surfaces: multisection, from sweep, from connections, from fittings...

[panormus]

hi designers/projectors,

I go back to writing with my usual training questions hoping not to be boring or bother too much.

finished the audi r8 I returned to my beloved world of flight trying to reproduce a Chocolate 26 However, starting from a somewhat cagous triptych and probably some aeromodellist who sketched its forms; I have not found better at the moment, but the purpose is to exercise and learning.

arrived at the tail plane and broke a little the rudder without a precise criterion, but assuming what could be the pieces that allow me to use the multi-sections I have realized how attached. .

How can I make a better surface?

bye and thanks

 

[peloritano]

tick the deviation item and bring tolerance to 0.01 or 0.1... I usually work. . .

 

[panormus]

tick the deviation item and bring tolerance to 0.01 or 0.1... I usually work. . .

Nothing to do.. .

 

[panormus]

a little better now, but as an attachment I can't remove the draft that is created by the fuse and the beginning of the tail rudder.

 

[ferrezio]

The deformation is due to me telling you in the photo.
the surface indicated near the arc in common with the new, degenerates therefore the condition in tangeza that cheques degenerate the new surface.

also the previous multisection that I call you degenerates due to the frontal surface of the rudder.

When you face a modeling with superfice the first important thing to identify only the surfaces that control the shape, then the connection surfaces are defined.

In your case first you have to build the rudder's superficce, then construct the helm-tailed surface.

Hi.

 

[panormus]

I'll let you know.