• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

salome-meca 2010

  • Thread starter Thread starter cacciatorino
  • Start date Start date
Hello hunter,
I also downloaded the 64 bit version and tried to install on spindle 2010 ... the same problem that you have :mad: ... how did I read in the aster code forum ... but I just didn't understand the solution ... some straight?
octinger:smile:
 
OTTINGER said:
Hello hunter,
I also downloaded the 64 bit version and tried to install on spindle 2010 ... the same problem that you have :mad: ... how did I read in the aster code forum ... but I just didn't understand the solution ... some straight?
octinger:smile:
Click to expand...
Are you referring to the problem of failure? they put on the site a version that corrects this problem and others, but it still has someone, I think it's better to wait a bit, this looks like a very beta.... .
 
Thank you! ... I was referring to that of failure! :finger:
... I was a little demoralized ... it goes well that I am not a great expert linux but a little by now the mastic.
I'll wait a few more days... maybe!
Thank you very much and soon!
octinger:biggrin:
 
thanks matteo.f ... downloaded and installed salomeca 2010 and above all solved the graphic problems of herd 2010 ... as I had suggested hunter enough to disable the graphic effects 3d !!!
now I am taking confidence from about 1 week...
do you know where to find examples of wikipedia?
greetings
 
OTTINGER said:
thanks matteo.f ... downloaded and installed salomeca 2010 and above all solved the graphic problems of herd 2010 ... as I had suggested hunter enough to disable the graphic effects 3d !!!
now I am taking confidence from about 1 week...
do you know where to find examples of wikipedia?
greetings
Click to expand...
There are several examples on the caelinux wiki, you can get rid of as long as you want. The only problem is that they are tutorials for older versions of aster, and sometimes it happens that old command files should be changed by hand before they can be opened with eficas editor.
 
thanks hunter,
I have shaken them a bit all the examples ... very interesting but also a little too articulated!
to start I was looking for something step-by-step: for example, beam stuck with load to an extreme.
1: geometry
_
3: constraints and loads
4: results analysis
something like the study4.hdf that I found on the wiki of caelinux, although as soon as I tried to make alone the running of aster does not go to good end ... (the words "ok" final" does not appear and therefore no post pro modulus ...
now I have started from the examples on http://www.salome-platform.org/user-section/salome-tutorials ... missing the part of processor, that will come too!! !
ps: I saw the movie on you tube that you posted I believe last year ... very encouraging !!! meca salome is still for fine palates but the latest versions have had a decided exponential development,
soon
 
cacciatorino said:
There are several examples on the caelinux wiki, you can get rid of as long as you want. The only problem is that they are tutorials for older versions of aster, and sometimes it happens that old command files should be changed by hand before they can be opened with eficas editor.
Click to expand...
I can't find tutorials on the latest versions. . .
to those interested there are also tutorials, in my opinion useful, on the use of salome for pre/post processing, not on code_aster.
http://www.salome-platform.net/user-section/salome-tutorials/copy_of_salome-tutorialOther examples of use are in v docs, i.e. validation tests, code_aster documentation.
 
OTTINGER said:
something like the study4.hdf that I found on the wiki of caelinux, although as soon as I tried to make alone the running of aster does not go to good end ... (the words "ok" final" does not appear and therefore no post pro modulus ...
Click to expand...
2010.1 has a bug on this, if you're using the one you want to download 20102 that seems to me to work normally.

I learned with salome-meca 3.2.9: I was doing the wizard analysis and then I went to read the comm file that the wizard had written. and then for the advanced things, so much forum. I recommend downloading the files that users post on the code-aster forum because they are often illuminating. The caelinux forum I'm just dating, but I think you can make a good fishing too! :wink:
 
