trabattello, scaffolding, or anything?

[IronMike87]

Having recently changed my job and I'm working on new things. beautiful because of course you learn new things, complicated because sometimes you give for discounted knowledge that I do not have.

by making it short: various internal discussions were born because someone claimed that the trabattelli used in the company to work in height had to carry mark.

I go to check and on the site of theinail I find expressly written that they cannot be marked ce as there is no directive.
must respect if anything Legislative Decree 81/08 and s.m.i.

Well, I say. I go ahead and I always read on the site of theinail that a trabattello must always rest on the wheels ed Otherwise the trabattello is considered scaffolding.I don't care. will only be a different category of identification ...
Very bad, instead. because looking at the normative references for scaffolding, these only concern the scaffolding for building buildings, which therefore are not applicable to my problem.

so at the practical moment I am now with high platforms that lean on fixed feet, not mountable/removable but fixed geometry, which I have no idea under which normative hat end.
this also considering that there is already a structural calculation report of the structure realized by an external study, however regarding the en 1004 that rule "temporary structures that have their own stability, consisting of prefabricated elements with project-compliant dimensions, four feet with swivel wheels and one or more platforms"

Does anyone know how to make light?
thanks in advance

ps for laughing and not crying I will call this balt object: It's not a trabattello, it's not a scaffold. knows only what is not

 

[pollo]

interesting, but I try to understand
balt rests on fixed feet, so it is not moveable if not dismounting it or lifting it with a crane/cart
Moreover, the platform on which the operator is placed, can change level? How? whipping up other pieces or with some gadget that makes her come up and down?
Finally, when was born balto? Do you have any precise reference? (purchase box, birth certificate issued by the balti's analogue, etc.)
I had a question similar to years ago, there was always the thickl, but in my case it was miniplanations to pipes and joints made from time to time in a ship yard to work / access on the ships
Hi.

 

[Legs]

see if it can return to platforms regulated by the uni 14122-2

 

[gerod]

Probably very close to the trabattello. missing wheels.
Although the definition is different, I would calculate it and design it according to the en 1004-1 (replaces 1004), I would also look at the series of portable scales (en 131-x) and en 14122-x.
there are many products that are not attributable to dedicated norms but which can be designed according to similar norms. If you think about the stabilized trabattello with feet... it's your case.
There is no directive/regulation of product for those equipment. if you are making a mistake (indebted affixation, sanctionable).
do the projects, do the calculations and follow the norm. Then you will demonstrate with your drawings, calculations, etc. that work equipment is safe. end of history. Hi.

 

[IronMike87]

interesting, but I try to understand
balt rests on fixed feet, so it is not moveable if not dismounting it or lifting it with a crane/cart
Moreover, the platform on which the operator is placed, can change level? How? whipping up other pieces or with some gadget that makes her come up and down?
Finally, when was born balto? Do you have any precise reference? (purchase box, birth certificate issued by the balti's analogue, etc.)
I had a question similar to years ago, there was always the thickl, but in my case it was miniplanations to pipes and joints made from time to time in a ship yard to work / access on the ships
Hi.

balt has 4 fixed feet, a scale of access to the raised platform which is at a fixed and unchangeable height if not intervening on the existing structure.
balto has recently become an adult but recently made a complete checkup at an engineering firm that said it is perfectly skillful and tireless to the tasks assigned to him, in full compliance with the legislation used to analyze it. :

Probably very close to the trabattello. missing wheels.
Although the definition is different, I would calculate it and design it according to the en 1004-1 (replaces 1004), I would also look at the series of portable scales (en 131-x) and en 14122-x.
there are many products that are not attributable to dedicated norms but which can be designed according to similar norms. If you think about the stabilized trabattello with feet... it's your case.
There is no directive/regulation of product for those equipment. if you are making a mistake (indebted affixation, sanctionable).
do the projects, do the calculations and follow the norm. Then you will demonstrate with your drawings, calculations, etc. that work equipment is safe. end of history. Hi.

Also the engineering study asked to verify its usability used the norm 1004 ... true that does not have wheels, but I fear it is a typical regulatory hole. I don't honestly see any other chances to spread the matter without trying to reinvent the wheel, which I would gladly avoid.

is already calculated and verified, I put on a nice plate with the maximum concentrated load, and I would close it here

 

[pollo]

do also a record of periodic checks (without stories, of an internal type, without resorting to authorized mega structures and various things).

 

[gerod]

put on the distributed load. or carried by level.
do some kind of manual or use procedure. That's what you need. and then the maintenance log.
Hi.