• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

solidworks: surface cut

  • Thread starter Thread starter PICO
  • Start date Start date
I appreciate your enthusiasm, but as I told you, even the vendors of its software have surrendered, there are various aspects that prevent you from gaining time... .
the speech is articulated.
You should come visit me in the company to realize it.... :
if I pass there willingly, thank you!:smile:
It's true, the speech is articulate, and it should be thorough to see your particular case well. as soon as I get back from the holidays if you want to talk more specifically.

Bye.
 
I appreciate your enthusiasm, but as I told you, even the vendors of its software have surrendered, there are various aspects that prevent you from gaining time... .
the speech is articulated.
You should come visit me in the company to realize it.... :
sellers are often not technicians and often do not even know their product.
I wouldn't mind getting into this.
 
I see her black... .
with all the modesty of the case I think I'm not a newbie of solidworks and real technicians I've met many. There are cases where the good old autocad becomes unbeatable. non-parameterity and its banality of use become winning weapons in comparison to the colossal and fabulous 3d (indispensable in a thousand other cases).

I think it's like the car. the super suv is unbeatable on the highway and in a thousand cases, but when you have to enter the historical center of a medieval village the panda goes on while the suv does not pass... .
It would take us both to be in place in every situation.
make-up is in making the most of the peculiarities of each.

I have the impression that many (of those I talked to), want at all costs to prove that with 3d you get everywhere. Certainly it is true, but we must see in what times.
It's always like the first suv. At the end maybe it comes, but it has to make long turns to avoid narrow lanes, while the pandino would pass straight as a fuse....

However, I am very open to any improvement proposal.
That's why I opened the discussion to compare myself to other visuals.
Thank you all.
 
I see her black... .
with all the modesty of the case I think I'm not a newbie of solidworks and real technicians I've met many. There are cases where the good old autocad becomes unbeatable. non-parameterity and its banality of use become winning weapons in comparison to the colossal and fabulous 3d (indispensable in a thousand other cases).

I think it's like the car. the super suv is unbeatable on the highway and in a thousand cases, but when you have to enter the historical center of a medieval village the panda goes on while the suv does not pass... .
It would take us both to be in place in every situation.
make-up is in making the most of the peculiarities of each.

I have the impression that many (of those I talked to), want at all costs to prove that with 3d you get everywhere. Certainly it is true, but we must see in what times.
It's always like the first suv. At the end maybe it comes, but it has to make long turns to avoid narrow lanes, while the pandino would pass straight as a fuse....

However, I am very open to any improvement proposal.
That's why I opened the discussion to compare myself to other visuals.
Thank you all.
Maybe it would take you a parametric cad, or contextual :-)
 
Like what?
You mean progeny?
No... I mean I create, which has both parametric and contextual functions.
so much to understand, the changes you make by moving the geometric entities without having a tree of history.
 
I don't know him.
I need to know. .
start visiting the ptc site to get an idea.
in practice the old pro/e has become creo parametric.
then there is creo direct, the explicit modeler.
create parametric also has many of the functions of the explicit modeler.
I've seen that you're Marches, where exactly? I live in Mondain and I am 20 minutes by weight and 15 minutes by urbino.
If you want to talk, I'm here.
 
thanks to the availability.
I'm close to ancon.
I'd like to have a chat.
pro/e I had evaluated it in the distant year 2000, then I had chosen sw for issues of cost and practicality.
Surely since then it will have changed a lot.
 
already...
I don't remember your nick, I think I'll see you soon, so I'll show you a couple of things about the development applied to alucobond materials.
Matteo is following you for a cam check, right?
 
Bye!
Great.

Actually with matteo we are on stand by (at least for the moment).
to say it all we arrived to alma just before he proposed it to us and we are in the evaluation phase.

It's gonna be all right after the holidays.

for speech 3d we are already in contact with solidworks, revit and progeny.... we will see. .
 
Bye!
Great.

Actually with matteo we are on stand by (at least for the moment).
to say it all we arrived to alma just before he proposed it to us and we are in the evaluation phase.

It's gonna be all right after the holidays.

for speech 3d we are already in contact with solidworks, revit and progeny.... we will see. .
Okay, I'd look at you too, just to have a full view of the situation.
I do not know if progeny and revit do to your case, because on the developments of alucobond materials I do not find they have a solution.
When the time comes, I will jump, so we will see if there are more efficient solutions for your application.
Take care.
 
keep burning video:
http://www.progenio. it/news/it/49/27-07-2012/folding-progenio-per-finiture-d’autore.aspxLooks like he does.

But consider that for me the development of the piece is secondary.
I care about speed and versatility of work.
I already have those who look after them. Among other things, every time there are a thousand variations that force you to make a sample on the most complex pieces and you cannot automate too much.
I would also severe my part of work of a greater detail of the pieces, which now flows well.

However, as we said, we will talk about it in detail.

the availability!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top