tavole e layer

[Nicken]

Hello, girl.
How many of you use different layers in the tables? !

I for example do not use different layers...but I make more tables....also because putting them on the table the various views is very fast...so I am better to make more tables... than a table with different quotas or annotations in different layers.

 

[Mike1967]

I only use them if I have to export the table in dxf and in other rare cases, for example
when I need to put components on different layers.

 

[Oldwarper]

in one I put the quotas, in another the annotations (spines, axes, cosmetic threads), in another (stamps) the finished detail, in another still the lines of section (before making them become sections) one with bubbles, carts and distinct. each with its character, color and line thickness, so that they are distinguishable and possibly eliminateable temporarily from the view.
the display or not of the components (which can be easily reversed, not as the option hides board components) I manage it at the level together with the display states. more rarely with configurations.

the layers, although autocad heritage, remain indispensable.

 

[Nicken]

in one I put the quotas, in another the annotations (spines, axes, cosmetic threads), in another (stamps) the finished detail, in another still the lines of section (before making them become sections) one with bubbles, carts and distinct. each with its character, color and line thickness, so that they are distinguishable and possibly eliminateable temporarily from the view.
the display or not of the components (which can be easily reversed, not as the option hides board components) I manage it at the level together with the display states. more rarely with configurations.

the layers, although autocad heritage, remain indispensable.

I unlike you I create a table for every "print."...mmmmh are undecided on how to do...if to use more layers I did with the good autocad...and more tables.

 

[Oldwarper]

I unlike you I create a table for every "print."...mmmmh are undecided on how to do...if to use more layers I did with the good autocad...and more tables.

:confused
Say...

Don't you just confuse the "layer" with the "layouts"?

Because if that's how your approach is wrong.

in a table you can have many sheets (the one that autocad calls "layout", I had never been able to make me want to use one...), which then are printed individually. what in autocad is the model space in swx is the axieme/part, what is the paper space, consisting of many layers, in swx is the table, consisting of many sheets.
the beautiful is that in swx you can put in a same table/sheet different models.

what you lose by doing in each table a single sheet is the count of the sections, the number of details, the distinct and the views relative to the same detail and the having to open all times different tables for a single vision of together.
I usually divide only by making the overall sheets in one table, in another the details. But if I want the exact number of details, I have to make a "fittitious" sheet with the asympies from which the system goes to take the properties.

 

[Mike1967]

:confused
Say...
Don't you just confuse the "layer" with the "layouts"?

Because if that's how your approach is wrong.in a table you can have many sheets (the one that autocad calls "layout", I had never been able to make me want to use one...), which then are printed individually. what in autocad is the model space in swx is the axieme/part, what is the paper space, consisting of many layers, in swx is the table, consisting of many sheets.
the beautiful is that in swx you can put in a same table/sheet different models.

what you lose by doing in each table a single sheet is the count of the sections, the number of details, the distinct and the views relative to the same detail and the having to open all times different tables for a single vision of together.
I usually divide only by making the overall sheets in one table, in another the details. But if I want the exact number of details, I have to make a "fittitious" sheet with the asympies from which the system goes to take the properties.

I was writing the same thing...:smile:

 

[Nicken]

no...so not confuse layer layout I know their difference and their use...
but I only have this grudge:

I have a set that is a welded iron struttra....composed by different parts... .
In the first table I put the axieme in the views with the quotas... in the second I put the axieme in sight with the welding annotations. . .
in the third I put the assembling with the bubble of the various parts... in the tables to follow I put the parts...one per table with the views and the relative quotas.


Now I ask myself...in the first boards of assemblies...it is better if I use layer and then put the quotas in one layer, the bubbles in another and the welding annotations in another still... or is it okay as I did?!? ! ?

 

[eboss]

the layers in this case do not give you benefits or that...so as the utility has already been explained you can not appreciate it more than much in the management of the tables in swx, quotation, printing etc...
If you have to export those tables to dxf/dwg to give them to some third party or other needs then you will find yourself in the dxf/dwg boards that you will open with autocad with the layers that you have set to swx and you can manage them as autocad layers.

 

[Nicken]

the layers in this case do not give you benefits or that...so as the utility has already been explained you can not appreciate it more than much in the management of the tables in swx, quotation, printing etc...
If you have to export those tables to dxf/dwg to give them to some third party or other needs then you will find yourself in the dxf/dwg boards that you will open with autocad with the layers that you have set to swx and you can manage them as autocad layers.

I didn't think of it....effectively if I have to give it to a third party .. and this has only autocad... it finds itself "more comfortable" having more layers. .


thank you very much for the info

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I didn't think of it....effectively if I have to give it to a third party .. and this has only autocad... it finds itself "more comfortable" having more layers. .


thank you very much for the info

in this case may also be useful the mapping that allows you to export to dwg/dxf by assigning to geometry, axes, odds etc certain layers with its settings

 

[Nicken]

in this case may also be useful the mapping that allows you to export to dwg/dxf by assigning to geometry, axes, odds etc certain layers with its settings

in what sense the mapping

Do you have friuli?! ! ?

 

[Ivan1990]

in what sense the mapping

Do you have friuli?! ! ?

when you take to dwg/dxt you can set a sort of table where all geometries and notes etc.etc of solidworks, the corresponding autocads you want.

 

[re_solidworks]

I use the layers. I use them to distinguish the quotas imported from the model with respect to the quotas for pure annotative purpose inserted in the table. I use them for welding symbols which in some cases should be shown and in others not.
I use them to have more information on the same folder to enable and disable at the moment, etc....
during the extraction in dwg I can avoid mapping the elements already on a layer, but still use mapping and get dwg perfectly consistent with my autocad settings without doing anything.

 

[erik.bo]

What a handle!

Isn't it that you could attach a file so you could figure out how you work?
I am mainly interested in the fact of turning on and off annotations at the table.. .

also a simple part or together (pictured with notes like pop...etc..) just to see what you can do.. .
Thank you in advance.

 

[eboss]

Now I don't know what needs you have but you can take the cue and do as you think... I've attached the file and the video to you.
I hope you clarify your ideas.

 

[re_solidworks]

What a handle!

Isn't it that you could attach a file so you could figure out how you work?
I am mainly interested in the fact of turning on and off annotations at the table.. .

also a simple part or together (pictured with notes like pop...etc..) just to see what you can do.. .
Thank you in advance.

are very simple functions that we have used for years, if you see them at work it is only a question of planning work anticipating the needs of the table.
I can't put an example to you right away as the files I have are all of clients from whom I have nothing to do with publishing anything.
As soon as I can make you an example, and I'll place it for you.