special design n°1

[Fabietto]

Now a question arises spontaneously, is it necessary that I make the view from above? in the previous design for example, I could have quoted in the view in plant and the one from the right and end there?

first, the view you refer to (grassetto) is not the plant, but it is front view.
Then I'll ask you the question. .
you, with the only front and side view, would be able to put all odds and above all,
would you be able to understand (you) how the particular is done?

 

[Fabietto]

in all the drawings that I am doing there are only the views in 2d, there is never the piece in 3d close, otherwise I would have solved many problems already. I should imagine seeing the view, but that's where I have the greatest difficulties

Here you affirm that your main problem is to imagine the 3d form of what is represented in the orthogonal projections.
after giving you my advice, (sometimes quoted by boulders), continue on your way...

 

[luca234]

first, the view you refer to (grassetto) is not the plant, but it is front view.
Then I'll ask you the question. .
you, with the only front and side view, would be able to put all odds and above all,
would you be able to understand (you) how the particular is done?

I got confused, front view. I can't understand how the detail is made from two views, then how can I ask myself to draw another view if you don't know how it is done? for the advice he gave me, that's what I've been doing this morning.

 

[Fabietto]

Not last. .
continue to post from different users. .
you are incorrigible (to use a politically correct term). .

 

[Fabietto]

I got confused, front view. I can't understand how the detail is made from two views, then how can I ask myself to draw another view if you don't know how it is done? for the advice he gave me, that's what I've been doing this morning.

last and after I drop the bone..
try to post what you've been doing since this morning (isometric view)

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

in these drawings are there and I have seen. Unfortunately, there will be no examination. I meant that. Now a question arises spontaneously, is it necessary that I make the view from above? in the previous design for example, could I quote in the view in the plant and the one from the right and end there?

What won't be there? you're crying the dead because you can't understand how the details are made or imagine them three-dimensionally, you say that with 3d views it would be easier to understand and that the exercises you do do not have the solution to compare your work with; then you give yourself exercises that have both the acenometry and the solutions but instead of using them continue to make those of a book that has drawings made with false views, are interpretable and has no rescontri.fai as you like.

and izia always use the same alias, which you can see that sometimes you are connected with both and then alternatively a few minutes away now with one hour with the other. What does it cost you to do the same access with both devices?

 

[luca234]

What won't be there? you're crying the dead because you can't understand how the details are made or imagine them three-dimensionally, you say that with 3d views it would be easier to understand and that the exercises you do do not have the solution to compare your work with; then you give yourself exercises that have both the acenometry and the solutions but instead of using them continue to make those of a book that has drawings made with false views, are interpretable and has no rescontri.fai as you like.

I misunderstood myself, or so the drawings that are in the book are interpretable? So I can't know how the object is made three-dimensionally? more precisely what is meant by "fake views"?

 

[luca234]

I'll get back to my last question. This was the exam simulation proposed by the professor, which among other things we discussed here on the forum and which I was banging because I couldn't understand how the piece was done from above. this is the design of the particular proposed by the professor, which is practically a copy of what is in the delivery, without adding any other view to interpret. Why didn't he make the view from above? So I wonder, I'm banging to solve a problem that doesn't need or is not solved?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I misunderstood myself, or so the drawings that are in the book are interpretable?

just see the drawing you posted special extraction from total

So I can't know how the object is made three-dimensionally?

Of course you can, but you must be able

more precisely what is meant by "fake views"?

false views are seen that for time and space needs are not projections or didactic sections, but with plan change or forcings represent the functionality and purpose of the components; are seen that they were used at the time of the tecnigraph and sometimes in cad 2d and were used almost exclusively in total

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Why didn't he make the view from above? So I wonder, I'm banging to solve a problem that doesn't need or is not solved?

apart from you being a student and you have to learn how to make drawings and you can't do it, so even if the third view is not required you have to do it because otherwise in a year you are still here to propose wrong designs.
but above all why ask us something that can only tell you your teacher?

 

[ragnol]

but above all why ask us something that can only tell you your teacher?

because the teacher knows only gorea (@andream12 ).

if you ask questions a certain luca (@ luca234 ) who has never seen in his life slams him out of office '

 

[Fabietto]

this is the design of the particular proposed by the professor, which is practically a copy of what is in the delivery, without adding any other view to interpret. Why didn't he make the view from above? .

because, with the addition of the b-b section, and the quotation of the ø of the entities, it does not leave room for interpretation, and therefore the view in the plant is not necessary. .

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

hi, if you need help I offer 2d designs and 3d models at good price here: https://www.fiverr.com/s/x52kg1

this is the section with student requests; You're actually offering a student to pay his job. I would say that it is wrong for a multitude of reasons that seem trivial to list.
before offering your services perhaps it would be the case of asking a question to whom you are offering it.

 

[meccanicamg]

this is the section with student requests; You're actually offering a student to pay his job. I would say that it is wrong for a multitude of reasons that seem trivial to list.
before offering your services perhaps it would be the case of asking a question to whom you are offering it.

And then they'll be owned by who?
And then, uh, mechanical napkin will be really good?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

with your help doesn't seem to be doing very well... Perhaps you should buy them well

we try to route the student to do the task alone and then learn the concept at the base of the exercise. you teach that with money you can wash your hands. I prefer that a poorly prepared student repeated the year rather than a danaroso student can design another morandian bridge