• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

symmetrically, possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter piccio__87
  • Start date Start date

piccio__87

Guest
Hello.
is it possible to symmetrically bind two parts equal to the same detail? (to save time)

es: I have bound a particular in the "right" part of the particular "base"; I want to bind the same detail to the left without inserting all the parameters.. .

possible?

I own inventor 2009.
 
Hello.
is it possible to symmetrically bind two parts equal to the same detail? (to save time)

es: I have bound a particular in the "right" part of the particular "base"; I want to bind the same detail to the left without inserting all the parameters.. .

possible?

I own inventor 2009.
I don't think you can do it, but if you have a "group" of details you want to copy and not serialize with the component copy, select your parts -> change settings so that you reuse all parts and don't generate new ones -> and clikki in the screen. in this way it keeps you all bounds between the adjacent parts you copied....
It's not what you asked but it can always be useful.
 
Thank you very much peppe!!
It is that when you have so many constraints to put...and not all properly standard...it becomes complicated. .
 
Bye-bye
if I don't remember badly if you do the mirror control components make you choose if you create new components (with different suffixes or prefixes), say no, reuse the parts and activate the assignment of constraints automatically. You clearly need the central component halfway plan. try and then tell me:finger:
 
Mechanicalmg.. . .
Bye-bye
if I don't remember badly if you do the mirror control components make you choose if you create new components (with different suffixes or prefixes), say no, reuse the parts and activate the assignment of constraints automatically. You clearly need the central component halfway plan. try and then tell me
even if you can make a mirror in a set, how procedure is not better to avoid because it could be unmanageable if in the future it will have to make changes?
 
I'd say no because you can replace the parts you don't want tomorrow. if now you have the main piece with right to and left b where at is equal to b because a fake "specchia" has been made using always to... is how to take and regain .... only that makes everything inventor
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top