... found!
after careful reading of the various bugs on the code-aster forum I found the solution ... trivial but incomprehensible:
in the wizard/linear elasticity window you need to delete the check "interactive follow up" !!!
... let's see if I'm done finding bugs and I can devote myself to using the software...
soon
 
hi to everyone, I joined the forum specifically because I deal with structural calculation and I am using the salome with the codeaster in windows instead of the limited sap. during the many tests, and I get in the last days the first results, I noticed that the aster does not use the specific weights but only module of joung and polka dot, the thing leaves me a little puzzled. but I regret to see that the results are similar to those you know and so for the moment I do not suffer (I throw it there only in case someone knows how to disappoint on the doubt). But I wanted to ask, in the case of two objects supported one on the other (and that therefore they exchange forces) how does it impose on the program that the binding reactions of a body must become the loads of the one below? I'm sorry if I already start with the demands, but I'm a little tight with the times. forgiveness xd
 
p.s. in the meca salome if when we give it the run you do not get the results for the post-pro I saw that it works to do so:
remove the check "interactive follow up" and run, then re-check and run, now the results should appear and on the terminal should comaprire sol the error about the writing of the .mmed and not even of the .rmed.
I don't know if you already knew it, but in doubt ( having had this problem and having solved it - it seems - so) it is better to say it.
I miss saying that the salome-meca I speak of is 5.1.4 and that for windows (not meca) is 5.1.5 with codeaster 9.1 or .2 I don't remember. ;
 
UL80 said:
with codeaster 9.1 or .2 I don't remember.. ;
Click to expand...
This version of code_aster is antidiluvian. You better use a new one on linux.

relative to other questions, you can do everything you ask, but you have to use the eficas editor and manually compose the command file (*.comm).

with the wizard included in salome-meca you can only do linear static analysis on single pieces, with one or more bound surfaces and one or more pressured surfaces. For everything that exhales from these trivial cases, you have to use eficas.
 
Actually, I realized that the meca wizard wasn't suitable, but not conscinding all the eficas commands well (and the fact that they're in French doesn't help) sent me in confuction on how to assign that sequence of commands. from what I have understood of the program I should impose noeu sign of binding reactions as loads for the solid below, correct me if I say chestnuts. but then these reactions to the knots where they apply, that is, the surface on which they go into contact is not said to have the knots in the same position as the one that transmits the loads. and how do I translate this into eficas? If I can make a structural model a minimum complex I promise I will make a tutorial.. xd
 
UL80 said:
Actually, I realized that the meca wizard wasn't suitable, but not conscinding all the eficas commands well (and the fact that they're in French doesn't help) sent me in confuction on how to assign that sequence of commands. from what I have understood of the program I should impose noeu sign of binding reactions as loads for the solid below, correct me if I say chestnuts. but then these reactions to the knots where they apply, that is, the surface on which they go into contact is not said to have the knots in the same position as the one that transmits the loads. and how do I translate this into eficas? If I can make a structural model a minimum complex I promise I will make a tutorial.. xd
Click to expand...
Actually, no, if you just have to apply to the solid under the effort that comes from the solid above you just have to impose a liaison_mail between two surfaces. If you want to study contact, you need to add a defi_contact. In both cases it is not necessary that nodes be coincident.

However, I think you have to study a lot, and code_aster has a syntax far from simple.

the best thing you can do is download a few tutorials from the caelinux wiki (I did one too) and study it, as well as beat the forum in length and wide www.code-aster.org looking for keywords. consider that often comm files written for old versions of c.a. They don't go on newer versions, so they're updated.

p.s.
for arguments not related to the title, it should open a new discussion.
 
Hello,
maybe a starting point to help you understand the syntax of eficas, aster and what else can be the file that I attach ... at least I try ... and that still you find on the site www.code-aster.org ...
just allow me a joke ... not enough to speak in French ... you must start thinking like the French! :biggrin:

Oct.
 

Attachments

OTTINGER said:
Hello,
maybe a starting point to help you understand the syntax of eficas, aster and what else can be the file that I attach ... at least I try ... and that still you find on the site www.code-aster.org ...
just allow me a joke ... not enough to speak in French ... you must start thinking like the French! :biggrin:

Oct.
Click to expand...
I think an Italian did this pdf!

Still wanting there is also the wonderful tutorial made by a certain hunter:biggrin: :
http://www.caelinux.org/wiki/index.php/contrib:cacciatorinoBut I think it doesn't turn with the latest versions of aster, you have to make some small changes to the comm file.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 0 (members: 0, guests: 0)
Back
Top