stripping couples

[monade]

Hello everyone, I need to ask you something that does not concern the cad.
So if I have a couple of creeping levers I know about the speeds and accelerations of a single lever, how do I get the speeds and accelerations of a point not belonging to the second lever?

Thank you in advance!

 

[Babeck]

Well you should post more details! It seems to me a problem of applied mechanics and my experience or are solved graphically by applying dynamic laws or analytically always with the usual laws. I can't tell you anything more.

Say hi.

 

[Fulvio Romano]

If you talk about speed and acceleration, the dynamic has nothing to do with it, and neither does the friction.

dynamics come into play if you talk about forces.

in principle knowing the cinematics of the first lever, you can know the law of motion of all its points. knowing the type of contact you can write an equation that binds the apparent point of contact (which may not be fixed) with a point of the second lever, from which it is possible to trace back to the law of motion of all its points.

if you place a scheme though it is better...

 

[sciolingelao]

If you talk about speed and acceleration, the dynamic has nothing to do with it, and neither does the friction.

dynamics come into play if you talk about forces.

I'm sorry but the acceleration and force applied are not tied? ? ?
ok for your note on passive forces, but... according to me you can quietly talk about dynamics, our friend has, in my opinion, committed no mistake!

 

[Babeck]

no, he is right fulvio, the dynamic studies the exchanges of forces considering also the actions of inertia. I still meant cinematic, but I confused the terms. However, I did not talk about attriti, from the cinematic study to the speed and trajectories of the components of the mechanism. to get the forces there is static or dynamic.

Say hi.

 

[sciolingelao]

no, he is right fulvio, the dynamic studies the exchanges of forces considering also the actions of inertia. I still meant cinematic, but I confused the terms. However, I did not talk about attriti, from the cinematic study to the speed and trajectories of the components of the mechanism. to get the forces there is static or dynamic.

Say hi.

but we do not know yet whether it is the usual graphic problem of applied mechanics.. . .
Sorry babeck, I just said talking about acceleration doesn't mean not to talk about dynamics....all here!
...and I'm not saying it, a guy said that if I'm not mistaken was called....mmh....ah, yes.....newton!

 

[MBT]

but we do not know yet whether it is the usual graphic problem of applied mechanics.. . .
Sorry babeck, I just said talking about acceleration doesn't mean not to talk about dynamics....all here!
...and I'm not saying it, a guy said that if I'm not mistaken was called....mmh....ah, yes.....newton!

If you're talking about accelerating by taking care of how these are born, then talk about cinematicIf you talk about the forces that intervene on a body to speed it up (including inertias and frictions), then talk about dynamics

 

[Fulvio Romano]

If you're talking about accelerating by taking care of how these are born, then talk about cinematicIf you talk about the forces that intervene on a body to speed it up (including inertias and frictions), then talk about dynamics

Right.

But by the way... other meteor?