• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

solid modeling or surfaces? ? ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mtbnicola
  • Start date Start date

mtbnicola

Guest
I can not properly shape the object in photo, I started with solid modeling but I can not have a satisfactory result.
I do not know whether to continue on this road or to start modeling with the surfaces.
What do you recommend?
 

Attachments

  • tr10591_big.webp
    tr10591_big.webp
    18.3 KB · Views: 62
What is it? seems to be an element of some kind of particular chain. I'd like to be able to quote to see if I could help you. Can you post some sketches with some share? What approach have you used so far? Did you use sweep and loft with driving curves?
 
you're a mesh of a chain like "marina."
This is how I managed to do with solid modeling.
 

Attachments

without reference quotas came a little so. .
only solid modeling.
 

Attachments

  • Anello_Catena_Navale.webp
    Anello_Catena_Navale.webp
    15.5 KB · Views: 45
restlessly draw these particles with double hole. You feel watched. with the single hole instead I try an unconsulted gaudio.
I shaped it from these two surfaces. It may be that my solution does not make text. If he did, alert me: I will ask that my solution without glory be covered by copyright.
 

Attachments

  • maglia_marina.pdf
    maglia_marina.pdf
    155.6 KB · Views: 52
  • Cattura.webp
    Cattura.webp
    3.8 KB · Views: 16
  • Cattura2.webp
    Cattura2.webp
    17.4 KB · Views: 19
on this particular I had a creative block...a deformed sphere with addition of asola and rounds did not bring anything, the street of mad76 seems better, but I have not yet tried.
if I read, the others who have followed?

p.s.
Better "looks" is not enough to justify a patent! :
 
I used a similar approach to crowd 76 but with 2 lofts and using solid modeling. I've been working on it a bit longer using the photo as a sketch image, so now the proportions are realistic. I didn't even get to do the kind of heel that you see in the center... :wink:
 

Attachments

  • Anello_Catena_Navale_1.webp
    Anello_Catena_Navale_1.webp
    17.3 KB · Views: 36
  • Anello_Catena_Navale_2.webp
    Anello_Catena_Navale_2.webp
    17.1 KB · Views: 32
  • Anello_Catena_Navale_3.webp
    Anello_Catena_Navale_3.webp
    13.2 KB · Views: 27
great work thanks to everyone for the interest.
the mesh in question must have oval size 6x4 spes 2.5 holes ø1.5 with interasse 3.5
attached a more detailed picture of a similar mesh
 

Attachments

  • maglia marina.webp
    maglia marina.webp
    24.7 KB · Views: 32
an ovoid/ellissoid and then boolean in subtraction with two pairs you balls? (one for the hole and the other for the iincavo. . .
 
great work thanks to everyone for the interest.
the mesh in question must have oval size 6x4 spes 2.5 holes ø1.5 with interasse 3.5
attached a more detailed picture of a similar mesh
:tongue: the odds do not return to me and then are mm or cm?
 
:hahahahah: eeeee vabbè instead of a catenina had talked about marine stuff I thought of a still.... I made it 60x40[mm] :36_6_3:
I got a little weird.
 

Attachments

  • Anello_Catena_navale_V1_1.webp
    Anello_Catena_navale_V1_1.webp
    44.1 KB · Views: 11
  • Anello_Catena_navale_V1_2.webp
    Anello_Catena_navale_V1_2.webp
    52.2 KB · Views: 8
  • Anello_Catena_navale_V1_3.webp
    Anello_Catena_navale_V1_3.webp
    33.4 KB · Views: 6
the lightning and adamantine power of solid modeling is nothing if it is not coaudited by the Carthusian and total control of the geometry that is guaranteed by the surface modeling.
personally they are very superficial and only superficial people do not judge from appearances (of your solids). renderings (reflects, shadows, textures, etc.) sparkle and inflate the eyes of ecstatic tears, but we want to talk about the prosaic conditions of continuity g0, g1, g2, gn with n greater than (n+1)? How do we put it?!? ? !
I say all this without raising the volume of the voice, because, in the end, the volumes are paid more taxes than on the areas (apart from the building, well...).
 
the lightning and adamantine power of solid modeling is nothing if it is not coaudited by the Carthusian and total control of the geometry that is guaranteed by the surface modeling.
personally they are very superficial and only superficial people do not judge from appearances (of your solids). renderings (reflects, shadows, textures, etc.) sparkle and inflate the eyes of ecstatic tears, but we want to talk about the prosaic conditions of continuity g0, g1, g2, gn with n greater than (n+1)? How do we put it?!? ? !
I say all this without raising the volume of the voice, because, in the end, the volumes are paid more taxes than on the areas (apart from the building, well...).
you are a great...:biggrin: I'm almost touched by the beauty of your prose that cheers my evening. in any case I doubt that to make a mesh of a necklace from 6x4 mm someone can realize if the conditions of continuity are not g(x)... there can only tell the client of the job...:tongue:
 
for now more than so in solid modeling I failed...:biggrin: maybe with a couple of extra riding curves...
 

Attachments

  • Anello_Catena_navale_V2_Analisi_Curvatura.webp
    Anello_Catena_navale_V2_Analisi_Curvatura.webp
    41.8 KB · Views: 17
This necklace is going from a red globulous gnocco... I say, those of "the human body". . .
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top