• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

solidworks for hire, "and i pay..." [cit.]

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcof
  • Start date Start date
New Rider said:
to me have reported that buying a license is given free an accessory license type simulation,composer,mdb or other... .
Click to expand...
I don't have time to lose even if I'd like to make them lose so much, but I'm afraid that by deepening the issue they'll jump out of the type you need to ensure three years of assistance (full price list) on all three early payment software.
They have a hair on the stomach that takes the reaper to get wide.
if someone wants to organize a planetary campaign to sow their weeds and make them collapse the sales of annual aids I am available; not here, however, that otherwise the forum shut us down or could happen a "accident" to the server :smile:
 
I would like to ask the Commission to take the necessary steps to ensure that we are able to do so.
we pay, we update both software that I know and eventually lost time also work. Today I have another beautiful thing that I have never seen before and that I sincerely do not understand, but that however after the last updates of win10 (.... vabbè da Let's pretend nothing!).
I'm doing a circular repetition of those 3 elements you see2.webp3.webpI confirm the function and voilà that appears? !1.webpI ask that I may always have wronged something, but I think that being the elementary function I don't think so, so tell me what might have happened?! I do not know if you happen to yourself strange things of this kind, but this is the fruit of this software house policy, of all indistinctly I believe. It is necessary to interrupt this process that leads us to exhaust ourselves!
I look forward to your considerations about it, because hearing the assistance and making me say that it is probably an installation problem or that with the new version everything works, sincerely. . .
 
what you see is that there is a shortage of backgrounds but only in a position. is he absent?
You can only train that snot
 
I never understood but he did so to me I didn't even jump out with the assistance. I have reinstalled win 10e I have blocked updates now it works all :( . do trust the firewall and hope in god... by the way with win 10 pro without updates sw16 now I go to cannon
 
Meteor02 said:
I never understood but he did so to me I didn't even jump out with the assistance. I have reinstalled win 10e I have blocked updates now it works all :( . do trust the firewall and hope in god... by the way with win 10 pro without updates sw16 now I go to cannon
Click to expand...
I am convinced that they are updates, in fact it makes me weird all after the latest updates. . So this is unacceptable. I think it's time to make a ws without internet connection until they allow it.
 
of two files that you have attached I noticed that in that working the axis is drawn in the axieme while in the other it is drawn in the part. for scruple try to draw it in the axieme also in the kissed one.
I did the repetition function again, and I don't know how to tell you... I don't think there's a painless way... I mean, it's gonna hurt you. repeated the components correctly; I also only changed the function by eliminating the kicked wallpapers, closed the function then re-edited by adding the wallpapers and ... I don't know how to tell you... I don't think there's a painless way... I mean, it's gonna hurt you. .........
 
MassiVonWeizen said:
of two files that you have attached I noticed that in that working the axis is drawn in the axieme while in the other it is drawn in the part. for scruple try to draw it in the axieme also in the kissed one.
I did the repetition function again, and I don't know how to tell you... I don't think there's a painless way... I mean, it's gonna hurt you. repeated the components correctly; I also only changed the function by eliminating the kicked wallpapers, closed the function then re-edited by adding the wallpapers and ... I don't know how to tell you... I don't think there's a painless way... I mean, it's gonna hurt you. .........
Click to expand...
Then I did the test, too. first I did sketch together and edited the series, e-mail result was the same. then I deleted the old series and I remade it et voilà came all correctly!
At this point I think I understand, but I don't know how to tell myself that maybe.. .
And then to you, I think I understand your thoughts perfectly... Unfortunately!
And then I don't know exactly how to tell you.... thank you!
 
I think I understand your thinking perfectly... Unfortunately!
Click to expand...
I'm afraid you misunderstood me now that I read how much I wrote. in fact the It'll hurt you. could be interpreted as a technology anal(I don't think, at least hope, that I have to explain the game of words)
I did not mean this even if it fits in brush(s); was more than a parody of those phrases of circumstance that you use when you have to communicate a bad news like to give up the girl, tell her that the cat died when you closed the garage swinger, warn her that you forgot to pay her insurance, remind her that the letter that arrived in the morning is the court that confiscates her car because without insurance and that she must find a lawyer for that insurance issue. . I mean, you don't know how to tell him, that yes, he's gonna hurt at first, but then he's gonna do a reason, and I mean, you've decided that maybe you don't deserve it, and it's better if you go your way! That's what I meant.
 
do you know if only support techniques can be provided? i.e. without program update? I prefer to ask you first that the representative will try to twist me.
Thank you.
 
I reopen this "old" discussion... I hope someone can help me. . .

I have always used inventor but now my main client could start asking me, at least temporarily, only solidworks jobs.

is there a way to have a working demo (I would just want to try to cuff us a little bit to understand the differences with inventor) without going through for the sellers?

I would like, at least initially, to avoid recontacting agents to make me make purchase/nolege quotes... but does anyone know about the costs (at least the version with mechanical libraries) of purchase/nolege? I read about 199€/month but it seems to me to be a simple lease but I did not understand the duration...

