stop before collision

[Utente NX]

Hi.
is it possible to set stop before collision so that the collision occurs at zero and not at a certain distance?
If yes, could you put an image of the set?
I honestly looked in the help, but it talks about a set step that I can't find anywhere.
I use nx7 in English.

 

[The_Matrix]

in "move component" set the parameter
collision action at "stop before collision"
and
checking mode to "facet/solid"

If you're in dynamic, you're going very close. . .
If you want to go to zero use by constraints

 

[Utente NX]

in "move component" set the parameter
collision action at "stop before collision"
and
checking mode to "facet/solid"

If you're in dynamic, you're going very close. . .
If you want to go to zero use by constraints

My question was precise and clear.
approaching is not zero and by constraints is a positioning and does not perform any collision control.
The answer to my question is no.
the good that the assistance tells me is yes or no.
for this I wrote on this forum.
Anyway thank you for participating in the nx forum, which seems more desert than the sahara.

 

[IPdesign]

kind nx user I have as the impression that you took this forum for a kind of hotline.
I want you to know that people who want to respond to your complaints, contrary to the hotline, do not receive any compensation and do so using their free time, sometimes stolen from family affections or other activities that might be much more rewarding than feeling useless in providing some kind of help to a user who often criticizes soluzoni proposed.

in this forum you are not claiming answers, much more demanding answers in a short time and criticizing the "desert" forum (very less hot line desert that you pay fragrantly) , but you are confronted to find the best solution.

I hope that after my reply you will be clear that at least a little respect is due.

 

[Utente NX]

kind nx user I have as the impression that you took this forum for a kind of hotline.
I want you to know that people who want to respond to your complaints, contrary to the hotline, do not receive any compensation and do so using their free time, sometimes stolen from family affections or other activities that might be much more rewarding than feeling useless in providing some kind of help to a user who often criticizes soluzoni proposed.

in this forum you are not claiming answers, much more demanding answers in a short time and criticizing the "desert" forum (very less hot line desert that you pay fragrantly) , but you are confronted to find the best solution.

I hope that after my reply you will be clear that at least a little respect is due.

You're wrong, I didn't take this forum like some kind of hotline.
Normally nx users know more than siemens technicians, since we are above 8 hours a day.
I supported this Italian forum because the hotline of siemens italia did not satisfy me, among them contradict each other.
The criticism that I made in cadland was based on the fact that if one asks a clear and precise question, why should one answer with a solution that has nothing to do with the question?
if there is the answer you give, otherwise you do not answer.
This happens at school, at work and here...in my opinion.

I didn't demand answers and neither were given in a short time, never write things that I didn't write, this and one of the ugliest things that one can do... speak and write false things.
the fact that one does so taking away time to family commitments, those are own choices and nothing to do with it.
I wrote desert, because in my opinion, nx is used at a very low level by users and this shows a poor participation in the forum.

If you talk about respect, you were the first to accuse me of ignorance on the nx product, when in the end and all the contrary.
You don't know who I am and what level I have of nx knowledge.

 

[IPdesign]

You're wrong, I didn't take this forum like some kind of hotline.
Normally nx users know more than siemens technicians, since we are above 8 hours a day.
I supported this Italian forum because the hotline of siemens italia did not satisfy me, among them contradict each other.
The criticism that I made in cadland was based on the fact that if one asks a clear and precise question, why should one answer with a solution that has nothing to do with the question?
if there is the answer you give, otherwise you do not answer.
This happens at school, at work and here...in my opinion.

I didn't demand answers and neither were given in a short time, never write things that I didn't write, this and one of the ugliest things that one can do... speak and write false things.
the fact that one does so taking away time to family commitments, those are own choices and nothing to do with it.
I wrote desert, because in my opinion, nx is used at a very low level by users and this shows a poor participation in the forum.

If you talk about respect, you were the first to accuse me of ignorance on the nx product, when in the end and all the contrary.
You don't know who I am and what level I have of nx knowledge.

Well, after your answer, I can't help you on the whole line.
starting from the fact that I am ignorant about the use of nx .
Good permanence.

 

[The_Matrix]

The criticism that I made in cadland was based on the fact that if one asks a clear and precise question, why should one answer with a solution that has nothing to do with the question?

the solution is enough to look for it well in the menu of the move component.
(We hope that the super-moderators will not cancel this reply too)

 

[IPdesign]

. starting from the fact that I am ignorant about the use of nx ..

Of course, those who know me know the reason for certain words::wink:

 

[Utente NX]

the solution is enough to look for it well in the menu of the move component.
(We hope that the super-moderators will not cancel this reply too)

I did all the evidence of the case and read the help and came to the conclusion that you can not get to zero.
the movement is not continuous.
everything is done incrementally.
when collision detection is active and the object is moving, for each collision increase, a test is performed and if the objects are in collision state, the system returns to the previous position where there was no interference.
collision detection is, say 'preventive.
even if the step is small and the parts move slowly, there will always be some space between the objects when they are stopped following a collision.

By the way... how do you get nx7.5 and tc8.2 and your name the_matrix reminds me a lot of ugall... are you lost him?

 

[terzi88]

user nx are you interista??? ? ?

 

[The_Matrix]

I did all the evidence of the case and read the help and came to the conclusion that you can not get to zero.
the movement is not continuous.
everything is done incrementally.
when collision detection is active and the object is moving, for each collision increase, a test is performed and if the objects are in collision state, the system returns to the previous position where there was no interference.
collision detection is, say 'preventive.
even if the step is small and the parts move slowly, there will always be some space between the objects when they are stopped following a collision.

By the way... how do you get nx7.5 and tc8.2 and your name the_matrix reminds me a lot of ugall... are you lost him?

depends on your ultimate goal of getting to zero.
with the stop before collision, with the appropriate settings, to me, in a simple case, stopped at 0.06 mm (so for me it is zero... is called stop before collision on purpose).
If you have to get there at zero, then there is no scandal to use the "move by constraint" or, extreme ratio, but it seems to me to shoot with a butterfly cannon, with the assembly sequences.

What do you need to get to zero crack?