table with multibody parts

[deep70]

Hello everyone,
I always used inventor with std methodology, that is, non multibody so much to tell us, a customer asks for the table masses of a frame modeled with this criterion, and so far zero problems, but when is the time to compile the cartiglio with its distinct materials as you do?
Usually the table goes to fish the properties from the parts that make up the axieme, but when dealing with a multibody how you proceed?
Thank you all in advance for the answers given.

 

[Catafratto]

I imagine that "Manual Compilation" as in the time of the tecnigraph is not the answer you would like to hear, but honestly nothing alternative comes to mind. . .

edit:
you may also "explode" the multibody with the management command>creates components to quickly get a set and quota that, but it would still be necessary to put in place the iproperties of each generated component: That would be more neat, but I don't think it's faster... always that the initial multibody is made appropriately.

 

[deep70]

I imagine that "Manual Compilation" as in the time of the tecnigraph is not the answer you would like to hear, but honestly nothing alternative comes to mind. . .

I imagined, in fact I have already gone on like this.
thanks for the answer anyway.
Good day to you.

 

[Giancesa]

I don't know if you know what to do with a lotbodies, it's very easy and also functional. In fact, you will get a set that does not need to place the parts but are all fixed. I often use this method: I leave on a multibodi side that will be connected to the axieme that they go to create, if I make changes to the part multibodies automatically modifies the axieme. you proceed, on the multibodes side, going to highlight all solids and then do with button dx "create components" then follow the indications".
then to quickly compile the ipros of each component, open the separate components.

 

[deep70]

I don't know if you know what to do with a lotbodies, it's very easy and also functional. In fact, you will get a set that does not need to place the parts but are all fixed. I often use this method: I leave on a multibodi side that will be connected to the axieme that they go to create, if I make changes to the part multibodies automatically modifies the axieme. you proceed, on the multibodes side, going to highlight all solids and then do with button dx "create components" then follow the indications".
then to quickly compile the ipros of each component, open the separate components.

Hello, Jan.
Yes, well, it depends, the thing is subjective, I personally prefer to draw each part and then assemble the axieme, especially if it is quite complicated and big assemblies.