subsequent processing on assemblies

[Staedtlerp]

Good evening,
I have a problem: I have a set composed of a tree and two flanges. the flanges are welded on the tree at different distances from the extremes of the tree. in reality all the so composed assemblies should be worked on the lathe (planning, grinding) and milled (horse per key) after welding the flanges. Now, I would like to know if it is possible to carry out subsequent work on the assembly after welding so as to consider it a unique piece. I explain better, in the axieme the individual elements are raw without finishing and tolerances. I would like to create the assemblies and after doing some work on the same as rectification, bevels etc... is it possible?

 

[Vittorio]

Yes, of course. the next question? : how to do it?
if you have a set intervide on the individual parts and in the asmbling module you can perform some work. cutting holes etc.

 

[Staedtlerp]

in the meantime thank you for the answer :smile: I know that within a set it is enough to move into the individual parts to create the work on them. the problem is that by doing so you change the single part and when you go to the table the part will be updated (unless the islets). My problem is that I want to create the axieme with the individual raw parts (only welded together) and then on all the axieme create the finishing work. I would like to see that in the table of the axieme there are the finishing work, but in the table of the parts they are raw, that is, not worked. I don't know if I was clear.:finger:

 

[mcbramby]

do 2 parts x each piece....... in the assembly assemble the finished ones and put in the table the raw parts .... .... .
you could tie them to each other with a link . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . do the raw parts, then create the ends by copying them with links of the others and from there go on ........... obviously x change the final table (no crude) you will have to change the part of the crude and then continue on the other.
see what you want...... :wink:

 

[Staedtlerp]

Thank you guys. ..I thought there was a way to create some features of a set that didn't change the individual parts. I will do this: I create the axieme with the individual raw parts, then copy this together as a unique part with links (see that once welded it becomes a unique part) and realize the work on the latter:finger:
Thank you very much

 

[mcbramby]

then if you do so you don't need the assistance ................ create the part with 3 separate internal parts and then copy with links............

 

[Staedtlerp]

but thus losing the differentiation of the parts in the table, instead in this way I have both the welded assemblies and the welded (or part) assemblies.

 

[mcbramby]

Then okay......... in your last answer I must have misunderstood your lap........ cmq the important thing is that you did what you needed:finger:

 

[Staedtlerp]

:finger:grazie mille

 

[bandy]

Hello, unfortunately it does not work as in solidworks that you can do the work inside the axieme :frown:
you have to publish the raw body and paste it into a new part that you will then work
so you do not miss the link between worked and rough

 

[gianni55]

Hello, unfortunately it does not work as in solidworks that you can do the work inside the axieme :frown:

processing such as holes, cuts and pockets inside the axieme can be done, while addition or subtraction of body go (as I think it is more logical) attributed to a single and unique part.


Detailing operations etc. better to execute them within a part consisting of a multibody assembled with connection between them, this avoids that the "pipe" part that I am using at that time (and that is supposedly emitted and not in work in progress), is modified and saved without the right control of the designer.

if I work in my small everything is resolved, but if I have to work in a broader context, the emissions must be regulated more rigidly (part once issued: with the same name and revision the part must be equal in both my office and the rest of the world).

for example if in a set of a cart I loaded the wheel "hip" 24 times and I want to drill only one side and only one of the wheels "hip", if these are welded, I must issue a new number for the welded axeme, while if they are not soldered and remain separate parts, the wheel with the holes will necessarily be renamed "pipe variant 01".

Hi.

years ago