together with "empty" parts

[MARCOO]

a friend using ptccreo has positively intrigued me with his way of building the assemblies:
-creates a "main" part with various references (main faces, holes ..... ) consists of only surfaces that dimensionally identify all of our finite piece set .
-creates by appointing the individual blank parts (without defining anything) that make up the axieme.
- then create the real axieme by inserting the "main" part of only surfaces and all other blank parts with the matching system of the coordinates.
-It then constructs the individual parts by copying surfaces, holes or anything else that can be used on the "main" part and building on these references the actual part that thus turns out to be linked to the "main" part.

It is certainly possible even with st6 unfortunately I have stuck in the construction of the real aid, the "main" part built with surfaces, I can not see it.
if someone can give me a help thank you from now on.

 

[Be_on_edge]

a friend using ptccreo has positively intrigued me with his way of building the assemblies:
-creates a "main" part with various references (main faces, holes ..... ) consists of only surfaces that dimensionally identify all of our finite piece set .
-creates by appointing the individual blank parts (without defining anything) that make up the axieme.
- then create the real axieme by inserting the "main" part of only surfaces and all other blank parts with the matching system of the coordinates.
-It then constructs the individual parts by copying surfaces, holes or anything else that can be used on the "main" part and building on these references the actual part that thus turns out to be linked to the "main" part.

It is certainly possible even with st6 unfortunately I have stuck in the construction of the real aid, the "main" part built with surfaces, I can not see it.
if someone can give me a help thank you from now on.

right-click on the part - "show\nascondi" - "view buildings"

Let me say that by means of the method indicated a jump in the past at least 20 years

Hi.

 

[MARCOO]

thanks for the suggestion .
p.s. : I accept any suggestions also different from this if improved.
Thanks again

 

[Be_on_edge]

thanks for the suggestion .
p.s. : I accept any suggestions also different from this if improved.
Thanks again

the topic is very vast, in the jargon is called "top design - down", the tools available are really many, the method illustrated by your friend is the one from which everything was born, even before with sketches instead of surfaces (called skeleton) born of ptc.

There is an old tutorial that illustrates some techniques to approach topdown design methods, you should find it in the index place.

Hi.

 

[MARCOO]

Thank you, I'll go see.
Hi.

 

[Davimont]

I am intruding in the discussion because I was intrigued by the statement of be_on_edge

Why do you say that with the top-down design you pop in the past? with modern cad this technique is no longer in use?
I was thinking about designing a car with that method because I like the idea of changing a sketch together and seeing updated all the components connected to that sketch.

even if [MENTION=73362]Marcous[/MENTION] it would be an interesting topic to deal with, otherwise you could open a new discussion.

all because I want to learn new things and if I misinterpreted the claim of welln_edge then I apologize.:frown:

 

[delki]

I am intruding in the discussion because I was intrigued by the statement of be_on_edge

Why do you say that with the top-down design you pop in the past? with modern cad this technique is no longer in use?
I was thinking about designing a car with that method because I like the idea of changing a sketch together and seeing updated all the components connected to that sketch.

if you are @Marcous it would be an interesting topic to deal with, otherwise you could open a new discussion.

all because I want to learn new things and if I misinterpreted the claim of welln_edge then I apologize.:frown:

do not jump into the past with the top down methodology, but with the specific method illustrated initially

 

[Be_on_edge]

all because I want to learn new things and if I misinterpreted the claim of welln_edge then I apologize.:frown:

jump in the past is to use a single part to pilot all design, the top down method is synonymous with design:finger:

 

[MARCOO]

Good morning be_on_edge
I decided, given my poor preparation, to approach me step by step and complete this track suggested by my friend . then we will improve with other methods + modern ...
I have a question to be asked to build the actual parts by fishing the references from the assieme (on the part that I have defined "main" ) : how do you copy the surfaces that interest me from the assieme and transfer them as references in the construction of the real part ?
Thank you very much
Hi.

 

[Be_on_edge]

Good morning be_on_edge
I decided, given my poor preparation, to approach me step by step and complete this track suggested by my friend . then we will improve with other methods + modern ...
I have a question to be asked to build the actual parts by fishing the references from the assieme (on the part that I have defined "main" ) : how do you copy the surfaces that interest me from the assieme and transfer them as references in the construction of the real part ?
Thank you very much
Hi.

you need to use the command "copy in part" (not to be confused with "copy part").

I add that:
- the profiles can take them to the part with a simple "include" from inside the sketch.
- the axieme plans can be selected by holding the shift key
- the remarkable points you can directly select them on the axieme
- synchronous pieces can be edited directly by the axieme without having to enter and with some restrictions also ordered
- etc.

 

[MARCOO]

perfect and thank you very much.
Hi.

 

[MARCOO]

I take advantage of the great patience of be_on_edge:
I would like to ask a question about the "copy in part " command
I can't copy + a superfice at a time even using ctrl, which lengthens my passages a lot, what am I forgetting?
Thank you very much
Hi.

 

[Be_on_edge]

I take advantage of the great patience of be_on_edge:
I would like to ask a question about the "copy in part " command
I can't copy + a superfice at a time even using ctrl, which lengthens my passages a lot, what am I forgetting?
Thank you very much
Hi.

You can select more than one as long as they come from the same side.

 

[MARCOO]

The question was therefore: how do we copy + surfaces of the same part in a single passage?
Thanks again
Hi.

 

[MARCOO]

Sorry, found the mistake.
You're right. The problem jumped out when , to define simple equal holes placed in different points defined separately in the built main part of surfaces didn't let me copy them in a single block....
By redefining these holes in the main reference part in a single block, then they copy quietly all together ....