You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Tristan
Guest
am4! :biggrin:I can only tell you he was in the lecco area.
undoubtedly; These are not the things that make an instructor a bad or bad instructor! to have us... good, not bad...also because it seemed like a good jaw
the thing is very trivial.. I don't know if you noticed that the view camera has 4 circular "grips" on the sides of the pane. enlarge view means increase the field angle, then change the focus!Can you tell me how?
autocad and autocad architecture (in the latest release) for what concerns rendering are almost identical!Davyd80 said:Unfortunately I think it is a little different (I use auotcad architecture 2011 that uses mental ray). .
Tristan
Guest
Yes, it is. the engine is the same, but of course 3ds has a greater number of parameters for the set.Okay. . was just to specify what I used, but also 3ds uses mental ray, but the settings are a little different :d
Davyd80
Guest
the thing is very trivial.. I don't know if you noticed that the view camera has 4 circular "grips" on the sides of the pane. enlarge view means increase the field angle, then change the focus!
but in this way you cut the image, you do not change or point of view or opening the room.. .
the image is exactly the same, only that you see what you want.. .
but in this way you cut the image, you do not change or point of view or opening the room.. .
the image is exactly the same, only that you see what you want.. .
Tristan
Guest
the point of view changes it in at least 2 ways: either from the view in the plant or with steering wheel; the field angle manages it from the blue grips...but in this way you cut the image, you do not change or point of view or opening the room.. .
the image is exactly the same, only that you see what you want.. .
...because I gave you the input, I don't want to waste time trying to convince you of what I say. Instead we do so, I joked, the attached image I created it with photoshop and I confirm that the goal of the revit chamber is fixed at 35mm (which then I would like to know how they calculated the focal, since in revit there is nowhere a "focus distance" parameter, not even read-only).
Davyd80
Guest
How irony!the point of view changes it in at least 2 ways: either from the view in the plant or with steering wheel; the field angle manages it from the blue grips...
...because I gave you the input, I don't want to waste time trying to convince you of what I say. Instead we do so, I joked, the attached image I created it with photoshop and I confirm that the goal of the revit chamber is fixed at 35mm (which then I would like to know how they calculated the focal, since in revit there is nowhere a "focus distance" parameter, not even read-only).
cmq the topic of my discussion was not the focus of the revit chamber, me the rendering settings of autocad architecture 2011
If no one can tell me this is useless to get lost in other speeches. . .
incasinata
Guest
:36_1_12: boys....you are under control!
I recommend that you keep civilian tones. .
I recommend that you keep civilian tones. .
GP.
Guest
I understand that my interventions were really fried air. ....the topic of my discussion was not the focus of the revit chamber, me the rendering settings of autocad architecture 2011If no one can tell me It is useless to get lost in other speeches. . .
Since I trust tristan when he says that "autocad and autocad architecture (in the latest release) for what concerns rendering are almost identical", it is obvious that you have not even tried, even with the defaults you would have got decent results.
Then the possible settings are all in the windows of those three commands I suggested to you, but you also have to strive to do some tests. :smile:
Toh, sometimes the parts reverse... :tongue:::36_1_12: boys....you are under control!
Tristan
Guest
irony aside...it seems to me (as says gp) that the councils have been given to you but you continue uncleaned on your way. Have you tried what you were advised or not?How irony!
Davyd80
Guest
the councils ok... I tried them and they are fine, but they were also the most obvious things I had already set. . .irony aside...it seems to me (as says gp) that the councils have been given to you but you continue uncleaned on your way. Have you tried what you were advised or not?
Of course I have to light the sun, and put the sky, but I would need other settings especially for the global illumination and the final gather.
the power of the sun, the multiplier coefficient (or something like that, now I have not under the eye of light rays)
I also know that the settings change from drawing to drawing, but I'm not asking for the perfect formula!
I just want someone who made an outside rendering to tell me the impressions he put in a drawing... then if they will be different patience.. .