solidworks 2011: richiesta informazioni

[Mike1967]

a question.
an ultradefined design is a basic design not correct?
because I often put extra quotas that for me are useful but sw indicates me as odds that ultradefine the design.
But I don't know if I can leave them or they could give me trouble.

you have two possibilities:
1- hand set the status of "guided", on the share that you do not care
more.

2-Setting that by default the prg imposed as "guided" the share that overlooks the sketch. (see attached Immages)

About welding, did you investigate the speech?

Hi.



p.
@ king, sorry, I was upping the image and I didn't realize your answer. :smile:

 

[p@po]

you have two possibilities:
1- hand set the status of "guided", on the share that you do not care
more.

2-Setting that by default the prg imposed as "guided" the share that overlooks the sketch. (see attached Immages)

About welding, did you investigate the speech?

Hi.



p.
@ king, sorry, I was upping the image and I didn't realize your answer. :smile:

Thank you very much.
Yes, for welds I am deciding to model the pieces in this mode.
I must be honest:
for now I realize that it allows to have already ready features (such as handkerchiefs) but the logic at the end seems to me to create, solid sketch, other sketch close > solid, thus forming a multibody system.
but apart from this I still miss its versatility.
cmq just finish making a piece place the model so tell me if I did something conceptually wrong or not.:finger:

 

[p@po]

already that there are a question on the holes:
in the image below I had to place holes in succession and equidistant among them.
Now,
in sketchup I was accustomed to using a function in which, defined the position of the first hole (or object) and defined the position of the last, the intermediate ones placed them equidistant in an automatic way.
Is there something like that in solidwork or do I have to make calculations from me? ?

 

[Mike1967]

already that there are a question on the holes:
in the image below I had to place holes in succession and equidistant among them.
Now,
in sketchup I was accustomed to using a function in which, defined the position of the first hole (or object) and defined the position of the last, the intermediate ones placed them equidistant in an automatic way.
Is there something like that in solidwork or do I have to make calculations from me? ?

just put the quota at the beginning and end of the repetition of the sketch.

 

[aldus]

I was at the presentation looks like a quick bag to use the 2011 version.
What do you say?
I would like to pass to 2011 but as I use a management they told me that it is better to wait a bit, because dbcent is thought for 2010 and could give some trouble.
Does anyone know dbcent and use it on 2011 and know how to give me some advice?

 

[Mike1967]

I was at the presentation looks like a fast to use version 2011.
What do you say?
I would like to pass to 2011 but as I use a management they told me that it is better to wait a bit, because dbcent is thought for 2010 and could give some trouble.
Does anyone know dbcent and use it on 2011 and know how to give me some advice?

depends on which version, if you tell me about '98, 2001, 2001+, 2003, 2003+,2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009 (this is what I used...) ok is faster, but compared to 2010... it is not that much known.
to the presentations show proven objects billions of times drawn to the bone
at the level of functions and all row smooth... like all presentations and exhibitions
are scripts designed for those events.

 

[lelepanz]

I was at the presentation looks like a quick bag to use the 2011 version.
What do you say?
I would like to pass to 2011 but as I use a management they told me that it is better to wait a bit, because dbcent is thought for 2010 and could give some trouble.
Does anyone know dbcent and use it on 2011 and know how to give me some advice?

I confirm that between 2010 and 2011 there is no difference in speed.
There is some "smallness" that makes you exclaim... sti cazzi. !

 

[p@po]

long ago I asked how to collect on a sloped plane an extrusion that departed from a plane arranged differently.
now that you have taught me how to make I noticed that cmq in the drawing creates a sort of fitting (top) of the building on the floor.
Is it a normal way of solving the problem or is there a more "clean" way?

 

[Mike1967]

long ago I asked how to collect on a sloped plane an extrusion that departed from a plane arranged differently.
now that you have taught me how to make I noticed that cmq in the drawing creates a sort of fitting (top) of the building on the floor.
Is it a normal way of solving the problem or is there a more "clean" way?

you have not enabled the function "join result"....:tongue:

 

[p@po]

you have not enabled the function "join result"....:tongue:

Blue...
Is there a way to recover the uniqueness without remaking everything from head?
I tried to erase the extrusion to remake it but ahimè erases me a piece to it attached.

other thing:
provided that I solved with the mode "bed" of the "savings"
But why do I do it classically? ?http://www.megaupload.com/?d=lp1p70hs

 

[Mike1967]

Blue...
Is there a way to recover the uniqueness without remaking everything from head?
I tried to erase the extrusion to remake it but ahimè erases me a piece to it attached.

