solids and/or extrusion surfaces

[numero1]

then mr. bentley (what a challenging name) :wink:
I downloaded your link but I haven't looked at it yet.
I agree with what you write, or a surface with all his faces is + heavy solid.
but I referred to the surface as such (1 face).
Perhaps you do not remember that we started from an example in which there were pipes and/or pipelines, now it goes by itself that a tube is empty and not full and therefore it is more real to create a surface and not a solid.
and I left from this:
1) creation of a circle, suboption hole (attention the circle must be of diameter equal to the outer one of the tube to be realized)
2) extrusion of a tot height with suboption surface
the object so obtained has dimensions defined in space, + that sufficient for your work in 3d, even if to be a true 3d, should have an extra dimension, lo spessore, to overcome this one should create a circular crown (simulating thickness) and extrude that (as solid)
or maybe create the solid full and then use the sheel command, there are many possibilities.
It's a 3d spurious, let's say so, if you interrupt the tube so made, through the information command of micro you will get as a cone answer, if I don't remember badly.
but for the purposes of your work with pipes and/or pipes it is much better to have surfaces.
I have always worked like this, I have always seen working like this, and not only, all the sw I mentioned prove to me that they work like this.
and this, I was told, just to save memory on memory, especially on plants with hundreds and/or thousands of lines.
I hope to have explained, and good weekend also to you

p.s.
Did you notice that in my bagles, all the piattabandes were missing?

 

[mr.Bentley]

allora mr. bentley (che nome impegnativo) :wink:You see you didn't attend cad3d...I downloaded your link but I haven't looked at it yet.check well :smile:I agree with what you write, or a surface with all his faces is + heavy solid.
but I referred to the surface as such (1 face).
Perhaps you do not remember that we started from an example in which there were pipes and/or pipelines, now it goes by itself that a tube is empty and not full and therefore it is more real to create a surface and not a solid.true and no, everything depends on what you have to doand I left from this:
1) creation of a circle, suboption hole (attention the circle must be of diameter equal to the outer one of the tube to be realized)
2) extrusion of a tot height with suboption surface
the object so obtained has dimensions defined in space, + that sufficient for your work in 3d, even if to be a true 3d, should have an extra dimension, lo spessore, to overcome this one should create a circular crown (simulating thickness) and extrude that (as solid)
or maybe create the solid full and then use the sheel command, there are many possibilities.or use v8iIt's a 3d spurious, let's say so, if you interrupt the tube so made, through the information command of micro you will get as a cone answer, if I don't remember badly.
but for the purposes of your work with pipes and/or pipes it is much better to have surfaces.
I have always worked like this, I have always seen working like this, and not only, all the sw I mentioned prove to me that they work like this.
and this, I was told, just to save memory on memory, especially on plants with hundreds and/or thousands of lines.
I hope to have explained, and good weekend also to you

p.s.
Did you notice that in my bagles, all the piattabandes were missing?

you can not have everything:finger:

ciao

 

[numero1]

No, no, I remember, and I attended, indeed I frequent cad3d for a long time.:finger:
I just couldn't be sure that that mr. bentley and you were the same mr. bentley, which is however (I repeat) a demanding mooolto name.
in + the fact that you only have 11 msg left me puzzled.......
I gave an okkiata to your dgn last night and left something puzzled:
when I do the constant or smooth on the surfaces of your bagles they appear as empty, on my no, while being surfaces they appear full to me.
Did you create surface through the hole suboption or what?
if it is so the effect is very brute because you see what is behind and lose that minimum depth that makes you (and much) work.
in + I saw you blew all the beam tags.
If you were in the construction site, you would have gotten yourself a horde of superinc welders and technicians.
they would not have known which bagles to put and where ..... better not have the piattabande but keep the brands (or tag).
No offense, mine want to be constructive criticism and then I would never allow myself to offend the powerful Mr. Benntley, the one from whom descends the microstation and gave spirit to the triform. :tongue:
hello and thanks for the interesting conversation

 

[mr.Bentley]

No, no, I remember, and I attended, indeed I frequent cad3d for a long time.:finger:
I just couldn't be sure that that mr. bentley and you were the same mr. bentley, which is however (I repeat) a demanding mooolto name.
in + the fact that you only have 11 msg left me puzzled.......when everything was reset, my messages like those of all other users were reset.I gave an okkiata to your dgn last night and left something puzzled:
when I do the constant or smooth on the surfaces of your bagles they appear as empty, on my no, while being surfaces they appear full to me.
Did you create surface through the hole suboption or what?
if it is so the effect is very brute because you see what is behind and lose that minimum depth that makes you (and much) work.
I only extruded as sup your complex shape, and then the sup forms on the thickness, to complete the two faces were missing, but to see what happened it was enough:smile:in + I saw you blew all the beam tags.
If you were in the construction site, you would have gotten yourself a horde of superinc welders and technicians.
they would not have known which bagles to put and where ..... better not have the piattabande but keep the brands (or tag).
Are you kidding me? it was an example to see which weighed more, and so it was right to keep only the structures to do the comparison, I repeat you are joking, right?No offense, mine want to be constructive criticism and then I would never allow myself to offend the powerful Mr. Benntley, the one from whom descends the microstation and gave spirit to the triform. :tongue:
Leave me alone or leave me a war that doesn't even dream of you... hello and thanks for the interesting conversation

soon hello and good work

 

[numero1]

when everything was reset, my messages like those of all other users were reset.just like me.... .
As for the beam tags, it was obvious that it was a joke, I had not put the smile at all, in + after I write "no offense......" :wink:
Leave me alone or leave me a war that doesn't even dream of you...War that war?
I didn't want to slap your butt if that's what you think.

Hi.

 

[mr.Bentley]

was only the famous stallion phrase in "rambo" :biggrin:

was a joke:wink:

hello to the next

.... I forgot: good work!!!

 

[numero1]

oops... :
I didn't understand, yes, I remember now, when sly points the knife to the sheriff's throat and says the famous phrase: " etc. etc. "
Hi.