study design - only open source software?

[PierArg]

Bye to all,
I think the mac now many use it only for "mode".
Do you have any idea how many 14 year olds have the macbook only to fuck on facebook?

on my private pc I have double operating system: win7 and caelinux.
actually linux is much more performing...the problem is that it is "closed" and for everything I have to bang to look for the specific drivers. at the end productivity is less than windows because you lose a long time to configure anything.
last time I lost two days to find the drivers of the integrated camera with the result that the images were flipped.... since then I sent it to that country.

 

[Tristan]

I think the mac now many use it only for "mode".
Do you have any idea how many 14 year olds have the macbook only to fuck on facebook?

I agree... but you know, macos is derived from linux...
for the speech virus I personally since I bought my second laptop with x86 view in far 2007 I never took one and I changed 3 of os (view, 7 and 8). I'll be lucky. . .

 

[alberto.castiglioni]

a small incident, we are in a site where we talk about cad, and to what I find:

1) software cad for linux do not exist, indi linux is useless for 99% of users here' in

2) opensource video drivers are usually quite poor (try to use salome-meca with open drivers then we repair) and closed drivers typically support only the most recent graphics cards and xorg versions. so obsolescence in linux-cad is much faster than in windows-cad.

This is my ten-year experience, if yours is different good for you.

perfect: since one of the reasons of being of the site is inform you then you have to say all:
1 - pro-e was born for linux environments and only recently ptc abandoned the platform
1bis - there are several cad 2d and some 3d for linux both freeware and licensed and anyway all open-source. there are also rhino surface modelers absolutely freeware (indeed falls its assumption)
1ter- in my fifteenth experience I saw sw spin in linux on emulator win better than how they turned in win (more stability)
2- I think you tried linux when still ati and nvidia did not release the drivers for linux (which for about 4 years have been available). What did you try?

I would like to work in linux environment, unfortunately as already written the sw requested by my customers are no longer available. . so there is little to be cheerful.
greetings

 

[Tristan]

1ter- in my fifteenth experience I saw sw spin in linux on emulator win better than how they turned in win (more stability)

ad esempio?

 

[cacciatorino]

perfect: since one of the reasons of being of the site is inform you then you have to say all:
1 - pro-e was born for linux environments and only recently ptc abandoned the platform
1bis - there are several cad 2d and some 3d for linux both freeware and licensed and anyway all open-source. there are also rhino surface modelers absolutely freeware (indeed falls its assumption)
1ter- in my fifteenth experience I saw sw spin in linux on emulator win better than how they turned in win (more stability)
2- I think you tried linux when still ati and nvidia did not release the drivers for linux (which for about 4 years have been available). What did you try?

I would like to work in linux environment, unfortunately as already written the sw requested by my customers are no longer available. . so there is little to be cheerful.
greetings

So, pro/e for linux was no longer developed, probably because they used it too few.

There may be, but most are not suitable for professional use (professional = billing at the end of the month).

My experiences for linux are ancient and modern.

linux is stable as a server, but unfortunately the desktop environment does not, either because the update of the various libs and xorg is too frequent, and both because objectively many soft are written in an amateur manner. currently on seven software use of 1998 (paid millions of millions) and still works well (proposing wine to use a cad is an insult to reality, did you really try it?), from which you understand that microsoft protects my investments, linux (and macos) instead not.

denounce the issue of denote viruses that you probably have little experience with business systems, where this problem is quietly kept in mind: I of people who take the viruses know only the professors who put in the computer the students' keystrokes.

 

[alberto.castiglioni]

So, pro/e for linux was no longer developed, probably because they used it too few.

There may be, but most are not suitable for professional use (professional = billing at the end of the month).

My experiences for linux are ancient and modern.

linux is stable as a server, but unfortunately the desktop environment does not, either because the update of the various libs and xorg is too frequent, and both because objectively many soft are written in an amateur manner. currently on seven software use of 1998 (paid millions of millions) and still works well (proposing wine to use a cad is an insult to reality, did you really try it?), from which you understand that microsoft protects my investments, linux (and macos) instead not.

denounce the issue of denote viruses that you probably have little experience with business systems, where this problem is quietly kept in mind: I of people who take the viruses know only the professors who put in the computer the students' keystrokes.

denotes that you probably have few customers to import data from. I still remember when in skf (when I was their employee) there was a hustle and bustle for an epidemic. in fact skf is a small company of 42000 employees (at 2012)
Anyway: I don't say I'm working on wine, I say I made us turn pro-and 2001 (or 2000i1 I don't remember, it's been a while) and it was all right. Plus I even made it turn for femap-nastran...no problem
I can't stop laughing. As far as linux is concerned, it can also be true because there is no one to mourn us, but if you lean to canonical (e.g.) and you customise the system.. .
per rquanto regards the speech bookcases and frequency of updates is an argument so far from the reality to not deserve answer. but you were updating from dog repositories and pigs?

 

[Tristan]

I don't say I'm working on wine, I say I made us turn pro-and 2001 (or 2000i1 I don't remember, it's been a while) and it was all right. Plus I even made it turn for femap-nastran...no problem

"he was doing great" and "no problem" at my house doesn't mean he was doing better than under win, and anyway I think he's talking about prehistory. Since '99, it's been under the bridges, you know? !

 

[cacciatorino]

denotes that you probably have few customers to import data from. I still remember when in skf (when I was their employee) there was a hustle and bustle for an epidemic. in fact skf is a small company of 42000 employees (at 2012)
Anyway: I don't say I'm working on wine, I say I made us turn pro-and 2001 (or 2000i1 I don't remember, it's been a while) and it was all right. Plus I even made it turn for femap-nastran...no problem
I can't stop laughing. As far as linux is concerned, it can also be true because there is no one to mourn us, but if you lean to canonical (e.g.) and you customise the system.. .
per rquanto regards the speech bookcases and frequency of updates is an argument so far from the reality to not deserve answer. but you were updating from dog repositories and pigs?

Well, I upgraded from ubuntu vanilla 12 to ubuntu vanilla 13 and I didn't leave xorg anymore, because my ati card was no longer supported.

Anyway, use linux, I'll keep using s.o. that turns the soft I use, and then windows for the cad and linux for the fem, the tone you use is quite rude and not worth responding further.

 

[Tristan]

Well, I upgraded from ubuntu vanilla 12 to ubuntu vanilla 13 and I didn't leave xorg anymore, because my ati card was no longer supported.

update from kubuntu edgy eft to feisty fawn and I fucked everything. it didn't even start anymore...I had to format losing all the data. Since then I have abandoned the idea of using linux.

 

[Fulvio Romano]

below is explained quite well the change of operating system.

 

[cacciatorino]

below is explained quite well the change of operating system.View attachment 38354

The third case was about my path.

If I think about how long I lost to learn how to compile the fem software instead of learning how to use it.... there must also be a couple of tutorials written by me on how to install the software lassu in cyberspace!

 

[Tristan]

View attachment 38354

Lol!
... but it is very close to reality