set classical work area in autocad architecture 2012

[Tocci]

Good evening,

So: every time I open cad 2012 I have autocad display 2012 3d etc etc.

to put that classic I have to: go to options > profile > click on "autocad". Then, I can choose the classic display of autocad.

without doing that above mentioned passage I have no other way. (in the tucked hammer on the lower right does not appear directly "classic autocad".

someone could tell me how to "save" the latest changes made, making sure that every time I reopen cad should not do that process to display the classic cad??

thanks in advance =)

 

[Tristan]

you should learn how to use the new interface.. .

 

[Giuseppe Mauro]

Have you tried (when you changed the interface) to save the blank design as acad.dwt and acadiso.dwt?
I don't know if it works, but it's easy to try.

 

[rpor66]

the preset of the type of workspaces to use the edits through the command to which, you find the menu to tree workspaces, selections autocad classic and by right button set it as current.

bye

 

[Tocci]

the preset of the type of workspaces to use the edits through the command to which, you find the menu to tree workspaces, selections autocad classic and by right button set it as current.

bye

when I go on which, i.e. "personality user interface" though, I don't find autocad classic.
in the curtain the first title I find is: "work areas" but among the options I give myself "architecture - dafault (current) "

 

[Tristan]

this because you have installed autocad architecture and not autocad... I repeat: try to get used to the ribbon quickly because the classic work area will not be there forever! free advice...

 

[Giuseppe Mauro]

Tristan, you're in the middle of it, do you have any noises that the classic display will disappear?

 

[liber]

who knows why then someone after gives the right procedure to put the classic screen, or or someone else a free ubitmenu application for office 2007 then that will give you the classic screen.
therefore of the two the one or the users prefer the classic, or who makes programs like ubitmenu, or the procedures necessary for architecture to have the classical screen do not have a pipe to do.
for me well come these people.

 

[Tristan]

Tristan, you're in the middle of it, do you have any noises that the classic display will disappear?

si per fortuna :biggrin:

 

[Tristan]

who knows why then someone after gives the right procedure to put the classic screen, or or someone else a free ubitmenu application for office 2007 then that will give you the classic screen.
therefore of the two the one or the users prefer the classic, or who makes programs like ubitmenu, or the procedures necessary for architecture to have the classical screen do not have a pipe to do.
for me well come these people.

I didn't understand anything :36_1_5:

 

[Giuseppe Mauro]

I believe that liber wanted to say that classical displayzoine, in front of the ribbon, is so much demanded by the user, to uncomfortable resources and even appropriate programs to restore it.

For example, I find that the ribbon interface of autocad is very uncomfortable and above all it takes a part of the working era that I normally maximize by minimizing the number of icons.
with the ribbon you can't do it. that you have 1 or 20 buttons, always that ribbon height you have to occupy (at the disadvantage of the work area).

 

[Tristan]

with the ribbon you can't do it. that you have 1 or 20 buttons, always that ribbon height you have to occupy (at the disadvantage of the work area).

That's not true. to the right of the name of the last card there is a button that allows to "glue" or reduce the ribbon to the only simple titles of the cards, maximizing the drawing area

 

[Giuseppe Mauro]

and from the tristan..
you want to put 16 pixels in height of fixed icons there, with the huge ribbon that opens and closes under the eyes.. .
I repeat, maybe for the "new" users, the ribbon is a convenience.
but for those who are accustomed to the minimal interface (but efficient), the ribbon becomes a weight.
then maybe with time you get used to it, no one doubts it. but an account is getting used to (abdicating that in the face of an unshared choice), another account is being excited about it.

 

[numero1]

in fact I started to use only the ribbon because I had heard this novelty, but another thing is to say that it is beautiful and useful.
It's not like... :
I always regret your phrase tristan:http://www.cad3d.it.cloud.seeweb.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=23013last post of this page of this 3ad.
Now something is thrown away... and something important as well.
Hi.

p.s.
I'm sorry for the oct

 

[Tristan]

Now something is thrown away... and something important as well.

No! attention, I have never said that menu and toolbar are sold; I talked about the "classical" work area. Can you build a working area from scratch? Well, you'll be able to create your classic interface. who can't help customizing the user interface is fucked, if he keeps it with ribbons. I don't know if I have explained better now...:biggrin:

 

[Tristan]

for example I find that the ribbon interface of autocad is very uncomfortable

unfortunately autocad does not use ribbons in a smart way such as revit or autocad architecture or autocad civil 3d. I have the possibility, touching an object, to immediately display a context card with the commands dedicated to it I find it priceless!
then clearly....de gustobus... .

 

[Giuseppe Mauro]

Can you build a working area from scratch? Well, you'll be able to create your classic interface. who can't help customizing the user interface is fucked, if he keeps it with ribbons. I don't know if I've explained better now...

Yes, you've explained better.
Then I saved myself:

I have the possibility, touching an object, to immediately display a context card with the commands dedicated to it I find it priceless!

Yes, it works when the mind behind the mouse is linear, and the programmer can somehow predict what the user might want to do, or when the actions are limited.
But I think it wouldn't work with me. at least on autocad.
I click on a pline... What are you showing me? All the controls! from wheel to size, from color to area, from ucs to explosions. :biggrin: it would take 3 ribbon files to guess what I want at that time. And maybe... I was just looking for the id command for the exact coordinates of the end of the :biggrin:

 

[numero1]

No! attention, I have never said that menu and toolbar are sold; I talked about the "classical" work area. Can you build a working area from scratch? Well, you'll be able to create your classic interface. who can't help customizing the user interface is fucked, if he keeps it with ribbons. I don't know if I have explained better now...:biggrin:

I understand... another customization to do, at this point I hold the ribbons and take off from everything.
Hello and thank you

 

[liber]

have removed the native vba, and now you find it as a form in the download section, who knows why? Who uses the vba!
togleranno the classic menu, surely they will insert it as a module too
the only thing that is included in the installation package and benefits a lot, after installation one has to go to change it, because you do not see the bonus tools, vabbè with autocad 2004 there was the installation aside, but now it is only a check.
bonus tools instead seem to have disappeared from architecture, as well as an irony way to put back the "classic of autocad", (I do not use it but there are those who use it and have taken a look) what I asked myself is that it seems that these "problems" call them so they are only with architecture, perhaps because autodesk wants to push revit? that among other things is very similar to archicad? then a user base to competition of the old archicad?
mha! !

 

[Tristan]

What I asked myself is that it seems that these "problems" we call them so they are only with architecture

That's not true. also autocad civil 3d no longer has any "classical" work area

Seal perchè autodesk vuole spingers revit?

that autodesk pushes so much on revit is not a mystery

that among other things is very similar to archicad? therefore a user base to competition of old man archicad?

old man? ?