surface development

[loredi]

good morning to all, I can not get the flat repetition of this feature that I attach image.I have tried in all ways to solve the problem but I have found nothing specific . The sketch was based on a semiellisse. possible that it is too complex geometry? as I can proceed to achieve development. Thank you all in advance.

 

[Sasso SP]

hi I don't want to say a c....a but I don't think sw develops surfaces with the sheet module, try to give it thickness!

 

[sampom]

good morning to all, I can not get the flat repetition of this feature that I attach image.I have tried in all ways to solve the problem but I have found nothing specific . The sketch was based on a semiellisse. possible that it is too complex geometry? as I can proceed to achieve development. Thank you all in advance.

hi I don't want to say a c....a but I don't think sw develops surfaces with the sheet module, try to give it thickness!

it has spoken improperly of surface, but in fact it is not.
from the tree would seem a sheet metal body derived from the emptying of a solid. . @loredi If you post the file we'd better understand the problem.

In the meantime I can tell you that to make sheets you have to consider only bending and dimming. therefore only "simple" entities as lines and arches as it is in the reality of construction in workshop.
ellipses are not accepted by the program to obtain a sheet profile.
If you need that form you can't use the direct ellipse command, but "resolve it" so that you can build it with the compass as you used to.
an example:..so everything works and it is not the case that revenues from a solid emptied, do directly the profile sketch on a floor and use the command linguetta flangia on base.

Hello
marco

 

[sampom]

..ah,
and then in the folds there can be no living edges (so I think from your image).

greetings
Mar

 

[Mike1967]

the ellipse, and its fractions, non can be transformed into sheet metal.

 

[sampom]

the ellipse, and its fractions, non can be transformed into sheet metal.

Yes, indeed. What I said.
but if you take your profile to a traceable ellipse with tangent arches (the old "manual" design with 30° and compact) you also solve that development.

greetings
Marco:smile:

p.s. I'm trying multis, in a while, I'm telling you:wink:

 

[Mike1967]

Yes, indeed. What I said.
but if you take your profile to a traceable ellipse with tangent arches (the old "manual" design with 30° and compact) you also solve that development.

greetings
Marco:smile:

idem...

p.s. I'm trying multis, in a while, I'm telling you:wink:

a colleague of mine is trying on 64-bit w7 and told me there's a little better... but not to trust 100%, however I'm curious about your own
impression. ..:finger:

 

[sampom]

a colleague of mine is trying on 64-bit w7 and told me there's a little better... but not to trust 100%, however I'm curious about your own
impression. ..:finger:

for now win xp 32bit.. on the new company ws I put win7 64, then I will try there too.

still swx2010 3.1
it seems that the problem arises with the plates obtained from cutting of the previous one, both extruded and with divides.
if I add bodies in sheet metal below with the features these develop all correctly even at the table. I've tried a good show and no problem.
how do I cut the 2 only one works and the other or does not flatten or repeat the same development of the previous one. this if besides those cut there are other bodies, until the division in two pieces works.
and the problem is only at the table, because in the model they flatten all correctly and then you wouldn't expect the error.

now I prepare dinner:smile: and then I send you the file and considerations. . .

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[Mike1967]

for now win xp 32bit.. on the new company ws I put win7 64, then I will try there too.

still swx2010 3.1
it seems that the problem arises with the plates obtained from cutting of the previous one, both extruded and with divides.
if I add bodies in sheet metal below with the features these develop all correctly even at the table. I've tried a good show and no problem.
how do I cut the 2 only one works and the other or does not flatten or repeat the same development of the previous one. this if besides those cut there are other bodies, until the division in two pieces works.
and the problem is only at the table, because in the model they flatten all correctly and then you wouldn't expect the error.

now I prepare dinner:smile: and then I send you the file and considerations. . .

greetings
Marco:smile:

Meanwhile, thanks for this feedback, you have found my own issues.
I wonder what the betatesters have tested?

 

[re_solidworks]

Meanwhile, thanks for this feedback, you have found my own issues.
I wonder what the betatesters have tested?

Why do they still have them??? ? I thought that to reduce the costs in time of crisis they had fired them all!

 

[loredi]

I thank you for your interest, in fact I would need the flat repetition to work also with plates with non-cylindrical or corner sections, provided they are always developable. Thanks good work.

 

[sampom]

In fact, I would need the flat repetition to work with sheet metal with non-cylindrical or corner sections, as long as it can always be developed.

Yes, as long as you can "harden" them to build profiles with arc segments (besides straight lines, clear).. as in the real working with sheet (the calandra "arrotola" the plates according to a circular trajectory, from there does not run away).

greetings
Mar