to renew distinct basic components.

[leggera]

Hello.

I made some confusion in the table and now I have a rev 02 design with special balls with numbers.
now I have the rev 03 with the ball completely different.
I would like to know how in the manual you can change the balls and then the position in the manual to make the two versions of the table reassemble.

Thank you.

 

[laura888]

double click on the distinct in the idw.
you can refresh the components and also vary the other fields. I attach image to clarify: blue fields have been modified.
greetings

 

[leggera]

I have already tried, when I go to save the new distinct state, it brings me back to the original state. .

I'm done.

 

[Zac69]

I have already tried, when I go to save the new distinct state, it brings me back to the original state. .

I'm done.

do it in the axieme. from there the distinct table follows step-by-step

 

[leggera]

perfect!!!

You have to do it together.

Thank you!

 

[FRANKMARTIN]

perfect!!!

You have to do it together.

Thank you!

Hello, everyone
I modified the order of the pieces in the separate base of the axieme, but the table (in the table) does not take the change. . .
Can someone tell me where I'm wrong?
Thank you.

 

[Matteo Cappelli dis.CAD]

cation
I will make it
1 ) rinumera manually2) reorder by item3) save replacement

 

[FRANKMARTIN]

cation
I will make it
1 ) rinumera manuallyView attachment 514792) reorder by itemView attachment 514803) save replacementView attachment 51482

Thank you, now I try

 

[bradipo666]

in alternativa...https://apps.autodesk.com/invntor/it/detail/index?id=6329510225274883977&applang=en&os=win32_64

 

[FRANKMARTIN]

in alternativa...https://apps.autodesk.com/invntor/it/detail/index?id=6329510225274883977&applang=en&os=win32_64

Thank you.

 

[Ighi]

cation
I will make it
1 ) rinumera manuallyView attachment 514792) reorder by itemView attachment 514803) save replacementView attachment 51482

Good morning
politely where I find this window “list parts” with creo 5. Thank you so much!

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

@ighi, you're writing in an inventor's argument.
You have already opened 3 identical discussions. who will answer you in one of those.
At school maybe you go into the classroom randomly, the first one that happens? or do you ask for clarification on 2nd grade equations to the Latin teacher? I presume and hope not.

 

[Ighi]

@ighi, you're writing in an inventor's argument.
You have already opened 3 identical discussions. who will answer you in one of those.
At school maybe you go into the classroom randomly, the first one that happens? or do you ask for clarification on 2nd grade equations to the Latin teacher? I presume and hope not.

Good morning
I clearly did not do it on purpose. It is perhaps the third time I ask for clarification here and I am not very experienced. I apologize anyway and sure I wouldn't ask for clarifications on second degree equations if I knew I had to deal with a Latin prof. greetings

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I clearly did not do it on purpose. It is perhaps the third time I ask for clarification here and I am not very experienced.

Okay.
in the future, always check the discussion in which you accredit yourself to which section it belongs and if it is inherent to your question.
no longer open identical posts because they would disperse the answers received.
by its very nature a forum requires patience and is therefore absolutely to avoid reporting its discussion among the messages in sight, the cossidetto up.
reread the Regulation the forum
would also like a presentation

 

[PIETRO2002]

Okay.
in the future, always check the discussion in which you accredit yourself to which section it belongs and if it is inherent to your question.
no longer open identical posts because they would disperse the answers received.
by its very nature a forum requires patience and is therefore absolutely to avoid reporting its discussion among the messages in sight, the cossidetto up.
reread the Regulation the forum
would also like a presentation

Don't hurt, but a little more sympathy wouldn't hurt!

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Don't hurt, but a little more sympathy wouldn't hurt!

I don't take it for a legitimate and accurate observation.
But let me ask you how I should be more sympathetic? in other posts I was abrupt, rude not even seems to me if this adjective is very subjective, and at times quite caustic, but in this I only gave explanations to those who declare themselves inexperienced. Should I put the faces?
I am not a person tending to ilarity so doing the sympathetic a priori I get hard

 

[PIETRO2002]

I don't take it for a legitimate and accurate observation.
But let me ask you how I should be more sympathetic? in other posts I was abrupt, rude not even seems to me if this adjective is very subjective, and at times quite caustic, but in this I only gave explanations to those who declare themselves inexperienced. Should I put the faces?
I am not a person tending to ilarity so doing the sympathetic a priori I get hard

In my opinion there are several ways to say things, but each one of us is different, maybe I'm wrong to see what's wrong and I do mental elucubrations. but a little lightness and kindness of these times does not spoil.