Does anyone have any idea whether the rental is only annual or can, as for other software house, rent monthly without constraints?

but by purchasing / renting, can you use the previous versions, to maintain compatibility with customers?
 
there is the possibility to use sw for a month in demo mode. when expiry does not allow you to open it more unless you activate it by entering license codes. without passing from the seller I do not know if it is possible to download it directly registering in the site solidworks.it. for the costs of a hypothetical rental I never cared for. while x last your question I tell you that entering the site you have the possibility to download even previous versions, but I do not know if it is the same thing not being a customer. you must try and register on the site. another possibility is that someone will provide you with the installation files. as the last possibility there would be the strange...that in the end is not entirely "ill.."... because you install it in demo mode... we understood...oops I have reasoned loudly, I apologize x the trouble!
 
I don't even think about it... Also letting on what I spend in software every year, I have a certain repulsion for "thefts". . .
Unfortunately in the solidworks site there is a possibility to register for a demo copy, but not as simple download... to have it you have to pass through the sellers... that then stick as mussels with their offers "unrepeatable!!!!".
All right, I'll be brave and I'll deal with them. . .
 
I want to emphasize, maybe before I didn't, that I'm not x the dark side, but it gives you the chance to have the software that you then install in demo mode, without many stories with the dealers.. .
 
marcof said:
I received this "off" from my former swx dealer who, as far as I am concerned, becomes more and more ex.
Ladies and gentlemen, we're not here to sell but to give! the more people enter and the more beasts they see!"buy solidworks from 199 euro per month without additional costs for financial burdenstake advantage of this offer valid until funds are exhausted. You can access to the potentialities of solidworks starting from 199 euro per month!"
"..... the maintenance and service fee 'subscription service' must be purchased for 12 months at full price. "
"Offer subject to other limitations"
the tram of rental licenses has departed and those who salt can no longer descend. have finally found the system to crack well, and on a continuous cycle, their customers who become in fact milk cows in battery. I like to remember during the mugitura every now and then some mansueta cow, with a well-established kick, spreads the brain to the evil milker who pulls too much.
swx users prepared vasellina, than that in the maintenance contract is not included
Click to expand...
the mail that you had received was due to a European or Italian fund for the computerization of the azienede, in fact the maintenance fee you pay for whole, in fact it is a service, the software if you do not pay for whole who did the financing you lag it if we would like to say so, it was not a formula to rent autodesk style or adobe to quote 2, in the case of the mail you could pay it in rate 60
 
drake said:
The software houses are amazing to have customers who only enjoy x who have their updated software. Moreover, we see it in all sectors of the "new technologies", in the first place the phones that are increasingly intelligent in spite of their owners! returning to the cad, I do not understand how you can think that the new versions are more performing than the old, but I on my skin found that today with supermachines I do the same things that until recently I did with antiduliviane versions of my sw with machines that had 1/10 of the "power" of this ultratime. I still remember the presentation of my new version, 2016, which was advertised by saying that many fewer clicks were made... in a while they will tell us that just think about the project and the cad will realize it better than what we thought. I think it's time to see who's playing their game behind us and try not to move x do not, in fact, the opponent's game... :
Click to expand...
work in a company where nx has been used for a long time.
I started using it from version 7.5, from scratch.
in 1 year of non-intensive use however, I have come to know more functions and best practices than people who use it since 1996.
not because I am a phenomenon. at all.
I have often heard myself say what you say here and in my company reality I understood and I realized why.
First of all there is a fault contest: on the one hand the company does not promote frequent courses but above all, those few that are made are of low level, generic and little focused on certain topics.
On the other hand the majority of my colleagues hardly with spontaneous curiosity deepen the modeling techniques exploiting the advantage of the enhancement that the sw over time earns (and that the company paid and paid fragrantly for the software granting policies ).
so I think it is necessary caution when it states 'how to say that a software and more performing than a previous version': in these cases there would be a question:, but how well and efficiently do I use/know?
Of course, they have built the pyramids without the means available today, but to say that between now and 3000 years ago of differences and improvements there is no to have been I seem a little reductive especially when (and I make a trivial example but I think clear) there are people who answer me that make a hole with a feature hole and then apply the feature symbolic thread or use the same feature with activated the threaded hole function where in one click you get better.
so before speaking we should consider how much we are trained and informed (and this reasoning applies to me on every aspect, both working and not).

We will arrive (and the first steps are being taken) to have software capable of developing models almost independently, starting from data and conditions charged by the user (generative design) and probably going beyond.

I, yes, enjoy when I have a new version of a sw that I use (it is an os or other) because I'm hungry to know the news, also hoping that these improve my daily work making it pleasant.
And if I can't find them alone, I'll find them.
sincerely until now, for me, it was so and I continue to discover 'figaggini'.[emoji57]for the policies of sale of the sw instead, well... they are puzzled.
but what to say... and what to do.. .


sent by my col-l29 using tapatalk
 
to me the rent can please provided on a monthly and not annual basis. if made on a monthly basis it has its reason of being in the answer to the request of the client on individual orders, while on an annual basis the required time horizon is too long to be able to program it throughout the period of rent.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)
Back
Top