surfaces, if solidworks manages blend surfacesI do not know whether to continue on this road or to start modeling with the surfaces.
What do you recommend?
:tongue: the odds do not return to me and then are mm or cm?great work thanks to everyone for the interest.
the mesh in question must have oval size 6x4 spes 2.5 holes ø1.5 with interasse 3.5
attached a more detailed picture of a similar mesh
..I would like to see you with a "collanina" knit 6 x 4 cm ..:tongue: the odds do not return to me and then are mm or cm?
you are a great...:biggrin: I'm almost touched by the beauty of your prose that cheers my evening. in any case I doubt that to make a mesh of a necklace from 6x4 mm someone can realize if the conditions of continuity are not g(x)... there can only tell the client of the job...:tongue:the lightning and adamantine power of solid modeling is nothing if it is not coaudited by the Carthusian and total control of the geometry that is guaranteed by the surface modeling.
personally they are very superficial and only superficial people do not judge from appearances (of your solids). renderings (reflects, shadows, textures, etc.) sparkle and inflate the eyes of ecstatic tears, but we want to talk about the prosaic conditions of continuity g0, g1, g2, gn with n greater than (n+1)? How do we put it?!? ? !
I say all this without raising the volume of the voice, because, in the end, the volumes are paid more taxes than on the areas (apart from the building, well...).