 

[Peppe]

In my opinion there are several ways to say things, but each one of us is different, maybe I'm wrong to see what's wrong and I do mental elucubrations. but a little lightness and kindness of these times does not spoil.

Dear parish priest, I understand your thought but I also understand the mass.
personally I have been registered since far 2006 and I grew up together with this forum and some users and together we made several very productive discussions.
the thing that has been known lately by several users is almost a lack of desire/ability to search on the net, in the forum or from other parts ideas and/or solution to problems on the software. users who spend minutes to open discussions in my opinion useless, where in the middle of the time the same question asked google would give different results and without disturbing the patience and professionalism of the most navigated users of the forum.
queries or doubts are placed without even having tried first on the software to understand where perplexities are or else to ask for help. I don't know if for lack of time, want or just because it's easier to debate your problem on the forum in the hope that some good Samaritan will come to help.
personally this thing makes me a little angry because thinking about how long I spent until late in the evening doing tests, angry and some blasphemy to understand where I was wrong and what the software wanted.

the massive user only highlighted what in 2006 was law: read the rule without if and without but then try to understand what to ask.

so pietro if 2002 is your year of birth you must understand that if by kindness or lightness you intend to accompany each user with comforting or sweet words towards the solution of the problem then I am sorry but the way is this and reality and well different from how the pictures, but I do not want to give life lessons to anyone.

I apologize but for a long time I had this thought and took advantage of the fold taken to this discussion to say mine.

 

[Ighi]

Dear parish priest, I understand your thought but I also understand the mass.
personally I have been registered since far 2006 and I grew up together with this forum and some users and together we made several very productive discussions.
the thing that has been known lately by several users is almost a lack of desire/ability to search on the net, in the forum or from other parts ideas and/or solution to problems on the software. users who spend minutes to open discussions in my opinion useless, where in the middle of the time the same question asked google would give different results and without disturbing the patience and professionalism of the most navigated users of the forum.
queries or doubts are placed without even having tried first on the software to understand where perplexities are or else to ask for help. I don't know if for lack of time, want or just because it's easier to debate your problem on the forum in the hope that some good Samaritan will come to help.
personally this thing makes me a little angry because thinking about how long I spent until late in the evening doing tests, angry and some blasphemy to understand where I was wrong and what the software wanted.

the massive user only highlighted what in 2006 was law: read the rule without if and without but then try to understand what to ask.

so pietro if 2002 is your year of birth you must understand that if by kindness or lightness you intend to accompany each user with comforting or sweet words towards the solution of the problem then I am sorry but the way is this and reality and well different from how the pictures, but I do not want to give life lessons to anyone.

I apologize but for a long time I had this thought and took advantage of the fold taken to this discussion to say mine.

I have rightly accepted the response of massives and I apologized, everything is missing. I still realized I was an ant compared to the giants of this forum. It is natural that before he slew and tried to dx and to sx losing even hours. too many dots on “i” when I actually needed a push to continue. That's all right. I don't want to bother anyone. step and close

 

[PIETRO2002]

Dear parish priest, I understand your thought but I also understand the mass.
personally I have been registered since far 2006 and I grew up together with this forum and some users and together we made several very productive discussions.
the thing that has been known lately by several users is almost a lack of desire/ability to search on the net, in the forum or from other parts ideas and/or solution to problems on the software. users who spend minutes to open discussions in my opinion useless, where in the middle of the time the same question asked google would give different results and without disturbing the patience and professionalism of the most navigated users of the forum.
queries or doubts are placed without even having tried first on the software to understand where perplexities are or else to ask for help. I don't know if for lack of time, want or just because it's easier to debate your problem on the forum in the hope that some good Samaritan will come to help.
personally this thing makes me a little angry because thinking about how long I spent until late in the evening doing tests, angry and some blasphemy to understand where I was wrong and what the software wanted.

the massive user only highlighted what in 2006 was law: read the rule without if and without but then try to understand what to ask.

so pietro if 2002 is your year of birth you must understand that if by kindness or lightness you intend to accompany each user with comforting or sweet words towards the solution of the problem then I am sorry but the way is this and reality and well different from how the pictures, but I do not want to give life lessons to anyone.

I apologize but for a long time I had this thought and took advantage of the fold taken to this discussion to say mine.

I was already tired of working in 2002! to be kind does not want to be good or to be broken! It's a matter of style, lucky who owns it or aspires to have it!