 version.

ah ok you in fact charge but then there is no longer the link with the file of the origin profile. . .
for further clarity, when I entered an instrumental profile in the drop-down menus I didn't see anything, they were wanted. I use the profiles in the old way, i.e. those not configured, a profile file for each element variant.
Let's see if something comes out from who uses 2020.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

ah ok you in fact charge

so if in 2020 you give the address of 2017 it works.

then there is no longer the link with the file of the origin profile. . .

There's never been. once the bond is broken, it has always been so

I use the profiles in the old way, i.e. those not configured, a profile file for each element variant.

that only has to do with the management of the folders and not with the version of the software, except they have introduced some sort of check that you specify to use only one of the two methods

 

[drake]

What I said before.
with "ah ok si in fact charge" and with "then there is no longer the link with the file of the profile of origin..." was a confirmation of what you had written in the previous msg.
I did not try again with 2020 x that I have at the moment uninstalled, when I decide to install it again I will try again and I will let you know... Meanwhile thank you.
If someone using 2020 gives me a hit, thank you.

 

[cimaguy]

Excuse me, but how come sometimes when you use the saved profile, the message appears "the library function is empty" from what can it depend on?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Never seen a message like that.
the welding profile should not contain functions, but only the sketch. if you have to create a new profile it is advisable to start from a working one and change it

attach an image of the property manager and the message that appears, the profile and the profile file that tries to analyze the situation.

 

[snake779]

question 1: Do you have configured profiles?

in the image the structure of un configured profile folders
in the case of profiles configured instead of the folder c channel there will have to be one file c channel.sldlfp that contains configurations of the various sizes

summarizing the image:weldment profile is the folder to indicate as path in system optionsHome is the folder that is read in the box standard part property managerc channel is the folder that is read in the box type part property managerc150x521x12 is the profile that is read in the box size part property manager

I have unconfigured profiles. How do I tell solidworks that I want a folder structure for unconfigured profiles?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I have unconfigured profiles. How do I tell solidworks that I want a folder structure for unconfigured profiles?

you do not have to tell it, but place the folders the files as explained previously

 

[drake]

hi guys, I reinstalled sw2020 and after having configured it for benign with my settings, I tried to create a welded structure. well with the classic welds I see my profiles, with the structure system instead I can not load my profiles. no profile appears in the drop-down menus. I'll get you a picture. . .You know what it might depend on?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

can it be that only take configured profiles?

 

[drake]

can it be that only take configured profiles?

Could be, we should check. In the meantime, if someone got some feedback. .

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I studied it for a moment and I deduced that the profile files that are read are those contained in the folder double t and not those in his subfolders.
as in addition to the profile type the size is also asked if a profile file in this way must have the configurations that will be recalled to the size item

 

[drake]

If that's how I think they've got a little bit beaten up, but we're aware of it.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

If that's how I think they've got a little bit beaten up, but we're aware of it.

Perched?

 

[drake]

in the sense that they could also use unconfigured profiles as for normal welding. I never configured them, so I have to do it sooner or later if I want to use that function.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

probably for the architecture of the function use profiles that may be unstructured identically* creates too many problems. is a hypothesis

*How often did you change profile type and see the model pack? to me a lot. can happen if the profile files of the same type are not made starting from a master. with those configured instead I never happened.

 

[drake]

do you intend to change the section within the model after creating welding?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Yes, for example from a heb100 to a heb 120.

with normal profiles sometimes I get rid of everything, perhaps because they were not made starting from the same parent profile; I don't know exactly why, but I know that it does and on a complex structure are pains and blasphemies.
Has it ever happened to you?

 

[drake]

no ever happened this type of pb changing the sketch of the section

 

[cimaguy]

the error message regarding the "empty" function appeared because I had not saved in the correct path.

 

[drake]

the error message regarding the "empty" function appeared because I had not saved in the correct path.

It's not a msg of error anyway. then my files are all positioned with the correct perimeter. I could see that it depends on the fact that the structure system caircas the configured profiles, which I have never implemented.