tantanco45
Guest
dear all,
Would you help me spy on the part?
Thank you :wink:
Would you help me spy on the part?
Thank you :wink:
tantanco45
Guest
I forgot the annex.. .
innocente
Guest
Hello, Tan45... Maybe, even put the pro-e version you use, I have the wf3 but I can't open the file!
tantanco45
Guest
Andrea - Overcam
Guest
Hi.
I have no pro-e, but since the problem concerns me for exercise I opened the file with the spaceclaim, I created the average surface of the 4 sides, and then subdivided each side (via the spaceclaim plugin smo+) in a series of planary triangles that approximate the surface, so I developed (always through plugin) the surface with the triangles... I don't know pro-e, but maybe you can follow a similar procedure and then work with medium surfaces.
If you need only the developments you find in the annex.
I have no pro-e, but since the problem concerns me for exercise I opened the file with the spaceclaim, I created the average surface of the 4 sides, and then subdivided each side (via the spaceclaim plugin smo+) in a series of planary triangles that approximate the surface, so I developed (always through plugin) the surface with the triangles... I don't know pro-e, but maybe you can follow a similar procedure and then work with medium surfaces.
If you need only the developments you find in the annex.
tantanco45
Guest
Thank you.
only I would need to understand how to spy on the sheet in question using pro/e wf4 commands. I understand that this is a double-curve surface, so it is not physically possible to smooth it without making any tears of the surface itself. things change if you think of areas that deform or contract in the double curvature zones...so drawing approximately a flat surface. pro/e surely contemplate these functions... but I can do it: eek:
thank you again and thank you to those who will help me!
only I would need to understand how to spy on the sheet in question using pro/e wf4 commands. I understand that this is a double-curve surface, so it is not physically possible to smooth it without making any tears of the surface itself. things change if you think of areas that deform or contract in the double curvature zones...so drawing approximately a flat surface. pro/e surely contemplate these functions... but I can do it: eek:
thank you again and thank you to those who will help me!
Prof.
Guest
I think it's hard to spy on him. If you want me to try and rebuild it without the thickness. Bye.
tantanco45
Guest
Well I understand that it is difficult to spy on it, but you should be able to get an approximate flat surface! to every good account I attach the file as well as melo you asked:finger:
Thanks again
Thanks again
maxopus
Guest
insert > advanced > union flat surfaces
Andrea - Overcam
Guest
which is practically the same thing I did:
The only thing is that by doing this you will have to "explain" manually... always that the thicknesses are small (5 mm already seems hard...). alternating is to divide each face into a series of triangles to fold with a known angle.
The only thing is that by doing this you will have to "explain" manually... always that the thicknesses are small (5 mm already seems hard...). alternating is to divide each face into a series of triangles to fold with a known angle.
tantanco45
Guest
Thank you so much for your concern and help...maxopus to thank you, instead... I miss the words!
thank you very much...:smile:
thank you very much...:smile:
Prof.
Guest
if a surface is not developable you can only spy on it with the command that indicated you maxopus.
Bye.
Bye.