spiovente roof – slope falda

[mario cant]

Hello, everyone.
I created a cover with two winds on the long side for the building shown in figure 1.
as you can see from the same fig. 1 the part highlighted in red is fractionated (divided) in the two parts a and b, while it should be a whole .... it should also create a single espousing surface with the parts c. i.e. a, b, and c should be a unique and unfractioned spiovent.
to create the highlighted part in fig. 1 I used three “tilting arrows” as seen in the fig. 3. in such parts if I take off the “tilting arrows” and use “defines inclination” I get the result of fig. 4, that is not a single spiovent but always fractionated but this time in three parts, a central and two side.

I don’t understand what it depends on, I tried them all....I have changed the angles of the inclination several times but nothing the result is the same.
Can someone tell me if I'm wrong or how can I get through the problem?
Thank you in advance

 

[Tristan]

have you tried with the "define tilt" only on one of the sides of the roof (and not on all) or with one arrow?

 

[mario cant]

have you tried with the "define tilt" only on one of the sides of the roof (and not on all) or with one arrow?

after your suggestion I tried as follows:
1- with only one arrow (the biggest one in Fig.3) and gave me notice of error > impossible to join the roof.
2 – I have erased all the arrows and left only the "definite inclination" on the first part of the left......Everything went well, he created me as spiovent as I wanted to.

only now I have another doubt, fig. 5 .....considerate the part of the roof d and let's say that you want it to be a kind of non-classical “bain” at triangle (like the one on the left) but straight. at equal protrusion y ie without changing the length of the stretch y, how can you adjust the height of the eaves line in the stretch x (fig. 5)?????

 

[mario cant]

I forgot....in the hypothesis before, you will have to change ( raising or lowering) only the x section, for obvious needs of the presence of the underlying door-
while the height of the remaining line of slings must remain unified

 

[gfrank]

if you intend to change the quota of the x line, without changing the length y, it means that in that stretch varies the slope.
In this case you must:
- interrupt the layer (existing roof perimeter) at the beginning of the y stretch for the whole length x;
- make a new ground (a new roof) with relative slope (surface in plant size x and y) that connects with the existing roof. on such (new) roof will apply the relative slope arrow, or the initial (colm) and final (gronda) share

 

[mario cant]

yes ...ok it is necessary to operate for variation of the slope of the roof part with x-y sides.
However, the fact remains that two separate roofs must be created - the largest existing roof and a new one of x-y sides.
Good