• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

subscribers to the albi, no longer need the p.iva

  • Thread starter Thread starter cacciatorino
  • Start date Start date
Hi hunting,

I thought it was mandatory that at least the legal representative of the company was enrolled in the register.

We make an example "civil" that compared to "mechanical" is easier interpretation.

Suppose we have to make the living line at the roof of the house. Do I have to address myself only and exclusively to a qualified engineer enrolled in the order or can I also address an engineering company?
of course it is a capital company so that it can enjoy legal personality.

I know that the example is stupid but I hope at least make the idea.
Clearly the signature must put the inscription on the register.

but what does it change, from a practical point of view, if who gives you the elaborate design is a prof. enrolled in the order or the employee hired by a rich Dutchman who opened an engineering company (which is still banned in Italy)? You say that if the owner is registered to the order then the project will be of better quality, or that the open society of the rich Dutch will not be legally responsible?
 
Occasional professional performance: Employees enrolled in albi must have the game ivathe Ministry of Economy corrects engineers and clarifies that compensations are equivalent to self-employment income
the clarification on the occasional performance for members of the Alps comes from the Ministry of Economy and Finance (mef) that in a letter of 25/02/ 2015 n. 4594, answers the doubts of arched in reference to the notes on the occasional works of the center studies of the national council of engineers
 
in my field engineering companies have always existed: what is a technical study with ten employees if not this? that then the owner is a member of the order or a shareholder of capital I do not think it changes much for practical purposes.

Sincerely I am strongly opposed to limiting competition by law, because ultimately what you get is to protect mediocre and level down. There is also to think that the cost of design is a small part of the cost of the work, so for the client I think that saving 20% on the cost of design is of limited importance.

Then I'm not sure that the engineering company has lower costs than the professional enrolled in the atbo so much that we can put it out of the market, but maybe I'm wrong, unless we talk about society with designers india or china but we face another class of problems.
They don't go india, just get to Albanian.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top