search for advice

[Brethil]

Bye to all,
I write because I would need a golden advice...
while boating me between the pruners guide and the forum, I struggle to see a solution for my problem; that more than of a "technical" nature, it concerns perhaps one more of a "practical-organizational" nature.

My work is to create giant cooling towers, and until now, thanks to the practice, our legendary forum, your precious help and a thousand blasphemies went well; I have created my parts, assembled in assemblies, bolted the world through the cc vice and occasionally added parts to the cc by publishing them at duty etc...

Now, the problem is:

understand how to proceed from now on;
I am a single user and I do not use inventor projects; I have already created 3 types of my towers and every "project" is an independent folder on the server contenting all its part, subsassieme, design etc... to the final axieme. . .
a stuff like that.
"to return to"------> containing the following under folders:
Parts
Axioms
drawing drawings
for each of these projects I have created my own parts by making copies where the files I needed were identical to those of the other projects...for example, sheet panels, collectors, handles etc... special "standard"...

always for each of these projects I took advantage of cc (which is unlike is work resident in the classic folder:
"c:\documents and settings\tecnico1\my documents\inventor\content center files\r2011\it-it"in which I also published for convenience certain parts of viteria not present in the cc.

Now I wonder, as in the future I will have to create dozens and dozens of towers, how should I act? also taking into account the fact of future formatting, or files.iam passages to customers and suppliers. . .

I have hypothesized several things:

1) add to my library all the components but just all and then create the final assemblies of the towers instituting from the cc to have assemblies with low weight.

2) continue to do as done until now, i.e. taking only the vice from the cc and creating projects each with their own independent files.

3) create me an archive of extra cc parts (so also viteria) and create my towers assemblies, instituting from this archive.

What is the best option? Help me, please!!!!

In practice I could continue like this, but the idea of having all the pieces in a library and using them at my liking I care a lot, even if then I don't know how to behave if I was to have to change the "pippo" panel that is present maybe in 10 different towers. . .

and again, the pack & go, which I’m trying to study, I understand that it offers the possibility to create a copy of my work while having the files that make up it that are resident in different points (bullying in cc, the rest in my folders on the server); But I can't understand how to use it to get to this result without problems.. .

I mean, it's all a long time to tell you that I don't know exactly how to boat me between these things...

would there be some pious soul that could give me a push??? ? :biggrin:

Thanks again and apologize for the misuse of characters ^________________^

 

[3°minore]

I can tell you what I do...
Today I use vault that allows me to manage quite comfortably revisions etc., until 2009 instead I used a project folder on the server containing all ipt files, idw and iam named according to the same encoding.
this obviously to avoid having so many copies of a same design.
the center contained I use it little and exclusively for the viteria.
for drawings use a numbered encoding.

greetings

 

[meccanicamg]

the contained center only serves for the vice, but it does not mean anything to take the vice from a folder or from the cc. as repeated several times is only a tool that creates the vine of such made so and so and then saves it somewhere!! !

 

[VigZ]

if you expect to remain single user continues so and deepen what you did not understand about the packandgo.
You'll live well.

the only note is to use the inv project for each project folder, let them point the folder containing the project files and the cc

 

[Brethil]

if you expect to remain single user continues so and deepen what you did not understand about the packandgo.
You'll live well.

the only note is to use the inv project for each project folder, let them point the folder containing the project files and the cc

Hello, Vigz.
In fact I expect to remain single user for a long time, if not even for eternity eh :biggrin:

so you suggest to continue as now and turn my project folders into inventor projects, that is instead of opening my project (x example) "torrea" and working on it, turning it into "torrea.ipj" thus always pointing inventor to the same folder but as a single user x project; Right?
I also suggest that I also point to the cc and mylibrary (which I already use because I have published parts) when I impose the project in the creation phase.

summing up:
I will continue to create folders.ipj and I will put you in all the files that I need to structure them as I had indicated in the main post, but with the difference that from now on will be projects managed by inventor.

Then I study the pack & go well, so in the future he took me to copy whole projects from one pigeon to another or send entire projects to customers and suppliers.

In essence I will no longer need a gender archive from which to instigate all pieces, but I will only instigate bolts from cc and standard parts from mylibrary, which I have already configured for use.

I hope to have understood and done everything correctly, for sure I place you pictures of how I interpreted your precious advice...if you can give him an eye you do me a favor...to scanti equivoci..eh eh

In the meantime, I run to study the pack & go.

Thank you very much:finger:

_

 

[VigZ]

In essence, yes, I see bad pictures because I'm on the laptop but I would say yes

 

[Brethil]

In essence, yes, I see bad pictures because I'm on the laptop but I would say yes

thanks again for patience and availability; At least now I know how to set my jobs for the future. missing the pack & go, after which I will be much more serene.

_