volaff
Guest
you could always perform an analysis with ansys of your problem and see the solution if it is similar to yours. .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
eih64
Guest
because you say "as obvious" ... but excuse the patch test confirms that (I hope at least you did) that changing the convection (maybe putting it 1e-5, a cap) changes the thermal mapping.That's good.
strange that a solidworks technician noticed that by jumping 5 versions the software changes a lot. However on the patch test, once performed, no substantial differences (as obvious). Now the underlying problem is to understand what is wrong with my analysis but of course it can only help me who is practical with cosmos and has passed to solidworks 2012. thanks for the support! Good holidays.
Go back a little bit on your model. can not be the mathematical model (mesh) ... patch test shows ... what remains are ... materials (density,coeff. convective and coeff. conducting .control the orders of magnitude ... instead of immediately making the transient verification (so let a moment by steps of integration and thermal capacity) with a static (both in 2007 and 2012) ... to that point if everything comes back it is only to control the density, the specific heat and the logic of integration ...
Good job
ps. It is not a matter of being practical of cosmos .. and then I struggle to believe that those of cosmos have not guaranteed a compatibility between old and new, whatever way it is
Morin
Guest
problem solved! there is no compatibility between the format 2007 and 2012. it is necessary to save in parasolid the part under review realized in 2007 and after uploading the file and saved in 2012 to carry out the thermal study again in order to obtain the same result.
Morin
Guest
update on the thermal study carried out with solidworks 2012.
Fluodynamic analysis shows incongruent results to those obtained with the thermal study therefore on the question of the place beginslmene I confirm that the thermal study carried out in solidworks 2012 does not return reliable values.
Fluodynamic analysis shows incongruent results to those obtained with the thermal study therefore on the question of the place beginslmene I confirm that the thermal study carried out in solidworks 2012 does not return reliable values.
Morin
Guest
further update on the thermal study of solidworks 2012.
Fluodynamic analysis shows incongruent results to those obtained with the thermal study therefore on the question of the place to start is ascertained that the thermal study carried out in solidworks 2012 does not return reliable values.
the problem will be solved with the 2013 version sp3.0 that will be available shortly.
Greetings.
Fluodynamic analysis shows incongruent results to those obtained with the thermal study therefore on the question of the place to start is ascertained that the thermal study carried out in solidworks 2012 does not return reliable values.
the problem will be solved with the 2013 version sp3.0 that will be available shortly.
Greetings.