solido unico departing from assieme

[MeccGo]

Good afternoon to all,

I would like to get a single solid full, starting from a set composed of various parts.
In practice, the final solid should have the external skin of the starting axieme and be completely full internally.
I tried to use the Boolean function associated but without success when it continues to give me various types of error.
suggestions? ?

Thank you very much in advance

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

https://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads...tivo-a-clienti-o-fornitori.49169/#post-390048

 

[MeccGo]

https://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads...tivo-a-clienti-o-fornitori.49169/#post-390048

thank you very much for the celerity in the answer.
I tried first to apply the method to the empty cylinder and solve the problem perfectly.
When I apply it to my case, I have a series of errors.
creating a single part of the set and applying the cavity command returns me quate error? What do you think?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

bho, I'm not a divine. how do you from a error message understand the problem? I don't say I have the file, but at least show how 'this geometry did.
will be the same problem that he had in the post I linked. . .

 

[MeccGo]

Sisi is right... I'm sorry.

 

[MeccGo]

the error is different than the reggio... .

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Surely the surfaces do not help, but above all the image of the error refers to together and to its precise function and you as repositions placed the image of a part... You realize something's not coming back?
the error is slightly different. in the case of reggio was a zero-thick geometry error that you have when there are areas with only one doi contact point like tangences, in your case it is a geometry condition error that means there is some part does not allow to join solids. in both cases it is necessary to analyze bombing and the model

 

[MeccGo]

Surely the surfaces do not help, but above all the image of the error refers to together and to its precise function and you as repositions placed the image of a part... You realize something's not coming back?
the error is slightly different. in the case of reggio was a zero-thick geometry error that you have when there are areas with only one doi contact point like tangences, in your case it is a geometry condition error that means there is some part does not allow to join solids. in both cases it is necessary to analyze bombing and the model

In fact, what I posted is a photo of the part, not of the group I'm working on, it was just to make you understand what geometry you're talking about.

 

[MeccGo]

 

[MeccGo]

This is the part file I'm working on

 

[Meteor02]

solid version and post the axieme? try to transform surfaces into solid and then merge bodies. If it gives you problems, join a body at a time until you find the body that gives problems. usually ends up in contact with a thickness 0, correct the particular that by mistake and should go.

 

[MeccGo]

solid version and post the axieme? try to transform surfaces into solid and then merge bodies. If it gives you problems, join a body at a time until you find the body that gives problems. usually ends up in contact with a thickness 0, correct the particular that by mistake and should go.

thank you for the right meteor... I try and am... . .

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

It is true that in post #4 I wrote that not having the file you can see at least the geometry, but since you have also proposed to send me the file step in private allgalo 'sto cacchio di file, we are at the #12 post we have not yet seen

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

continue to open the same request on multiple software but here we are still waiting for the file to do quche test.and maybe they would also like it in other discussions

 

[MeccGo]

continue to open the same request on multiple software but here we are still waiting for the file to do quche test.and maybe they would also like it in other discussions

I open the discussion in other software because I try to solve the problem somehow looking for other ways.... Sometimes it is not possible, not by my will, send the file. I think you or whoever works in the company can understand.
It is not a lack of trust but a necessity.
Excuse me.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I just want to know that if you wrote me privately that you could send me the step file this was shared

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

just for the precision of the chisels which they are, you never wrote that you could not post the files (we talk together and therefore have to be more than one) until today despite already being asked.

 

[czar]

file-save with name, in the options save as part (sldprt), option all bodies, then open the obtained part and boolean union of all bodies. It would remain to fill the empty spaces.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

czar, it's the first thing he did, see initial post