• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

tilting faces

  • Thread starter Thread starter maca paca
  • Start date Start date

maca paca

Guest
good evening to all,I am a new entry..I need some advice on the projection of a plate that has this front view. to represent in true shape the 2 sloping faces can I make a tipping using the plan in red?
Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • StillCap0011.webp
    StillCap0011.webp
    5.5 KB · Views: 26
good evening to all,I am a new entry..I need some advice on the projection of a plate that has this front view. to represent in true shape the 2 sloping faces can I make a tipping using the plan in red?
Thank you.
we say better, if you want to represent any element through technical design You must have use at least two views, one front and the other orthogonal at the first, in your case the view from above is the most indicated.

n.b. is appreciated, and highly recommended, the presentation for new users; to know how and where you read "small regulation" of this section.

Bye.
 
Sorry for not presenting,I am not expert on forums. study industrial engineering and I hope to be able to contribute somehow:)thanks.
However I have already made the 2 short-sighted views and from above, but I'm not sure that to truly represent the tilted faces is a good turn on that floor
 
the sufficient views are 2: front where quoti angles, thickness, bending points, beams and hole possion compared to a defined plane.
from the top where you have the width, the position of the holes compared to the planes or a symmetry axis and show that there are no, or there are any other geometries.
possibly you can make a view from above with the particular stretch and marking the bending lines, but it is usually required by the workshop or technical office that commissioned the job if it is the case.
I think the auxiliary view over the tilted plane is unnecessary only to quote the holes.
 
good evening to all,I am a new entry..I need some advice on the projection of a plate that has this front view. to truly represent the 2 sloping faces I can make a tipping using the red top?
grazie
No.
you have to use a tilted plane for the tilted face (the face itself acts as a plane), and "project" the lines perpendicular to that plane/face
I think the auxiliary view over the tilted plane is unnecessary only to quote the holes.
It's true in practice. .
but if they require <<rappresentare delle="" facce="" forma="" inclinate="" la="" vera="">> is "obligatory" the use of auxiliary view (the projection compared to that tilted plane above)</rappresentare>
 
I had designed this way, projecting the significant points with the compass on the red plane and then projecting them into the po. Is this representation correct? I attach a sketch (not accurate:)) and the original image of the piece I must represent.
 

Attachments

  • StillCap0010.webp
    StillCap0010.webp
    9.2 KB · Views: 21
  • Immagine.webp
    Immagine.webp
    42.4 KB · Views: 9
I had designed this way, projecting the significant points with the compass on the red plane and then projecting them into the po. ...is this representation correct? .
Yeah. if you use the compass to "project" the points; the important thing is that the resulting view lies on a "parallel plane" to those tilted faces.. I mean, you see them front.
 
I had designed this way, projecting the significant points with the compass on the red plane and then projecting them into the po. Is this representation correct? I attach a sketch (not accurate:)) and the original image of the piece I must represent.
In my opinion, in this case, we need the view in the plant to quote the 4 central holes, plus two local overturns on the front for quoater the remaining hole and the gaps.

to make the furbastries sum up tippings and real plant making the plant of the developed piece (if it was possible clearly).
 
I decided to do it with auxiliary views because prof prefers them. Is this representation correct with the broken piece in 3 parts? the photo is not very sharp, in correspondence of the breaks there is zigzagata line. Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • SANY0270.webp
    SANY0270.webp
    324.2 KB · Views: 12
I decided to do it with auxiliary views because prof prefers them. Is this representation correct with the broken piece in 3 parts? the photo is not very sharp, in correspondence of the breaks there is zigzagata line. Thank you.
Correct!

to produce it would miss the quotas of the folds, however it is correct!...
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
ciao
Back
Top