subaxial coupling

[andreaf93]

Good evening to all,
I find this limit: I have two parts that pop up and then I create a set named "a".
I also have a general set with various parts and subaxis.

when I try to mate the under together "a" to a part of the general axieme does not give me the available couplings while if I try to mate these two components outside the general axieme (so in a new set not having other components or functions) I can safely. Why? Thank you.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

make a moment self-critical and reason... with a simple description of a situation of which there is none of the components and assemblies, nor of what procedures do: how can one even hypothesize a possible cause?
it is the first time you are told to attach images or files.
and also it would be nice that besides being active and responsive to ask you also made the effort to confirm if the solutions given you were useful type:https://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/pignoni-e-catene.52643/page-2#post-413057https://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/bordo-piegatura-inclinato.51908/#post-407810https://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/problematica-ripetizione-piatta.51324/#post-404337https://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/problema-accoppiamento.50851/#post-401216

 

[andreaf93]

make a moment self-critical and reason... with a simple description of a situation of which there is none of the components and assemblies, nor of what procedures do: how can one even hypothesize a possible cause?
it is the first time you are told to attach images or files.
and also it would be nice that besides being active and responsive to ask you also made the effort to confirm if the solutions given you were useful type:https://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/pignoni-e-catene.52643/page-2#post-413057https://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/bordo-piegatura-inclinato.51908/#post-407810https://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/problematica-ripetizione-piatta.51324/#post-404337https://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/problema-accoppiamento.50851/#post-401216

that I have to attach files or images I know but obviously in this case I can't do it, if you don't understand my question don't worry I will try to find the solution differently. for the answers you give me thank you because I am always useful if it is useful I will always comment the possible solutions.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

the question is quite clear, but without contextualization you have to imagine a situation in which your problem occurs in order to be able to look for it... in practice you have to reverse engeenering a description. . Hard enough.
If you find a solution to your problem it would be nice if you shared it

comment on the answers received, from which problems are resolved and/or other paths are found to do so, it is always useful; both for those in the future will find themselves in the same situation both for those who participated in the discussion that have confirmed what they said or learn something more if the chosen path was even slightly different.
This makes a forum grow, I don't like that they say little or nothing about the utility of the post they are stuck with.

 

[andreaf93]

I have overcome the problem by creating a new set where I perform the coupling of the sub along with and of the part; once coupled the two components I inserted everything into the general axieme.
I think that this is a way of circumventing the obstacle, surely there is another solution that makes you perform the coupling of the two components directly into the general axieme, anyway if you have to find the problem I will share it '