Maybe you should think about a cad 3d! autocad does not meet 3d modeling needs or better you could do it but it is a real casino!:finger:Hello everyone
I am asking for help to shape the bottom of a violin of which I attach a draft of sections 2d.
Someone would give me directions on the procedure.
Thank you in advance
carry


There you are:Hello
have you already dealt with the topic I see, for construction or for teaching?
I would like to have a stl to study it a bit.....mclisp61@gmail.comyou would also give me the link of the "fresh"
Thank you.
http://rapidshare.com/files/432630653/violino.rarThank you
I downloaded the file but with the password you sent me returns the following error:
! c:\users\mauro\desktop\violins.rar: crc failed in the encrypted file model.stl (wrong password ?)
Hi.
I'll send you a pvt.
the base of your violin will never play because it lacks a whole series of details that will eventually make the difference. (see photos). according to me the correct approach will be to scan a correct body, made to manina by a luthier, and only from this to trace the right sections. . .
In fact, the luthier starts from those sections, the "quinte" and the "sesta" to shape the external face of the bottom (or of the table) after which with references to its model and the thicknesses in correspondence of those sections realize the internal excavation determining. obtaining therefore with a cad the theoretical 3d model of the harmonic table or of the bottom starting from those curves is formally correct.
It doesn't rain on that. make a form with beautiful curves continuous respecting the parameters of that violin model (here, thirst and thickness) as a good liutaire is not trivial at allI can confirm that it is far from easy to start modeling a form like this...
the luthier will also leave from those sections but we want to use them a cad environment then we have to reason differently; In fact, those sections are not in themselves wrong, but they must only be considered as a reference. if we use them as they are forced the designer to produce a series of surfaces with evident points of singularity as well as a whole series of other problems.In fact, the luthier starts from those sections, the "quinte" and the "sesta" to shape the external face of the bottom (or of the table) after which with references to its model and the thicknesses in correspondence of those sections realize the internal excavation determining. obtaining therefore with a cad the theoretical 3d model of the harmonic table or of the bottom starting from those curves is formally correct.
right, but the final result must be those sections in those positions, for what I said is not a simple modeling at all. I think it's hard for you to leave, somehow, the "here" and the "sesta".the luthier will also leave from those sections but we want to use them a cad environment then we have to reason differently; In fact, those sections are not in themselves wrong, but they must only be considered as a reference. if we use them as they are forced the designer to produce a series of surfaces with evident points of singularity as well as a whole series of other problems.
I think the approach must be different. I'll give a brief idea. Just give me the time to verify that it is not a "holiday". ..:finger:
Among other things, I was looking right now, that those sections are wrong because the thickness of the body is not constant, in fact to produce the correct harmonics there are a series of shortcomings that the liutaire inserts using the chiselright, but the final result must be those sections in those positions, for what I said is not a simple modeling at all. I think it's hard for you to leave, somehow, the "here" and the "sesta".
those sections represent the body of the bottom of the violin before working the internal surface to obtain the definitive thicknesses. more than anything else are wrong just for the form they have, especially the 4 external scenes at the edge.Among other things, I was looking right now, that those sections are wrong because the thickness of the body is not constant, in fact to produce the correct harmonics there are a series of shortcomings that the liutaire inserts using the chisel
It is clear that you cannot transfer the manual processing process of a maple block to the cad to obtain the finished bottom of the violin. to the cad you must have as references the shape of the plant, the quintes and the sixth. as it arrives to the final form is obviously not related to the operations that make the liuthier.here are the steps to do so analogically; if you try to reproduce them pedissequamente a cad do not get anything goodhttp://www.violini.net/costruzione_violino_03.html
They are less rare than you think. search on cad3d under "proserpine cloves"If you do everything to cad following the abc of the cad you still get nothing good...
I think it's one of those rare cases that the cad "if the lap in the bag." .
would be a good exercise and however it would be a fake also a background or a harmonic table of reconstructed violin starting from a 3d scan, model cad 3d and working on the cam. the adjustments that are made in the thicknesses working the internal face of the harmonic table and bottom depend on the answer of the wood and therefore on the "manic" of the liuthier.different is the didactic speech... on this point we can embroide over what we want... there are some systems to make a "fake violin"