Abiuane
Guest
I put my rendering on you. I know that compared to many of you, it is worthwhile, but I ask advice on what was better.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Last edited by a moderator:
render54
Guest
for stains on plaster read:
problem with interior rendering (black on plaster)
with the light that enters from the window door, you had to do
interior-only sunlight
for me it is too deformed, maybe you pulled the edge of the camera view only on one side
problem with interior rendering (black on plaster)
with the light that enters from the window door, you had to do
interior-only sunlight
for me it is too deformed, maybe you pulled the edge of the camera view only on one side
Abiuane
Guest
Hello, thank you.
I just finished reading your topic and in the second rendering that I'm doing the stains are gone.
As for deformation, I can't correct it! I don't know how to do this! I searched in the forum, in the online guide but I find nothing that helps me understand how to do.
I just finished reading your topic and in the second rendering that I'm doing the stains are gone.
As for deformation, I can't correct it! I don't know how to do this! I searched in the forum, in the online guide but I find nothing that helps me understand how to do.
Giuseppe Mauro
Guest
I don't know how revit imposed the room, but this render uses the equivalent of a wide-angle camera (something like a 15-20mm), with the distortions it entails (even unnatural in truth, a wide-angle distorts more to barrels).
If there is a "focus length" parameter (maximum for example, the focal length of the room is adjusted), it should be approached to a 50mm, that the optics closest to normal human view.
lower focal values (35, 28 and so on) widen the field of vision, but deform the view, exalting the depth plans.
Higher focal values (80, 100 etc) narrow the field of vision and compress the depth plans.
I repeat, I don't know revit. If it were 3dstudio, I would tell you to put the focal at 50mm or at maximum at 35mm
but being 2 autodesk programs, perhaps the focal point of the room find it.
If there is a "focus length" parameter (maximum for example, the focal length of the room is adjusted), it should be approached to a 50mm, that the optics closest to normal human view.
lower focal values (35, 28 and so on) widen the field of vision, but deform the view, exalting the depth plans.
Higher focal values (80, 100 etc) narrow the field of vision and compress the depth plans.
I repeat, I don't know revit. If it were 3dstudio, I would tell you to put the focal at 50mm or at maximum at 35mm
but being 2 autodesk programs, perhaps the focal point of the room find it.
Tristan
Guest
no, in revit there is no "focal" parameter.
I don't believe the lamp material.
I don't believe the lamp material.
render54
Guest
render54
Guest
Abiuane
Guest
Here is the camera
Last edited by a moderator:
render54
Guest
the red target ball is not aligned with the blue ball, meaning you pulled a edge of the view making the window asymmetrical to the axis of the room and this increases the deformation.
you can quietly turn off the closet and move the camera to the wall wire behind, gain space
If you're using the revit doors, they're all right.
you can quietly turn off the closet and move the camera to the wall wire behind, gain space
If you're using the revit doors, they're all right.
Abiuane
Guest
Well, what to say: first of all thank you! I'll do some evidence and then place it.
Unfortunately the door is more recent than my revit (2010) and therefore I cannot use it. Thank you
Unfortunately the door is more recent than my revit (2010) and therefore I cannot use it. Thank you
asalalp
Guest
*render54
Very nice door. Thank you.
Very nice door. Thank you.
render54
Guest
in the rar there is this rvt file that is dated year 2009, will be done with revit 2010 there are inside the doors
render54
Guest
approfiterol:36_1_11: