solidworks 2009 save in previous versions of solid

[rosma]

hello to all , I would like to know if with solidworks 2009 you can save in previous versions type 2007 - 2008.

thank you ros

 

[sampom]

hello to all , I would like to know if with solidworks 2009 you can save in previous versions type 2007 - 2008.

thank you ros

No!
as for all cad 3d and as it has been said hundreds of times in as many previous messages (now they also know the stones). use function research and read the rules.

Then if you have the program, you should know. .

greetings
Mar

 

[marcof]

hello to all , I would like to know if with solidworks 2009 you can save in previous versions type 2007 - 2008.

thank you ros

Do you have a search in previous messages for a bilateral hernia?

But it was enough to press f1 and rtfm!

Hi.

p.s. for moderators: it takes the auto filter that to the combination of words "Save previous versions/e" automatically deletes the message

 

[sampom]

p.s. for moderators: it takes the auto filter that to the combination of words "Save previous versions/e" automatically deletes the message

Do you know how many people would like to "solite" keywords? ..the server would not hold:biggrin:

greetings
Mar

 

[Tantocattivo]

No!
as for all cad 3d and as it has been said hundreds of times in as many previous messages (now they also know the stones). use function research and read the rules.

Then if you have the program, you should know. .

greetings
Mar

in autocad you can save even in previous versions without losing almost anything. I say almost because if you use delel new functions these do not work (see springs etc).
p.s. I know that autocad is not parametric etc etc., however I wanted to make this clarification.

bye

 

[marcof]

in autocad you can save even in previous versions without losing almost anything. I say almost because if you use delel new functions these do not work (see springs etc).
p.s. I know that autocad is not parametric etc etc., however I wanted to make this clarification.
bye

vabbè, autocad e il dwg/dxf c'entra come i cavoli a merenda... I would also like to see that he could not save backwards a series of geometric entities totally untied.

 

[sampom]

in autocad you can save even in previous versions without losing almost anything.

That's what everyone knows. always.
but we were talking about cad 3d "veri" :biggrin:

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[Tantocattivo]

That's what everyone knows. always.
but we were talking about cad 3d "veri" :biggrin:

greetings
Marco:smile:

autocad is the real cad 3d and is a Mr. Cad 3d.
Autodesk was born at the end of 1982
the dassault systèmes in 1993 (11 years later)
the parametric technology corporation in 1985 (3 years later)

Okay, after starting flame escape:tongue:

ciauz

 

[Tequila]

autocad is the real cad 3d and is a Mr. Cad 3d.
Autodesk was born at the end of 1982
the dassault systèmes in 1993 (11 years later)
the parametric technology corporation in 1985 (3 years later)

Okay, after starting flame escape:tongue:

ciauz

Look, even if she was born before doesn't mean she's the best. of 2d programs there are several. as told by colleagues here we talk about 3d mathematicians and not trivial geometries 2d untied among them. if it were as you say then inventor who is a 3d cad and always autodesk product should allow the rescue of 3d models in the previous versions. Does that prove to you?
Hi.

 

[Mike1967]

autocad is the real cad 3d and is a Mr. Cad 3d.
Autodesk was born at the end of 1982
the dassault systèmes in 1993 (11 years later)
the parametric technology corporation in 1985 (3 years later)

Okay, after starting flame escape:tongue:

ciauz

autocad... is it a cad????? :biggrin: for the love of God...:biggrin:

 

[marcof]

autocad is the real cad 3d and is a Mr. Cad 3d.

rotfl! better than a joke; Do you know anything else like that? :biggrin:

Autodesk was born at the end of 1982
the dassault systèmes in 1993 (11 years later)
the parametric technology corporation in 1985 (3 years later)

you and just dassault and ptc tested their first beta3 they found 100 years ahead autodesk all in a bang.
I read enthusiastic comments (I would say to the limit of orgasm) of autocad users to have in 2010, finally, the constraints to the same entities caught by snaps; after a first motto of tenderness ("poor people disobey to understand them, they are finally beginning to see the light") I have passed to the most total ilarity. how to read four wheels and find a review on the use of tyres instead of the least comfortable wooden wheels... :tongue:
In short, self-desk to its customers have been years of age reading and occasionally hangs a lot to make him forget the pain and be able to convince them to use a real and especially modern cad3d.

