gfrank
Guest
skiing: first clarifications from the ministry of simplification
the first clarifications on the trail come from an explanatory note written by the Ministry's legislative office for legislative simplification, in response to the request for clarifications submitted by the local and urban council member of the lombardia region.
the head of the office, cons. giuseppe chinè is expressed about the scope of application to the building matter of the provisions contained in article 49 of Law n.122 of 2010 and related to the certified reporting of beginning activity.
so many perplexities that the introductory law of the trail has generated in professionals and public offices, for now 5 replies from the government. We see, in reference to the document in question, what are the issues related to the concrete application of the law and what the answers.
1. application of the trail in building
the first and fundamental doubt concerns the application of the trail to the building. It was born of the general character of the norm and its object, foreign to the building sector, that is: the simplification of the authorisation procedures for the opening of new productive activities. the thesis of extraneity of l. 122/2010 to the building sector was corroborated by the fact that it, neither makes explicit reference to this area and to the licences that regulate it, nor modifies t.u. 380/2001.
the answer on this, argued in several points, is well firm: the "applicability of the discipline of certified reporting of start-up activity to the building sector can only find positive response". and this, firstly, comes from what is written in the text of the law, in the 4-ter paragraph of Article 49, which in fact introduces "an automatic mechanism of substitution of the discipline of the ski to that of the god, also in construction". this, in fact, is particularly clear in some lines of the same paragraph, in which we read that the discipline of the ski "replaces directly, from the date of entry into force of the law of conversion of this decree, that of declaration of beginning activity carried out by all state and regional regulations".
2. skiing and super-dia.
another problem concerns the interpretative doubts about the extension of the trail to the so-called super-dia, or to the god in exchange for permission to build. This perplexity, also raised by the attitude, springs once again from the lack of links between new legislation and what established by t.u.e.
the answer is clear: the trail has the same field of application of the dia and does not interfere with that of other qualification. Therefore, extending the trail to the super god, or rather to the alternative god to the permission to build, would mean going beyond those limits and expanding the scope of application of the trail beyond the boundaries established by law. in conclusion the god cannot replace the so-called super god.
3. regional legislation
the third clarification is related to the previous one and concerns the relationship between the new discipline and the regional laws carrying additional applications of alternative god to the permission to build.
also in this case it reiterates how expressed at the previous point, that is: "In this regard, it is a notice of the office writer, that the discipline of the trail does not apply to the permission to build and that the regional laws in force (...) were not affected by the entry into force of Article 49 of Law No.122 of 2010".
4. interventions first authorized with dia, in presence of constraints
Another problem of interpretation of the law arises for those interventions to be carried out in areas affected by constraints and that the law submitted to god. in particular, the measure, excluding the application of the trail if there is the existence of environmental, landscape and cultural constraints, and establishing - with the replacement of the god with the trail - the extinction of the first, generated the doubt that for this type of interventions, first authorized with god, now it is necessary to resort to the permission to build.
with the explanatory note it is clarified that for the zones subjected to constraint the trail, in substitution of the dia, as long as it is acquired in advance and attach to it the act of withdrawal of the institution responsible for the protection of the bond.
It should be noted, however, that, as established by 122/2010, the trail does not apply in cases where environmental, landscape and cultural constraints exist.
5. before the entry into force of 122/2010
The last problem concerns the building gods already presented. It is clear that the legislation in force applies to them at the time of presentation of the same, save the possibility for the private to avail himself of the new instrument by presenting, for the same intervention, a trail.
source:http://www.professionearchitetto.it...iarimenti-dal-ministero-della-semplificazione
the first clarifications on the trail come from an explanatory note written by the Ministry's legislative office for legislative simplification, in response to the request for clarifications submitted by the local and urban council member of the lombardia region.
the head of the office, cons. giuseppe chinè is expressed about the scope of application to the building matter of the provisions contained in article 49 of Law n.122 of 2010 and related to the certified reporting of beginning activity.
so many perplexities that the introductory law of the trail has generated in professionals and public offices, for now 5 replies from the government. We see, in reference to the document in question, what are the issues related to the concrete application of the law and what the answers.
1. application of the trail in building
the first and fundamental doubt concerns the application of the trail to the building. It was born of the general character of the norm and its object, foreign to the building sector, that is: the simplification of the authorisation procedures for the opening of new productive activities. the thesis of extraneity of l. 122/2010 to the building sector was corroborated by the fact that it, neither makes explicit reference to this area and to the licences that regulate it, nor modifies t.u. 380/2001.
the answer on this, argued in several points, is well firm: the "applicability of the discipline of certified reporting of start-up activity to the building sector can only find positive response". and this, firstly, comes from what is written in the text of the law, in the 4-ter paragraph of Article 49, which in fact introduces "an automatic mechanism of substitution of the discipline of the ski to that of the god, also in construction". this, in fact, is particularly clear in some lines of the same paragraph, in which we read that the discipline of the ski "replaces directly, from the date of entry into force of the law of conversion of this decree, that of declaration of beginning activity carried out by all state and regional regulations".
2. skiing and super-dia.
another problem concerns the interpretative doubts about the extension of the trail to the so-called super-dia, or to the god in exchange for permission to build. This perplexity, also raised by the attitude, springs once again from the lack of links between new legislation and what established by t.u.e.
the answer is clear: the trail has the same field of application of the dia and does not interfere with that of other qualification. Therefore, extending the trail to the super god, or rather to the alternative god to the permission to build, would mean going beyond those limits and expanding the scope of application of the trail beyond the boundaries established by law. in conclusion the god cannot replace the so-called super god.
3. regional legislation
the third clarification is related to the previous one and concerns the relationship between the new discipline and the regional laws carrying additional applications of alternative god to the permission to build.
also in this case it reiterates how expressed at the previous point, that is: "In this regard, it is a notice of the office writer, that the discipline of the trail does not apply to the permission to build and that the regional laws in force (...) were not affected by the entry into force of Article 49 of Law No.122 of 2010".
4. interventions first authorized with dia, in presence of constraints
Another problem of interpretation of the law arises for those interventions to be carried out in areas affected by constraints and that the law submitted to god. in particular, the measure, excluding the application of the trail if there is the existence of environmental, landscape and cultural constraints, and establishing - with the replacement of the god with the trail - the extinction of the first, generated the doubt that for this type of interventions, first authorized with god, now it is necessary to resort to the permission to build.
with the explanatory note it is clarified that for the zones subjected to constraint the trail, in substitution of the dia, as long as it is acquired in advance and attach to it the act of withdrawal of the institution responsible for the protection of the bond.
It should be noted, however, that, as established by 122/2010, the trail does not apply in cases where environmental, landscape and cultural constraints exist.
5. before the entry into force of 122/2010
The last problem concerns the building gods already presented. It is clear that the legislation in force applies to them at the time of presentation of the same, save the possibility for the private to avail himself of the new instrument by presenting, for the same intervention, a trail.
source:http://www.professionearchitetto.it...iarimenti-dal-ministero-della-semplificazione