Yes, right-click on extrusion, modify and enable the above function.

other thing:
provided that I solved with the mode "bed" of the "savings"
But why do I do it classically? ?http://www.megaupload.com/?d=lp1p70hs

you tend to make an extrusion to the surface, but the surface must be
in the direction of the extrusion arrow... Not by the side.
read the guide, the theme (extrusions) is treated well.
in welding functions is contemplated as specially studied
for that environment, this is a point in favor.

Hi.

 

[p@po]

Yes, right-click on extrusion, modify and enable the above function.

great:finger:

you tend to make an extrusion to the surface, but the surface must be
in the direction of the extrusion arrow... Not by the side.
read the guide, the theme (extrusions) is treated well.
in welding functions is contemplated as specially studied
for that environment, this is a point in favor.
Hi.

mmm,
by direction of the arrow you mean that you don't have to have a side of adiacence as in my right case? ?
How do you mean that online? ?

question:
I was "meditating" on the difference between a 2d sketch and a 3d.
for that geese I understand, a 2d sketch cannot "develop" in space if not through functions (extrusion etc etc etc.9 while the 3d sketch can be developed in space even with simple entities like other lines etc. etc.
Do I understand correctly? (at least part)?

thanks mike for your help :wink:

 

[Mike1967]

great:finger:



mmm,
by direction of the arrow you mean that you don't have to have a side of adiacence as in my right case? ?
How do you mean that online? ?

question:
I was "meditating" on the difference between a 2d sketch and a 3d.
for that geese I understand, a 2d sketch cannot "develop" in space if not through functions (extrusion etc etc etc.9 while the 3d sketch can be developed in space even with simple entities like other lines etc. etc.
Do I understand correctly? (at least part)?

thanks mike for your help :wink:

I'm sorry, but when you move the extrusion, do you not see the side where it is created?
the help is this:http://help.solidworks.com/2011/ita...ror_messages_help/c_boss_and_cut_extrudes.htmfor the sketch, the term 3d identifies with wonder the purpose of the sketch.http://help.solidworks.com/2011/ita...dworks/sw_sketch/using_3d_sketching_tools.htm

 

[aldus]

I confirm that between 2010 and 2011 there is no difference in speed.
There is some "smallness" that makes you exclaim... sti cazzi. !

Well, actually, I didn't specify... I work with 20010 and I wondered if it would be better to move to 2011.

I had some problems and I had to format all the pc... now reinstalling everything I can not complain and solidworks works pretty well, better than before. then switching to 2011 risking having problems I'm upset a bit you know my boss would like to start seeing results and that problems disappeared not new inconveniences. . .
It's just a little prejudice to the programme. .

instead to do the manuals and catalogs you think of the application program that provides solidworks?

 

[aldus]

I forgot thanks mike for the answer.. .

 

[lelepanz]

Well, actually, I didn't specify... I work with 20010 and I wondered if it would be better to move to 2011.

I had some problems and I had to format all the pc... now reinstalling everything I can not complain and solidworks works pretty well, better than before. then switching to 2011 risking having problems I'm upset a bit you know my boss would like to start seeing results and that problems disappeared not new inconveniences. . .
It's just a little prejudice to the programme. .
instead to do the manuals and catalogs you think of the application program that provides solidworks?

What? 3dvia composed?

 

[aldus]

What? 3dvia composed?

Yes, I had seen some presentations but I don't know if it's really worth it.
Do you know him and use him?
Can someone give me some advice?

 

[lelepanz]

Yes, I had seen some presentations but I don't know if it's really worth it.
Do you know him and use him?
Can someone give me some advice?

It's good.
It's easy to use. I messed with it, but I didn't go to the bottom because it's not exactly my job. It's expensive.
It's about 6000 €, at least so last year I don't know if they've "registered" it now.
we didn't get it at the end. you can download the 30-day demo, renewable.
just in the end require a new license from the dassault website.

 

[p@po]

excuse the question but I have some perplexity on the scale function.
Suppose we have a nut, the same nut, the same shape but that in the design has different diameters, only that.
with the scale function I redefine the size but the quotation remains the original one?
What's the point?
in this case it forces me to enter every schzzo and change the odds with the result that often resize all functions is a mess.

 

[re_solidworks]

the purpose of the scale command is another, for example to scale a model to consider the retreats of a mold.
in any case if you step a dice you will not get the correct measures. If you need to model bolt elements from you, you should use data tables. if your models mess up at the change of odds means that your modeling is not performed well.