sheet metal parts.

[graziano-g]

I read:
.... maybe he has to bend the details separately and then once welded work them... What do we know? exact, but I didn't specify it.or his method of work is optimal with the work together and then he forgot, or he didn't know he could do it, propagate them to the parts.now thanks to you I know...... or its working method is optimal, if by optimal means it is purely theoretical i.e. ideal then yes, it is not required decimal precision, as long as it is a particular aesthetic/functional therefore the dimensional and geometric precision in this case is a detail as long as they both have the same error. goes from itself that after cutting, set the bending depth, the folds are equal..... if you attach a drawing file without part does not serve anything and also a dxf without bend lines or bending data does not serve anything. This is also true, it is cassation, it is not discussed.
onyx68 writes: I looked at your details. Obviously you started a part of the modeling in the single then you continued the work together. exact
some references jump, patience, what matters is the result.
Thank you.

 

[graziano-g]

anyway both kind, thanks to the vs answers I solved and learned something more.
Good weekend.
p.s. already sent to the cut, at finished work I will make sure to remember to post the result.
Hi.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

first of all thanks to all for the patient kindness granted.
My " doesn't work " is actually a : I wasn't able. the result is the same but the cause is different. Sorry...

This is the meaning the result remains the same, you do not know how to operate and therefore cannot correct you. you are not able to get flattening of the sheet.. Okay, write what you're doing and where you're blocking, if there are error messages, in what work you work, what you use.....

I had not propagated the processing to the parts... .
I ask for mercy in the penalty.

this could be a development problem, but if as you affirm in the next post

Maybe he has to bend the details separately and then once welded work them... What do we know?

exact, but I didn't specify it

the processing you do after joining the plates then the propagation should not be done.

 

[graziano-g]

hi, if it wasn't clear I managed to get the two flattened parts then the dxf to send to the cut following the indications: propagates processing to parts.in any way below the summary:
The objective, as we know, is in the 1st image.
I traced the inner shape of the sheet (200x405, only important starting parameters ), I extruded it for 250 mm, so I generated a sketch to determine the cutting geometry, I gave thickness to the 1^ surface so I cut it with the 2^ surface holding both parts in separate files then converted into sheet metal.
I created a set in which I inserted the 2 parts -grezze - in order to proceed to the definitive modeling with relative variants in course of work.
I have therefore determined the shape and size of subsequent processing directly in the axieme.
during the execution of the various processes I did not propagate these to the parts, as said several times, so because of this I did not get the flattened following this I wrote: it does not work instead _ I have not been able to. . .
applied then the propagation option all solved, I got the flattened of the parts even if then there appeared messages concerning reconstruction errors and lack of external references that did not prevent me from getting the dxf for cutting.
certain correctness would impose on you to resolve errors or messages of attention but being a component to perform once a tantum as quickly as possible I did not consider it appropriate to investigate where, how or what generates messages. I'll do it later.
for those who want an attachment can find work.
Bye.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

at the cost of seeming annoying I repeat that flattening is also obtained without propagation to the parts. in fact it was already obtained on the first file.
what you do not explain is the process to make flattening; If it's just pressing the flattened icon I don't see the problem. If it is about making flattening table the speech is different, but I see from your files that lack development configuration and then the table you did not.
I clarify that there is no controversy in all this, only love for clarity of understanding.

because you want to work with surfaces, with 4 functions, to get that solid, 2 functions, or even better already of sheet metal, it is dark to me. but just the piece goes into production. . .

 

[graziano-g]

the flattening did it, only that the geometry was without subsequent processing: 1^ image rather than 2^
I couldn't get the flattened con le lavorazioni, not flattened in itself (but I did not specify it clearly. . ), maybe I was wrong or jumped some command, I don't remember. when I make the table anyway, even without having generated the development configuration, among the proposed views still appears the flat repetition though to get the dxf it is enough to export dxf/dwg from the part then generate a design/file acad for cutting and fold naturally complete with quotated fold lines and quotas for checking the real size.I understand. that is not polemical, that is another thing, you are reasoning and trying to help /capire (even if understanding for me is a big word...;-)) ) regarding then the dark side, you just have to choose between that of Lord Fener or that of the moon. Thank you, good day

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Okay. thanks to the clarifications

 

[graziano-g]

consistent duty, but you want more info do not hesitate.
Have a good day.