Okay, after starting flame escape:tongue:

There's no problem, with your flames, I brought the steam crusher's boiler to the temperature. :smile:

 

[maxopus]

autocad is the real cad 3d and is a Mr. Cad 3d.
Autodesk was born at the end of 1982
the dassault systèmes in 1993 (11 years later)
the parametric technology corporation in 1985 (3 years later)

Okay, after starting flame escape:tongue:

ciauz

make the plumbing schemes (the one you can do with autocad) or the seedlings and prospectuses for the houses.
for the mechanics it is better if you let it lose ... I have seen of the bowls but, worse than autodesk there is only think design. :biggrin:

 

[Tequila]

make the plumbing schemes (the one you can do with autocad) or the seedlings and prospectuses for the houses.
for the mechanics it is better if you let it lose ... I have seen of the bowls but, worse than autodesk there is only think design. :biggrin:

years ago before moving on to solid edge for reasons related to files made with an old cad 2d (a certain pj2) in the office I used bluecad 2.0, it worked rough as autocad and the cost was 100 euros or little more. If I have to spend 1000 euros or more for a version of autocad, surely and to closed eyes I would buy a 3d as for example alibre where besides saving money I have a 3d parametric cad.

 

[MBT]

make the plumbing schemes (the one you can do with autocad) or the seedlings and prospectuses for the houses.
for the mechanics it is better if you let it lose ... I have seen of the bowls but, worse than autodesk there is only think design. :biggrin:

mha, personally autocad seems to me a discreet 2d
absolutely a bad 3d
on thinkdesign.... deserve academic kiss!

 

[maxopus]

mha, personally autocad seems to me a discreet 2d
absolutely a bad 3d
on thinkdesign.... deserve academic kiss!

That's why I talked about patterns... because the 2d can stay.
but let the 3d and the mechanics stay.

I am convinced that if a software house like dassault or ptc were to develop a bim on their kernel would be infinite pains for the autodesk.
they had a tragic past with mechanical desktop, with inventor they went almost worse, so that there was a ongoing negotiation to use the ptc kernel (see that their is a bowl).

we will see how the story ends... it is not enough to have made the money on autocad 2d to assert that all they do is good.

 

[Oldwarper]

eye to flame.. .
I've got my finger on the lock. "

 

[MBT]

Well, come on.
they felt worse in the "cad comparisons".

However, fanatics aside and speaking objectively, autocad is the most widespread, but not necessarily the best of the 2d

 

[Tequila]

Well, come on.
they felt worse in the "cad comparisons".

However, fanatics aside and speaking objectively, autocad is the most widespread, but not necessarily the best of the 2d

more than anything else has had the merit of creating the dwg format which is one of the most used for data exchange 2d between different cad.

 

[marcof]

That's why I talked about patterns... because the 2d can stay.
but let the 3d and the mechanics stay.

I am convinced that if a software house like dassault or ptc were to develop a bim on their kernel would be infinite pains for the autodesk.

to read the forum of revit it would be said that in the architectural field it urgently serves someone who knows what a plm or at least a parametric cad.
to pull up four walls and make two ladders out of standard seems to be crazy.

they had a tragic past with mechanical desktop, with inventor they went almost worse, so that there was a ongoing negotiation to use the ptc kernel (see that their is a bowl).

I didn't know that, but I knew that they changed or rewrite a tot in progress.

 

[maxopus]

to read the forum of revit it would be said that in the architectural field it urgently serves someone who knows what a plm or at least a parametric cad.
to pull up four walls and make two ladders out of standard seems to be crazy.



I didn't know that, but I knew that they changed or rewrite a tot in progress.

lisp lisp lisp lisp lisp lisp lisp lisp lisp lisp Who has a family of oblique walls? Who's got a tilted wall, who's got a leg cut?