together solidworks

[Gabi Scantamburlo]

Good morning, I have a question for you if you can help me.
I have been using solidworks for several years and I have never found myself so hard: (water valves)
data : valves of various nominal diameters from dn50 to dn 600,
pressure reduction circuit with a pilot 100 unidirectional pin valve fittings, a y filter with ogiva, a glycerine pressure gauge 0-16 bar and 4/5 two-way ball valves.
design and design the first valve with its circuit.
Once the valve rhyme is finished, I have to switch to the other valve with the largest nominal diameter. the input and output centerings + entry into the valve cap are not always equal are dependent on the valve dn. I'll still take you back below the picture.
I am currently having to do + 340 drawings.
attention the starting circuit (made first) is repeated also in the others change the coupling centers of the inputs and outputs.
I would like to reduce timing. as a rule I make a pack and go of the 3d assembly file, and table2d. then I go to replace the body I want and click ok. I will notice that there are intersections between tubes and components then in this case unravel all the components and I regroup them. I remember, however, that there is a method to facilitate all of my process.(more quickly)
Is there a system that when I change the valve I realline all the components with couplings and heights? I also tried to create axes but I'm not able to.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

How are the valves made? :
a unique file with different configurations?
each valve a different file?
Are the valves native solidworks or imported files?
a similar work expressly requires working with relations between the parties; Did you?

 

[Gabi Scantamburlo]

each valve a different file.
allego manager .. valve + hat cn bolts is a set that however it is born already by default ..in the sense that I have folders with the valves already created. idem for the pilot and pin valve. the rest all absent.. I apologize for the delay. .
"a similar work expressly requires working with relations between the parties"
What do you mean? couplings
p.s. in subsets there are no configurations
Thank you very much

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

matings are not relations between the parties.
for relations between the parties means a link for which two or more files depend on each other.

So the valve is a set that fishes its components in various folders?
you must have a file that always has the same entities; you can create a part file with inside one or more sketches representing the valve coupling points.
each valve must have a dedicated file derived from master.
This part shall not be bound by the valve, but must have in common the origin, plans or other coupling system.
insert the part into the piping axieme will adapt to the valve by changing the sketch.
in practice:
builds the first together with the inside valve, part for the constraints, piping
you make a copy of the axieme and replaces valve and part for the constraints; the valve is completely independent and will not have repercussions, the part being a copy of the previous and independent from the valve will maintain the constraints with piping
the piping will follow the position of the sketch of the part, sketch that will be modified by hand to adapt it to the valve

 

[Gabi Scantamburlo]

now I will try thank you anyway for the answer.. and of the council

 

[Gabi Scantamburlo]

for relations between the parties means a link for which two or more files depend on each other. .
How do you do that? I don't remember

 

[SimoneCRV]

another solution to sketches, can be magnetic couplings.
I use very much and are comfortable

 

[Gabi Scantamburlo]

others?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

for relations between the parties means a link for which two or more files depend on each other. .
How do you do that? I don't remember

in the environment together and three in change of one part and the constraints (through quotas, sketches, relationships) to another part or to the assemblies.
So I got a little contradicted before.
if the part for the coupling of the piping has listed sketches does not need external references, if instead it binds it to the valve (what feasible, but to check) will have external references

 

[Gabi Scantamburlo]

You make me an example really are in crisis...... .

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

You make me an example really are in crisis...... .

Who are you talking to?
example of what?

 

[Gabi Scantamburlo]

I apologize to you

Who are you talking to?
example of what?

the mi scusi law

 

[Gabi Scantamburlo]

I apologize to you

Excuse me

?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

?

ti ho already noted once that the upside of the discussions is forbidden by the regulation!
I asked you "example of what" and you didn't answer.

specified these 2 points, I do not use more solidworks and therefore I cannot attach any example of not know what, I wrote a procedure to point #4, (to which you replied that you will try but without then explain if you understood and if you found problems and where); I should make a much more detailed explanation, perhaps schematized, that enters the details of procedures that not knowing your knowledge of the software I could not rule out. this is necessary resources of time that, of course, during the day I do not have and in the evening, at the moment, I do not want to invest preferring to dedicate them to anything else.

that this is a consideration that has nothing to do with you: maybe, finally, seeing a colleague who does not receive the help from the usual 2/3 someone of the many users who make requests also begins to propose solutions.

 

[Gabi Scantamburlo]

All right thank you I will ask others .I know and do not always repeat the same things as if you were the owner of the forum

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I know and I don't always repeat the same things as if you were a forum owner

If you feel a wrong behavior because I shouldn't report it to you?
I think I'm quite an old and helpful user of the forum to allow me some repression.
if you don't feel well under the messages there is a "sign" button that allows you to make removals on the user who wrote the message

 

[re_solidworks]

All right thank you I will ask others .I know and do not always repeat the same things as if you were the owner of the forum

is certainly not the owner but the rules must be respected. If the rules are not welcome you should go ask elsewhere.

Now, if we can report the discussion to a normal level, massivonweizen refers to a top-down design. by this method it is possible to obtain the parts and sub-assiems in the context of a set and not to create the finished part and then mount it. is the method I use in 95% of my work, in my case I prefer the use of modeling skeletons. If you have to deliver this job quickly and you have never used this method, I'd advise you to take this path. It is necessary to learn well the functioning of external references and to master them, otherwise we find ourselves with unmanageable assemblies. It is a matter too vast and complex to be treated in a discussion of a forum.